Author |
Topic |
Erundur
Acolyte
USA
10 Posts |
Posted - 04 Nov 2007 : 23:56:09
|
My first post, and of course it will be linguistic in nature. I know that practically all modern fantasy is derived from the ideas of Tolkien, and as such a lot of "copying" will occur. Nevertheless, as time goes on and ideas are tested, I would think D&D writers would branch off more and explore their own ideas. I believe they have done so to a large extent.
However, am I the only one who sees the resemblance in the new race of "Eladrin" to Tolkien's "Eldar" (the Elves), whose languages are the "Eldarin"? The Eladrin from what I've read will be the elves currently represented by Sun and Moon elves. (Star elves, too?) While Tolkien's elves were largely woodsmen, they seem to represent the direct idea source of 2nd Edition's Grey Elves - distant, reclusive, elegant and almost immortal. If this connection between the Eladrin and Tolkien's Eldar is accurate, couldn't they have come up with a slightly different name?
Thoughts? |
Inye Erundur, Varyar Eruhinion. |
|
|
Dalor Darden
Great Reader
USA
4211 Posts |
Posted - 05 Nov 2007 : 02:01:01
|
quote: Originally posted by Erundur
My first post, and of course it will be linguistic in nature. I know that practically all modern fantasy is derived from the ideas of Tolkien, and as such a lot of "copying" will occur. Nevertheless, as time goes on and ideas are tested, I would think D&D writers would branch off more and explore their own ideas. I believe they have done so to a large extent.
However, am I the only one who sees the resemblance in the new race of "Eladrin" to Tolkien's "Eldar" (the Elves), whose languages are the "Eldarin"? The Eladrin from what I've read will be the elves currently represented by Sun and Moon elves. (Star elves, too?) While Tolkien's elves were largely woodsmen, they seem to represent the direct idea source of 2nd Edition's Grey Elves - distant, reclusive, elegant and almost immortal. If this connection between the Eladrin and Tolkien's Eldar is accurate, couldn't they have come up with a slightly different name?
Thoughts?
My thought is that they are competing with other games...Middle-Earth has an Online Game now...movies to proclaim its greatness...and a table-top RPG (that mostly flopped as far as I was concerned).
HOWEVER
To get the largest audience...they have to pull from all corners.
Just my thoughts.
EDIT: for spelling and to add: D&D draws heavily on "English Fantasy" and the origin of a lot of that has to do with JRR Tolkien. |
The Old Grey Box and AD&D for me! |
Edited by - Dalor Darden on 05 Nov 2007 18:41:34 |
|
|
Ayunken-vanzan
Senior Scribe
Germany
657 Posts |
Posted - 05 Nov 2007 : 11:29:33
|
quote: Originally posted by Erundur
However, am I the only one who sees the resemblance in the new race of "Eladrin" to Tolkien's "Eldar" (the Elves), whose languages are the "Eldarin"? The Eladrin from what I've read will be the elves currently represented by Sun and Moon elves. (Star elves, too?) While Tolkien's elves were largely woodsmen, they seem to represent the direct idea source of 2nd Edition's Grey Elves - distant, reclusive, elegant and almost immortal. If this connection between the Eladrin and Tolkien's Eldar is accurate, couldn't they have come up with a slightly different name?
"Eladrins" is not a new name, this race already exists in core D&D and FR Lore of 3.x ed. Archons, Guardinals and Eladrins are the three good races populating the celestial outer planes with Eladrins being the chaotic good ones. The Manual of the Planes and the Book of Exalted Deeds have more informations on them, they are mentioned in the Player's Guide to Faerun, which details that they live in Arvandor and the Gates of the Moon, the later being the place of their faerie court. Both, core D&D and FR lore, agree in stating that the Eladrin are indepent from the Seldarine but working together in many fields.
But most importantly, they are described in one of the core rule books, i. e. the Monster Manual (p. 93). I presume Eladrins were already part of 2nd ed.
|
"What mattered our lives now? When our world had been torn from us? Folk wept, or drank, or stood staring out over the land, wondering what new horror each dawn would bring." Elender Stormfall of Suzail
"Anyone can kill deities, cause plagues, or destroy organizations. It takes real skill to make them live on." Varl
FR/D&D-Links • 2ed Downloads |
|
|
Kentinal
Great Reader
4688 Posts |
Posted - 05 Nov 2007 : 19:37:52
|
quote: [i]Originally posted by Ayunken-vanzan
But most importantly, they are described in one of the core rule books, i. e. the Monster Manual (p. 93). I presume Eladrins were already part of 2nd ed.
A quick search of 2nd MM and I do not find Eladrins in the Core rules. |
"Small beings can have small wisdom," the dragon said. "And small wise beings are better than small fools. Listen: Wisdom is caring for afterwards." "Caring for afterwards ...? Ker repeated this without understanding. "After action, afterwards," the dragon said. "Choose the afterwards first, then the action. Fools choose action first." "Judgement" copyright 2003 by Elizabeth Moon |
|
|
Erundur
Acolyte
USA
10 Posts |
Posted - 06 Nov 2007 : 00:41:23
|
I've seen them before in previous creature descriptions, but I thought they looked eagle- or bird-like. I presumed it was another switcharoo of the WotC in which a word or creature represented something other that what it had been historically . So, from an eagle-like creature to a name for the fairer elves.
Whenever the name was created, it looks awfully similar to me. Speaking of similar names, did WotC change "mithril" (as it was in the 90s under TSR) to "mithral" due to copyright infringement? Tolkien invented the fictional substance (as far as I know), and it was spelled "mithril" precisely. |
Inye Erundur, Varyar Eruhinion. |
|
|
KnightErrantJR
Great Reader
USA
5402 Posts |
Posted - 06 Nov 2007 : 01:33:29
|
Eladrin's date back to at least the Planescape Monstrous Compendium Volume Two, from 2nd edition (from 1995, if I recall correctly), and the first entry for them is on page 28.
quote: The eladrin are the native race of Arborea just as the baatezu are associated with Baator and the tanar'ri with the Abyss.
The above pretty well sums up how the races has been portrayed for the last decade or so. |
|
|
Purple Dragon Knight
Master of Realmslore
Canada
1796 Posts |
Posted - 06 Nov 2007 : 02:16:17
|
It's a real shame they're making moon and sun elves eladrins! why, that would have been a perfect opportunity for WotC to make the FRCS more appealing to non-FR gamers: by including two new ELF subraces in the 2008 FRCS... tsk tsk tsk |
|
|
Ayunken-vanzan
Senior Scribe
Germany
657 Posts |
Posted - 06 Nov 2007 : 06:30:20
|
quote: Originally posted by Erundur
I've seen them before in previous creature descriptions, but I thought they looked eagle- or bird-like. I presumed it was another switcharoo of the WotC in which a word or creature represented something other that what it had been historically . So, from an eagle-like creature to a name for the fairer elves.
You seem to confuse them with guardinals, the neutral good celestials from Elysium, with the avorals being one of their races. The Eladrin were alway elf-like in the 3.x ed sources. |
"What mattered our lives now? When our world had been torn from us? Folk wept, or drank, or stood staring out over the land, wondering what new horror each dawn would bring." Elender Stormfall of Suzail
"Anyone can kill deities, cause plagues, or destroy organizations. It takes real skill to make them live on." Varl
FR/D&D-Links • 2ed Downloads |
|
|
Caedwyr
Seeker
87 Posts |
Posted - 06 Nov 2007 : 15:29:31
|
Eladins were detailed in one of the the 2nd edition Planescape monstrous compendiums.
quote: The eladrins are the native race of Arborea, just as the baatezu are associated with Baator and the tanar’ri with the Abyss. They’re wild and free beings who exult in their own existence and live a life of song and celebration. The eladrins aid all people of good hearts against the forces of evil, but seek to do so with individual acts of kindness or heroism.
In Arborea, the eladrins move from place to place constantly, reveling in the natural beauty of the plane and seeking adventure. They’re defenders of goodness and freedom wherever it is threatened, and seek to counter the influences of tanar’ri and baatezu among mortals. To the eladrins, mortals should be free to choose their own destinies without fiendish interference; many of the more powerful eladrins constantly roam the planes and prime-material worlds, working against the baatezu and tanar’ri who seek to dominate these realms.
Although the individual types of eladrins are diverse in power and appearance, as a race they’re creatures of faerie grace, quickness, and beauty. Eladrins fall into two categories:
+ Lesser (bralani, coure, noviere, shiere) + Greater (firre, ghaele, tulani)
Lesser eladrins rarely leave the plane of Arborea, but greater eladrins can be found anywhere serving the cause of good.
COMBAT: All eladins can use the following spell-like powers once per round at will: alter self, comprehend languages, cure light wounds, detect evil, and phantasmal force. They're partially immune to the effects of many attack forms as shown below.
Attack Form Damage Acid Full Cold Half (None) Electricity (lightning) None Fire (dragon, magical) Half Gas (poisonous, etc.) Half Iron weapon Doubled (Full) Magic missile None Poison Full (Half) Silver weapon Full*
Lesser eladrins’re vulnerable to weapons of cold-wrought iron and suffer double damage dice from any cold iron weapon that strikes them. If the cold iron weapon is enchanted, the eladrins ignore the double damage; the magic spoils the baneful properties of the blade. Greater eladrins don’t suffer double damage from a cold iron weapon, but they do suffer normal damage even if the weapon normally couldn’t hit them because of a lack of enchantment. For example, a greater eladrin normally hit only by +3 weapons or better can be damaged by a nonmagical cold iron weapon. Cold iron weapons have to be custom-made and cost twice as much as normal. Silver weapons inflict full damage if they are sufficiently enchanted to be able to damage the eladrin anyway.
PLANAR TRAVEL: Any eladrin can travel to any Upper Plane. Ysgard, the Outlands, and the Astral Plane. Greater eladrins can travel to any Outer or Inner Plane, the Ethereal Plane, or any prime-material world. Unlike many fiends, eladrins can freely enter any world they can reach; they don’t have to wait until they’re summoned. However, eladrins are required to veil themselves when traveling in prime-material worlds. The same laws that force a baatezu or tanar’ri to subject itself to the manipulations of a wizard also prevent an eladrin from revealing its true nature except under the direst of circumstances.
When an eladrin is veiled, it takes on the guise of a creature native to the world it is journeying in. It may assume a human or demihuman form, pretending to be an adventurer or wandering bard. Once committed to its veil, it can’t do anythmg that its assumed identity couldn’t do whenever a mortal might be near enough to see. Should an eladrin violate its veil, it has to return to Arborea for 1,001 years before waking the prime-material worlds again. Usually the violator eladrin is allowed a brief time - a few minutes or an hour - to attend to any business it has to finish before it is called away.
THE COURT OF STARS: The magical and mysterious heart of the eladins lies in the Court of Stars, where the beautiful Queen Morwel reigns over her people. Morwel is sometimes called the Faerie Queen, the Lady of the Lake, or the Lady of Stars; she’s probably a demipower in her own right, and she’s surrounded by the brightest and most gracious of the eladrins. The Court moves from place to place throughout Arborea, existing only where night falls over the realm. The Court of Stars isn’t really the government of the eladrins as much as it is the heart or spirit of the race. The eladrins’re on good terms with the elven pantheon and the Greek pantheon, but they tend to keep to the wilds of Arborea. When the eladrins visit Olympus, they often assume the forms of petitioners or forest spirits, veiling their true nature. In the elven realms, the eladrins feel free to show themselves for what they are. On rare occasions, the eladrins join with the aasimon who serve the Greek and elven powers when some profound evil threatens all of Arborea. But for the most part, they prefer to leave the powers be and govern their own affairs.
There's also entries for all the varieties mentioned. If they're made a player selectable race as described in 2nd edition sources, native to the Prime Material Plane, then they'd be totally unbalanced compared to other races. |
Edited by - Caedwyr on 06 Nov 2007 15:31:27 |
|
|
Foxhelm
Senior Scribe
Canada
592 Posts |
Posted - 06 Nov 2007 : 17:19:59
|
My thought is the "Earthly" Eladrin would be a race of more civilized elves rather then the wilder elves being used in the new PH. The question is what will happen to the "Heavenly" Eladrin. Will they be given a new name, would they be the name sakes of the E-eladrin or perhaps some ancestors of the E-Eladrin. Or would all goodly celestial be collected into the main heading of Angels? This is what we are waiting for. |
Ed Greenwood! The Solution... and Cause of all the Realms Problems! |
|
|
Caedwyr
Seeker
87 Posts |
Posted - 06 Nov 2007 : 17:25:56
|
Aasimon, Archons - LG Guardinals - NG Eldarin - CG Can't remember off-hand Rilmani - TN Slaadi - CN Baatezu - LE Yugoloth - NE Tanar'ri - CE
Plus several other species groups for each alignment. I have a feeling that the above list is going to be pruned somewhat. |
|
|
Thauramarth
Senior Scribe
United Kingdom
729 Posts |
Posted - 06 Nov 2007 : 20:33:07
|
quote: Originally posted by Caedwyr
Aasimon, Archons - LG Guardinals - NG Eldarin - CG Can't remember off-hand Rilmani - TN Slaadi - CN Baatezu - LE Yugoloth - NE Tanar'ri - CE
Plus several other species groups for each alignment. I have a feeling that the above list is going to be pruned somewhat.
You forgot those loveable Modrons (LN)! |
|
|
Venger
Learned Scribe
USA
268 Posts |
Posted - 23 Nov 2007 : 10:28:53
|
quote: I agree with Kentinal about Corellon becoming the God of Magic in FR -- after all, why would they have eliminated all the other deities associated with magic from the Pantheon?
They don't need to eliminate them in order to make Corellon a God of Magic. After all, he's a member of the Elven Pantheon, not the Faerunian Pantheon. So they can duplicate Portfolios without any trouble.
quote: And Rich Baker has admitted that they are going to "simplify" or "trim" the Pantheon -- James Wyatt writing that Corellon is going to be a deity worshipped by all the races this is becoming quite evident, don't you think?
That doesn't mean that the Core Pantheon will subsume the Faerunian Pantheon.
quote: Taking this line of thought even further, perhaps Bane will slay Tempus and become a tyrannical God of War in the 'Points of Light' Faerûn? It would certainly fit the this concept.
Or maybe like many other gods who're worshipped on several different worlds, he'll have different Portfolios in the core setting then he will in Faerun? Tyr, for example, is a Greater God of Justice in the Faerunian Pantheon. But in the Asgardian Pantheon, he's only an Intermediate God, and has five Portfolios, none of which are Justice. Similarly with Lolth, who on Oerth has two less Portfolios then she does on Faerun. And Bane himself is worshipped on Ravenloft, too, where he has the Portfolio of Tyranny, but NOT the Portfolios of Fear or Hatred. Instead, he has about four or five other Portfolios in their place (Lathander's also worshipped in Ravenloft, where he's Chaotic Good, instead of Neutral Good). So just because Bane is the God of War in the Core Pantheon, it doesn't mean that he's going to be killing Tempus and taking his stuff in the Faerunian Pantheon.
quote: And I wouldn't be surprised anymore if Bahamut became the new God of Justice in FR, too -- perhaps Tyr is deemed "unworthy" of his portfolio after he killed Helm and Bahamut will "steal his stuff"? I certainly hope not, but it's a frightening possibility too.
Has there been any indication whatsoever that Tyr is going to be gone in the 4E Realms? Any shred of evidence whatsoever? If not, then why do you consider that a possibility?
quote: Didn't Rich say a while ago that the Warforged won't be in the Realms? Well, now he's stated that "every Core Race will be in the Realms, too". Maybe the same applies for deities
Once again, what shred of proof do you have to support this conclusion? Do you have anything at all? How does "every core race being in the Realms" suddenly equal "the Core Pantheon supplanting the Faerunian Pantheon"? Well, many of the Greyhawk gods are sticking around. So is Pelor going to show up in the Realms, too? Is Lathander going to be killed off along with Tempus and Tyr? Boy, the more these 4E discussions wind on, the more I'm reminded of this particular quote.
quote: ONLINE FANDOM RULE #1: If a situation is ever unclear, assume whatever it would take to drive you into a blind rage.
It's ridiculous. Some people, it seems, are so hellbent on being mad about the release of 4E that they're making all sorts of unfounded assumptions in order to get themselves nice and angry. If you're going to rant about something, then at least save some bandwidth and rant about something that's in black and white and which is a fact. Like what's written in Grand History of the Realms. So far, however, there has been no hint that Tempus is going to be killed*, that Tyr is getting replaced by Bahamut, that the Core Pantheon is going to replace the Faerunian Pantheon, etc. So how about saving the ranting for actual facts, rather then baseless assumptions? *Yeah, Bane was reffered to in that article as the God of War in Faerun, but the guy most likely misspoke, conflating Core Pantheon Bane for Faerunian Pantheon Bane. As for the Eladrin, this is my take on it (And this has somewhat been verified by a WOTC employee. I can dig up the quote if anyone wants it). The Eladrin race is made up of numerous subraces, varying in power. Although with the name Eladrin being applied to a specific subrace, I can see the entire race getting renamed. Maybe they'll be called the Seelie, or the Sidhe. Anyway, this is the way I view it.
[*]Elves - They're the ones who've made permanent homes on the Prime Material, and have been the most changed by it. [*]Drow - Twisted versions of the Eladrin who've taken to living in the Underdark. They're changed from the Eladrin, but not so different as the Elves. [*]Eladrin - Some make their home on the Prime Material, while others live in Arborea. They're the weakest of their Arborea dwelling kin. [*]Coure [*]Noviere [*]Bralani [*]Shiere [*]Firre [*]Ghaele [*]Tulani - The most powerful of their kind. The Faerie Lords. So essentially, they'd be like how they were before, except elves would be make yet another branch of this same race. Personally, I like what they're doing with elves.
quote: It's a real shame they're making moon and sun elves eladrins! why, that would have been a perfect opportunity for WotC to make the FRCS more appealing to non-FR gamers: by including two new ELF subraces in the 2008 FRCS... tsk tsk tsk
The last thing the Realms needs is even more Elven subraces. I'm perfectly fine wth seeing Wild Elves and Wood Elves folded into one race, and Moon Elves and Sun Elves folded into another race. Hell, I'd be fine with having all those elf subraces folded into one race. Physical characteristics and culture is all you need to differentiate one group from another. You don't need variable stat bonuses to do the job. Besides, it's ridiculous to have an Elf that provides a different stat bonus depending on what class you want to play. Playing a Wizard? Here's a +2 Int Elf. A Rogue? Here's a +2 Dex Elf. Want to play a Fighter? Here's an Elf with a +2 Str. Want to play a Barbarian with lots of hit points? Here's an Elf without a Con penalty. Want to play an uber elf? Here's a Drow. Enough with the proliferation of Elven subraces! |
"Beware what you say when you speak of magic, wizard, or you shall see who has the greater power." |
Edited by - Venger on 23 Nov 2007 10:43:22 |
|
|
Brian R. James
Forgotten Realms Game Designer
USA
1098 Posts |
Posted - 23 Nov 2007 : 16:39:53
|
Amen, brother Venger! I couldn't agree more.
quote: Originally posted by Venger
The last thing the Realms needs is even more Elven subraces. I'm perfectly fine wth seeing Wild Elves and Wood Elves folded into one race, and Moon Elves and Sun Elves folded into another race. Hell, I'd be fine with having all those elf subraces folded into one race. Physical characteristics and culture is all you need to differentiate one group from another. You don't need variable stat bonuses to do the job. Besides, it's ridiculous to have an Elf that provides a different stat bonus depending on what class you want to play. Playing a Wizard? Here's a +2 Int Elf. A Rogue? Here's a +2 Dex Elf. Want to play a Fighter? Here's an Elf with a +2 Str. Want to play a Barbarian with lots of hit points? Here's an Elf without a Con penalty. Want to play an uber elf? Here's a Drow. Enough with the proliferation of Elven subraces!
|
Brian R. James - Freelance Game Designer
Follow me on Twitter @brianrjames |
|
|
KnightErrantJR
Great Reader
USA
5402 Posts |
Posted - 23 Nov 2007 : 17:07:16
|
quote: Originally posted by Venger
ONLINE FANDOM RULE #1: If a situation is ever unclear, assume whatever it would take to drive you into a blind rage. It's ridiculous. Some people, it seems, are so hellbent on being mad about the release of 4E that they're making all sorts of unfounded assumptions in order to get themselves nice and angry. If you're going to rant about something, then at least save some bandwidth and rant about something that's in black and white and which is a fact. Like what's written in Grand History of the Realms. So far, however, there has been no hint that Tempus is going to be killed*, that Tyr is getting replaced by Bahamut, that the Core Pantheon is going to replace the Faerunian Pantheon, etc. So how about saving the ranting for actual facts, rather then baseless assumptions?
I can understand that you want to support 4th edition Realms, or at least give it a chance. That's fine. And some people that have been fairly anti-4th edition have been less than balanced in their presentation of facts, based on what I've seen across various websites.
On the other hand, some of what you have quoted, and then assumed to e a "rant" or a "baseless assumption," was neither a rank nor an assumption, but rather speculation. In several places posters have asked "what if" or "does this mean." This isn't an assumption at all, its conjecture.
Fans conjecture, especially when presented with a lack of facts. I would even go so far as to conjecture, myself, that if WOTC had used less extreme terminology in its descriptions of 4th edition Realms, the drive to figure out what is going to happen might be lessened.
Its the Grand History of the Realms that mentioned that the Spellplague was the end of one world the the beginning of a "terrible" new one. And its the prologue to the Orc King that fuels a lot of the speculation as well. WOTC seems to want to brace fans for the absolute worst with some of their over the top terminology. Had they not used such terms, there may have been less speculation, but also less buzz.
I don't want to see people stating that they know X or Y is going to happen based on an extreme extrapolation of presented facts, but at the same time, why berate people for conjecturing on what might happen, when its clear they are conjecturing? |
|
|
Rinonalyrna Fathomlin
Great Reader
USA
7106 Posts |
Posted - 25 Nov 2007 : 02:22:12
|
And regarding that bold-faced rule: Interestingly enough, I've found it to be surprisingly accurate in my own case regarding 4E Realms--well, I haven't gone into "blind rage", but I've been pretty annoyed. There was once time when I would think, "They wouldn't do that, would they? It would make no sense, it would contradict past lore, it would upset so many people." I don't think that way anymore because I've found that yes, they would "do it", however nonsensical "it" might be. |
"Instead of asking why we sleep, it might make sense to ask why we wake. Perchance we live to dream. From that perspective, the sea of troubles we navigate in the workaday world might be the price we pay for admission to another night in the world of dreams." --Richard Greene (letter to Time) |
|
|
Rinonalyrna Fathomlin
Great Reader
USA
7106 Posts |
Posted - 25 Nov 2007 : 02:25:23
|
quote: Originally posted by KnightErrantJR
Its the Grand History of the Realms that mentioned that the Spellplague was the end of one world the the beginning of a "terrible" new one. And its the prologue to the Orc King that fuels a lot of the speculation as well. WOTC seems to want to brace fans for the absolute worst with some of their over the top terminology. Had they not used such terms, there may have been less speculation, but also less buzz.
Very good point, and who can blame fans of the Chosen of Mystra for being upset when Chris Perkins comes along and basically says point blank, "fans of Chosen won't be too happy with us"? I'd say WotC bears some of the blame for all the rampant negativity. |
"Instead of asking why we sleep, it might make sense to ask why we wake. Perchance we live to dream. From that perspective, the sea of troubles we navigate in the workaday world might be the price we pay for admission to another night in the world of dreams." --Richard Greene (letter to Time) |
|
|
Asgetrion
Master of Realmslore
Finland
1564 Posts |
Posted - 25 Nov 2007 : 23:39:56
|
quote: Originally posted by Venger
quote: They don't need to eliminate them in order to make Corellon a God of Magic. After all, he's a member of the Elven Pantheon, not the Faerunian Pantheon. So they can duplicate Portfolios without any trouble.
Yet this (elimination of the Gods of Magic from the FR Pantheon) is what happened, because they deliberately wanted to remove some "overlap" in portfolios (at least according to Rich Baker). Note that Gorm and Haela got "axed" for the same reason and Clangeddin will apparently end up "stealing their stuff". I may be making some flagrant assumptions again, but I have a hunch that FR Pantheon will be more "multicultural" just like it is in the Core Rules (take a look at the Design & Development article about the Core Pantheon).
quote:
That doesn't mean that the Core Pantheon will subsume the Faerunian Pantheon.
No, it doesn't. Yet I suspect that it (and the 4E mechanics) may very well *influence* the FR Pantheon. I am reminded by Rich Baker's comment about new deities in FR -- it'd be logical to assume that they'll be "interlopers" from the Core Pantheon, since 4E Design Philosophy seems to be about "making a DM's life easier" (and the life of the designers, too). I honestly doubt that they'll actually "brainstorm" any new and original deities for FR -- it is easier for them and all FR DMs (at least if you want to run Core Modules in FR) if these "newcomers" are simply taken from the Core Pantheon.
quote: Or maybe like many other gods who're worshipped on several different worlds, he'll have different Portfolios in the core setting then he will in Faerun? Tyr, for example, is a Greater God of Justice in the Faerunian Pantheon. But in the Asgardian Pantheon, he's only an Intermediate God, and has five Portfolios, none of which are Justice. Similarly with Lolth, who on Oerth has two less Portfolios then she does on Faerun. And Bane himself is worshipped on Ravenloft, too, where he has the Portfolio of Tyranny, but NOT the Portfolios of Fear or Hatred. Instead, he has about four or five other Portfolios in their place (Lathander's also worshipped in Ravenloft, where he's Chaotic Good, instead of Neutral Good). So just because Bane is the God of War in the Core Pantheon, it doesn't mean that he's going to be killing Tempus and taking his stuff in the Faerunian Pantheon.
Oh, it's a possibility. Yet if that is the case, then James Wyatt -- a very experienced RPG designer -- did not do his homework (a bit unlikely). In any case, I'm only speculating on this. However, I'm fairly certain that Garagos and Anhur will be subsumed by Tempus -- three deities of War will probably be too "complicated" for 4E target audience. ;)
It's true that different settings often portray different aspects of a deity. There're actually many aliases and aspects for deities even in the different lands of Faerûn (e.g. Akadi, Lolth and Talos) -- not to mention heresies and local cults.
quote: Has there been any indication whatsoever that Tyr is going to be gone in the 4E Realms? Any shred of evidence whatsoever? If not, then why do you consider that a possibility?
No, but I was thinking of how Tyr behaved very "uncharacteristically" (for a God of Justice) in slaying Helm and subsequently hiding his hand in the affair. Why Tyr? Why not just Cyric, or Talos, or even (*shudder*) Shar? That might indicate that there is some sort of hidden purpose behind this messy and illogical event -- i.e. Tyr being convicted of the death of Helm and being replaced by Bahamut. Again, this is all pure speculation, but I *am* yet again reminded by Rich Baker's comment about "new deities" in the Realms, and Bahamut would be a suitable "replacement" for Tyr (especially since he already *is* venetrated in the Realms).
quote: Once again, what shred of proof do you have to support this conclusion? Do you have anything at all? How does "every core race being in the Realms" suddenly equal "the Core Pantheon supplanting the Faerunian Pantheon"? Well, many of the Greyhawk gods are sticking around. So is Pelor going to show up in the Realms, too? Is Lathander going to be killed off along with Tempus and Tyr? Boy, the more these 4E discussions wind on, the more I'm reminded of this particular quote. [quote]ONLINE FANDOM RULE #1: If a situation is ever unclear, assume whatever it would take to drive you into a blind rage.
It's ridiculous. Some people, it seems, are so hellbent on being mad about the release of 4E that they're making all sorts of unfounded assumptions in order to get themselves nice and angry. If you're going to rant about something, then at least save some bandwidth and rant about something that's in black and white and which is a fact. Like what's written in Grand History of the Realms. So far, however, there has been no hint that Tempus is going to be killed*, that Tyr is getting replaced by Bahamut, that the Core Pantheon is going to replace the Faerunian Pantheon, etc. So how about saving the ranting for actual facts, rather then baseless assumptions? *Yeah, Bane was reffered to in that article as the God of War in Faerun, but the guy most likely misspoke, conflating Core Pantheon Bane for Faerunian Pantheon Bane.
Actually, none of us most likely has any "proof" of anything about 4E Realms (beyond what has been revealed in 'The Orc King' and GHotR). However, we're entitled to our opinions as fans and customers, aren't we? Also note that there is a distinct difference between 'ranting' and 'speculation' (just as KnightErrant noted). I am most definitely *not* trying to pick a fight with 4E fans -- I am just presenting my opinions and speculating on certain matters to raise some discussion about them. So, pardon me for making some "baseless assumptions" (which is merely *your* subjective opinion, since I've at least *tried* to make some logical points about why I think these changes are *possible*). In any case, I've not claimed or implied that my opinions or speculations are *facts* (if you take a closer look at them, you might notice that I've used *conditional forms* in most of the sentences).
As for Lathander dying -- I think there might be a reason why the heresy of the Risen Sun was introduced in 'Power of Faerûn'. Besides, the rise of Netheril might further "empower" Amaunator to ascend to divinity and replace Lathander. Again, mere speculation but certainly a possibility, hey? |
"What am I doing today? Ask me tomorrow - I can be sure of giving you the right answer then." -- Askarran of Selgaunt, Master Sage, speaking to a curious merchant, Year of the Helm |
|
|
DestroyYouAlot
Seeker
USA
69 Posts |
Posted - 13 Dec 2007 : 04:37:38
|
Hi, folks,
Just dropping by to see what the feeling about the new game was around here - so far, more or less what I expected to see. I'm not terribly worried about the changes coming to the Realms as such, but I am saddened to realize that I won't be buying FR products anymore. The Grand History was the last, and I couldn't think of a more suitable product to go out on. Where they're going, I just can't follow - wouldn't want to - and the world they're describing just has nothing to do with the game I play.
From a certain point of view, however, these changes don't even apply to me; I already jumped ship from published lore around the 3.0 => 3.5 changeover. Ruleswise, I eventually ended up switching to HackMaster, and - while I'm currently playing in Garweeze Wurld (the HackMaster default setting) with published modules - I'm looking forward to coming back to the Realms with new eyes, free from having to worry about what new published material is going to do to my world, and with a system that hews closer to the assumptions the original was based on (Basic D&D and AD&D).
And I think it's time to turn the clock back a bit when I turn to the Realms again. "Historical" grey box campaign, anyone? There's still a lifetime worth of adventure in the FR products I've got, if I go back to look - even just with the grey box, Waterdeep & the North and Savage Frontier I've got a top-notch sandbox. I haven't touched on half the adventure hooks in the grey box DM book - several of those were developed in later metaplot, but what if they didn't happen that way? Splitting the Realms timeline off at one point or another gives you a whole different Realms to develop.
Which brings me to something I've wanted to see for a long time, around here: What are the odds that we can get some edition-specific forums at Candlekeep?
Not to line up for edition wars, mind you - and I don't thing CK is overly susceptible to that kind of thing - but what if there were a forum where we could discuss the Realms as it stands at the end of Third Edition? As it was published up until the end of Second Edition (and as I understand more than a few people here play it). Hell, a forum for the First Edition-only grognards! (Time of Troubles? Phooie!) I feel like there are enough players that "jumped ship" from published canon around the edition changes to warrant discussion of canon at those points. Anybody else see the utility in this? Personally, I picked and chose what current developments went into my game even when I was using current rules, but I'd hate to see fan / GM development of the Realms circa 1373 (or whatever) cease just because "rocks fell and everyone died" - 'cause it's not gonna have happened in every campaign. Am I wrong?
(I'll visit this question in its own thread later, but it seems to be pertinent to the "what do we do now?" question.)
For what they're trying to do - and I really do think this is a logical evolution towards video game-based / miniatures-focused play - I'm sure they'll pull it off (4e, that is). And with the (by all accounts sweeping) changes to the very reality of the game, there's no way for the Realms to continue in its current form. I know that. But it's not the game I want to play, and it's not the Realms I grew up with. So that's me out.
DYA
|
|
|
Alaundo
Head Moderator
United Kingdom
5695 Posts |
Posted - 13 Dec 2007 : 13:01:14
|
quote: Originally posted by DestroyYouAlot
Which brings me to something I've wanted to see for a long time, around here: What are the odds that we can get some edition-specific forums at Candlekeep?
Well met
Certainly a resonable idea, DestroyYouAlot, and not to be ruled out. I suppose the best thing to do is see how the ratio pans out after the release of 4e to see if it is warranted. |
Alaundo Candlekeep Forums Head Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
An Introduction to Candlekeep - by Ed Greenwood The Candlekeep Compendium - Tomes of Realmslore penned by Scribes of Candlekeep
|
|
|
DestroyYouAlot
Seeker
USA
69 Posts |
Posted - 13 Dec 2007 : 15:04:52
|
quote: Originally posted by Alaundo
[quote]Well met
Certainly a resonable idea, DestroyYouAlot, and not to be ruled out. I suppose the best thing to do is see how the ratio pans out after the release of 4e to see if it is warranted.
Thanks, Alaundo. You guys are the best hope - only hope? - for the Realms "as it was" to survive in active play, by my estimation. If there's an active community of folks doing fan development here for different versions of the setting, than there are options for those who don't like the edition change. Hope this pans out. |
|
|
Rinonalyrna Fathomlin
Great Reader
USA
7106 Posts |
Posted - 13 Dec 2007 : 15:19:29
|
Well, I can say that *I* certainly have chosen to break off from the official Realms at this point. I lot of other people don't follow the official timeline, as you pointed out. I think your idea is quite a sound one. |
"Instead of asking why we sleep, it might make sense to ask why we wake. Perchance we live to dream. From that perspective, the sea of troubles we navigate in the workaday world might be the price we pay for admission to another night in the world of dreams." --Richard Greene (letter to Time) |
|
|
dwarvenranger
Senior Scribe
USA
428 Posts |
Posted - 18 Dec 2007 : 18:07:57
|
All, I know is that this garbage I read on EN world about dwarves having been slaves to the giants better not make it into the final version or I'll be addin game designer to my list of favored enemiesSuch utter nonsense should have never been entertained in the most foolish of imaginations. If it's true it's enough of a reason for me not to be converting. |
If I waited till I knew what I was doing, I'd never get anything done.
|
|
|
Mace Hammerhand
Great Reader
Germany
2296 Posts |
Posted - 18 Dec 2007 : 21:54:43
|
From the little I read from the downloadable portion of the Races and yada yada book, D&D 4e is a new game, it really doesn't have much to do with the old one(s)... in case it has been said before, I apologize...didn't read the entire thread... |
Mace's not so gentle gamer's journal My rants were harmless compared to this, beware! |
|
|
Rinonalyrna Fathomlin
Great Reader
USA
7106 Posts |
Posted - 19 Dec 2007 : 00:09:09
|
quote: Originally posted by dwarvenranger
All, I know is that this garbage I read on EN world about dwarves having been slaves to the giants better not make it into the final version or I'll be addin game designer to my list of favored enemiesSuch utter nonsense should have never been entertained in the most foolish of imaginations. If it's true it's enough of a reason for me not to be converting.
I actually don't think these racial concepts are bad in and of themselves, but that doesn't mean I'd like to see them in the Realms setting. |
"Instead of asking why we sleep, it might make sense to ask why we wake. Perchance we live to dream. From that perspective, the sea of troubles we navigate in the workaday world might be the price we pay for admission to another night in the world of dreams." --Richard Greene (letter to Time) |
|
|
The Red Walker
Great Reader
USA
3567 Posts |
Posted - 19 Dec 2007 : 00:28:22
|
I think the time is past due that we at the 'keep start on Forgotten Realms Fe (Fan edition) |
A little nonsense now and then, relished by the wisest men - Willy Wonka
"We need men who can dream of things that never were." -
John F. Kennedy, speech in Dublin, Ireland, June 28, 1963
|
|
|
Hawkins
Great Reader
USA
2131 Posts |
Posted - 19 Dec 2007 : 00:40:36
|
quote: Originally posted by Rinonalyrna Fathomlin
I actually don't think these racial concepts are bad in and of themselves, but that doesn't mean I'd like to see them in the Realms setting.
I feel the same way. |
Errant d20 Designer - My Blog (last updated January 06, 2016)
One, two! One, two! And through and through The vorpal blade went snicker-snack! He left it dead, and with its head He went galumphing back. --Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking-Glass
"Mmm, not the darkness," Myrin murmured. "Don't cast it there." --Erik Scott de Bie, Shadowbane
* My character sheets (PFRPG, 3.5, and AE versions; not viewable in Internet Explorer) * Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Reference Document (PFRPG OGL Rules) * The Hypertext d20 SRD (3.5 OGL Rules) * 3.5 D&D Archives
My game design work: * Heroes of the Jade Oath (PFRPG, conversion; Rite Publishing) * Compendium Arcanum Volume 1: Cantrips & Orisons (PFRPG, designer; d20pfsrd.com Publishing) * Compendium Arcanum Volume 2: 1st-Level Spells (PFRPG, designer; d20pfsrd.com Publishing) * Martial Arts Guidebook (forthcoming) (PFRPG, designer; Rite Publishing)
|
|
|
Steven Schend
Forgotten Realms Designer & Author
USA
1715 Posts |
Posted - 19 Dec 2007 : 05:15:22
|
quote: Originally posted by The Red Walker
I think the time is past due that we at the 'keep start on Forgotten Realms Fe (Fan edition)
Can I be in charge of the Kyriani Agrivar slash fiction board?
Steven who had to ask before Wooly beat him to it...
PS: No, I don't really want to do that; frankly, what's being done around here already (the Compendiums et al) are more than solid enough material to count as its own FE... |
For current projects and general natter, see www.steveneschend.com
|
|
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
Australia
31772 Posts |
Posted - 19 Dec 2007 : 05:43:06
|
Thanks Steven. That's nice of you to say... That all the hard work the scribes of Candlekeep contribute, would be considered such in your opinion.
We appreciate that input.
|
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)
"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood
Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage |
|
|
Neriandal Freit
Senior Scribe
USA
396 Posts |
Posted - 19 Dec 2007 : 14:12:39
|
So, I need to ask (with out reading 40 pages of material here) if we have had any new updates to the whole 4E scheme?
Just on reading this page, I'm still very borderline in my thoughts, emotions and feel of it so I'd like to know if anything new?
Oh, and the mentioning of Chris at the top of the page...me and Kuje have a certain view of him thanks to GenCon '06. |
"Eating people is wrong...unless it's on the first date." - Ed Greenwood, GenCon Indy 2006 |
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|