Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Products
 Forgotten Realms RPG Products
 Champions of Valor
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 12

George Krashos
Master of Realmslore

Australia
6666 Posts

Posted - 06 Nov 2005 :  23:07:01  Show Profile Send George Krashos a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

Oh, and there's a notable artistic mistake. The write-up for Dornavver clearly states, more than once, that it's a sword. But the associated pic is a nifty-looking warhammer.



Yay, Dornavver survived the cut. And yes indeedy, it's a sword. In fact, its more common name is ... Demonbane for all you FR scholars. Go Impiltur!

-- George Krashos

"Because only we, contrary to the barbarians, never count the enemy in battle." -- Aeschylus
Go to Top of Page

warlockco
Master of Realmslore

USA
1695 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  00:07:53  Show Profile  Visit warlockco's Homepage Send warlockco a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by George Krashos

quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

Oh, and there's a notable artistic mistake. The write-up for Dornavver clearly states, more than once, that it's a sword. But the associated pic is a nifty-looking warhammer.



Yay, Dornavver survived the cut. And yes indeedy, it's a sword. In fact, its more common name is ... Demonbane for all you FR scholars. Go Impiltur!

-- George Krashos




The weapon shown and being called Dornavver is actually Oath-Hammer.

News of the Weird

D20 System Reference Document
D20 Modern System Reference Document
Go to Top of Page

Crennen FaerieBane
Master of Realmslore

USA
1378 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  00:36:17  Show Profile Send Crennen FaerieBane a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I love this tome! It is definitely on par with Champions of Ruin. I think these are great guidebooks to the diametrically opposed factions in the lands of Faerun. Kudos to the developers once again!

C-Fb

Still rockin' the Fey'ri style.
Go to Top of Page

Sanishiver
Senior Scribe

USA
476 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  03:27:31  Show Profile  Visit Sanishiver's Homepage Send Sanishiver a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I agree with Crennen. This book is pretty good.

I still don't know how I feel about the inclusion of Illumians and similar *new* ilk into Realms Resources, but I'm always challenging people here to be open to new rules, so I'll reserve judgment until later.

I think my favorite part of the book so far are the Places of Valor. I'm really pleased with both the artwork and especially the Dungeon Magazine-style format WotC used to portray these locations. The maps for Mholor Drinhal and Teumyshaaril in particular are just awesome.

And speaking of artwork: Damn! it's like WotC put the cream of their artist pool together for this book. Not one art piece left me feeling less than thrilled. Solid all around.

It's just too bad WotC couldn't devote just one half-page section to an Equine Comparison piece, so that we could see the differences between the various equine breeds in the Realms.

Time to go back to reading....

J. Grenemyer


09/20/2008: Tiger Army at the Catalyst in Santa Cruz. You wouldn’t believe how many females rode it out in the pit. Santa Cruz women are all of them beautiful. Now I know to add tough to that description.
6/27/2008: WALL-E is about the best damn movie Pixar has ever made. It had my heart racing and had me rooting for the good guy.
9/9/2006: Dave Mathews Band was off the hook at the Shoreline Amphitheater.

Never, ever read the game books too literally, or make such assumptions that what is omitted cannot be. Bad DM form, that.

And no matter how compelling a picture string theory paints, if it does not accurately describe our universe, it will be no more relevant than an elaborate game of Dungeons and Dragons. --paragraph 1, chapter 9, The Elegant Universe by Brian Greene
Go to Top of Page

Cam Beul
Acolyte

USA
27 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  03:42:41  Show Profile  Visit Cam Beul's Homepage Send Cam Beul a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by CrennenFaerieBane

I love this tome! It is definitely on par with Champions of Ruin. I think these are great guidebooks to the diametrically opposed factions in the lands of Faerun. Kudos to the developers once again!

C-Fb



Hmmm...that worries me. See, I didn't think CoR was all that great, at least not nearly what it could have been. I'd like to collect opinions on comparisons between the two books. But I'll probably check it out anyway, the substitution levels sound really good.
Go to Top of Page

BobROE
Learned Scribe

Canada
106 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  04:19:41  Show Profile  Visit BobROE's Homepage Send BobROE a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Cam Beul

quote:
Originally posted by CrennenFaerieBane

I love this tome! It is definitely on par with Champions of Ruin. I think these are great guidebooks to the diametrically opposed factions in the lands of Faerun. Kudos to the developers once again!

C-Fb



Hmmm...that worries me. See, I didn't think CoR was all that great, at least not nearly what it could have been. I'd like to collect opinions on comparisons between the two books. But I'll probably check it out anyway, the substitution levels sound really good.



I think it's alot better than CoR, which I thought was rather weak.
Go to Top of Page

Dargoth
Great Reader

Australia
4607 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  07:11:39  Show Profile  Visit Dargoth's Homepage Send Dargoth a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Sanishiver

I agree with Crennen. This book is pretty good.

I still don't know how I feel about the inclusion of Illumians and similar *new* ilk into Realms Resources, but I'm always challenging people here to be open to new rules, so I'll reserve judgment until later.





What have they tried to Shoehorn in and how have they done it?

“I am the King of Rome, and above grammar”

Emperor Sigismund

"Its good to be the King!"

Mel Brooks
Go to Top of Page

warlockco
Master of Realmslore

USA
1695 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  07:47:45  Show Profile  Visit warlockco's Homepage Send warlockco a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Dargoth

quote:
Originally posted by Sanishiver

I agree with Crennen. This book is pretty good.

I still don't know how I feel about the inclusion of Illumians and similar *new* ilk into Realms Resources, but I'm always challenging people here to be open to new rules, so I'll reserve judgment until later.





What have they tried to Shoehorn in and how have they done it?



They just offered ways to explain Goliaths, Illumians, and Raptorians to exist in the realms. They offered up several ways for each of those races.

News of the Weird

D20 System Reference Document
D20 Modern System Reference Document
Go to Top of Page

Gray Richardson
Master of Realmslore

USA
1291 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  07:48:53  Show Profile  Visit Gray Richardson's Homepage Send Gray Richardson a Private Message  Reply with Quote
The ideas for including Illumians, Goliaths and Raptorans are optional. It suggests several interesting alternate possible origins and homelands for them. About a paragraph for each race. It is included for DM's or players who want to use them in a campaign, but it is not presented as canonical. And it is interesting without taking up too much space. I thought it was nicely done and a nice touch.
Go to Top of Page

Dargoth
Great Reader

Australia
4607 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  07:55:37  Show Profile  Visit Dargoth's Homepage Send Dargoth a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Gray Richardson

The ideas for including Illumians, Goliaths and Raptorans are optional. It suggests several interesting alternate possible origins and homelands for them. About a paragraph for each race. It is included for DM's or players who want to use them in a campaign, but it is not presented as canonical. And it is interesting without taking up too much space. I thought it was nicely done and a nice touch.



So basicly there written up the same way as it was for the 2 Book Vile Darkness races in the PGTF?

“I am the King of Rome, and above grammar”

Emperor Sigismund

"Its good to be the King!"

Mel Brooks
Go to Top of Page

warlockco
Master of Realmslore

USA
1695 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  07:59:59  Show Profile  Visit warlockco's Homepage Send warlockco a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Gray Richardson

The ideas for including Illumians, Goliaths and Raptorans are optional. It suggests several interesting alternate possible origins and homelands for them. About a paragraph for each race. It is included for DM's or players who want to use them in a campaign, but it is not presented as canonical. And it is interesting without taking up too much space. I thought it was nicely done and a nice touch.



Yeah it was quite nice, especially the suggestions for the Raptorians.

News of the Weird

D20 System Reference Document
D20 Modern System Reference Document
Go to Top of Page

Antareana
Seeker

Germany
59 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  16:36:30  Show Profile  Visit Antareana's Homepage Send Antareana a Private Message  Reply with Quote
So an intiate Feat for Milil AND Subtitution levels (wich are a great Option IMO) for a Paladin of Sune...
I'm happy ^^

*desperately wants to get hand on this book*

It is all just a past and future secret

Go to Top of Page

Cam Beul
Acolyte

USA
27 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  21:00:55  Show Profile  Visit Cam Beul's Homepage Send Cam Beul a Private Message  Reply with Quote
To anyone who has purchased the book, are the substitution levels really that great? The reason I ask is it seems to me that those who are really happy with CoV are thrilled not with the substitution levels themselves, but with the fact that they are there. I read the substitution levels for a paladin of Mystra on WotC, and it seemed like a fair trade, but the Kelemvorite paladin substitution levels, according to a poster on wizards, basically replace anti-evil abilities with anti-undead abilities. That doesn't seem like an even trade, because most undead are evil anyay, and most of the ones that are not evil are mindless undead which tend to be rather weak.
Go to Top of Page

Rinonalyrna Fathomlin
Great Reader

USA
7106 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  21:08:59  Show Profile  Visit Rinonalyrna Fathomlin's Homepage Send Rinonalyrna Fathomlin a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Gray Richardson

The ideas for including Illumians, Goliaths and Raptorans are optional.



Thank God--I was worried there!

"Instead of asking why we sleep, it might make sense to ask why we wake. Perchance we live to dream. From that perspective, the sea of troubles we navigate in the workaday world might be the price we pay for admission to another night in the world of dreams."
--Richard Greene (letter to Time)
Go to Top of Page

Crennen FaerieBane
Master of Realmslore

USA
1378 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  21:14:10  Show Profile Send Crennen FaerieBane a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Hey, you can't hate on those new races.

Ok, well, they are a bit goofy.

C-Fb

Still rockin' the Fey'ri style.
Go to Top of Page

Dargoth
Great Reader

Australia
4607 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  22:12:08  Show Profile  Visit Dargoth's Homepage Send Dargoth a Private Message  Reply with Quote
If one of you guys who has CoV has access to a scanner can you email me the contents pages, Ill see if I can convert it to a text document

“I am the King of Rome, and above grammar”

Emperor Sigismund

"Its good to be the King!"

Mel Brooks
Go to Top of Page

warlockco
Master of Realmslore

USA
1695 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  22:51:11  Show Profile  Visit warlockco's Homepage Send warlockco a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Cam Beul

To anyone who has purchased the book, are the substitution levels really that great? The reason I ask is it seems to me that those who are really happy with CoV are thrilled not with the substitution levels themselves, but with the fact that they are there. I read the substitution levels for a paladin of Mystra on WotC, and it seemed like a fair trade, but the Kelemvorite paladin substitution levels, according to a poster on wizards, basically replace anti-evil abilities with anti-undead abilities. That doesn't seem like an even trade, because most undead are evil anyay, and most of the ones that are not evil are mindless undead which tend to be rather weak.



Some of them are quit nice, and others are .
And alot of the substitution levels are for knightly orders, especially the paladin ones.

News of the Weird

D20 System Reference Document
D20 Modern System Reference Document
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36804 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  22:52:40  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Cam Beul

To anyone who has purchased the book, are the substitution levels really that great? The reason I ask is it seems to me that those who are really happy with CoV are thrilled not with the substitution levels themselves, but with the fact that they are there. I read the substitution levels for a paladin of Mystra on WotC, and it seemed like a fair trade, but the Kelemvorite paladin substitution levels, according to a poster on wizards, basically replace anti-evil abilities with anti-undead abilities. That doesn't seem like an even trade, because most undead are evil anyay, and most of the ones that are not evil are mindless undead which tend to be rather weak.



But Kelemvor isn't concerned with evil... One of his primary goals is sending undead to their final rest. So it makes sense for a Kelemvorite paladin to swap his anti-evil abilities for anti-undead ones. If you want to be a paladin to fight evil, you pick a member of the Triad. If you want to be a paladin to smite undead, you pick a deity that wants to off all undead: Kelemvor.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Dargoth
Great Reader

Australia
4607 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  23:03:53  Show Profile  Visit Dargoth's Homepage Send Dargoth a Private Message  Reply with Quote
So how well do the Paladin of Kelemvor substiute levels blend with the Hunter of the Dead PrC?

“I am the King of Rome, and above grammar”

Emperor Sigismund

"Its good to be the King!"

Mel Brooks

Edited by - Dargoth on 07 Nov 2005 23:04:39
Go to Top of Page

Crennen FaerieBane
Master of Realmslore

USA
1378 Posts

Posted - 07 Nov 2005 :  23:16:09  Show Profile Send Crennen FaerieBane a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I really like some of the substitution levels - but the majority are for Paladins, as you would figure. There are a good many for clerics as well, but all other classes are few and far inbetween. I think that they add a certain flare to the character and helps to more easily identify a paladin to the deity they worship. If there are any specifics you are asking about, feel free to ask.

C-Fb

Still rockin' the Fey'ri style.
Go to Top of Page

Dargoth
Great Reader

Australia
4607 Posts

Posted - 08 Nov 2005 :  00:07:33  Show Profile  Visit Dargoth's Homepage Send Dargoth a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by CrennenFaerieBane

I really like some of the substitution levels - but the majority are for Paladins, as you would figure. There are a good many for clerics as well, but all other classes are few and far inbetween. I think that they add a certain flare to the character and helps to more easily identify a paladin to the deity they worship. If there are any specifics you are asking about, feel free to ask.

C-Fb



Can you list those that have substitution level write ups?

“I am the King of Rome, and above grammar”

Emperor Sigismund

"Its good to be the King!"

Mel Brooks
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36804 Posts

Posted - 08 Nov 2005 :  00:12:43  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by CrennenFaerieBane

I really like some of the substitution levels - but the majority are for Paladins, as you would figure. There are a good many for clerics as well, but all other classes are few and far inbetween. I think that they add a certain flare to the character and helps to more easily identify a paladin to the deity they worship. If there are any specifics you are asking about, feel free to ask.

C-Fb



Some of them are nice... I'm now wanting to create a wemic Lion Legionnaire!

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36804 Posts

Posted - 08 Nov 2005 :  00:15:11  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Dargoth

Can you list those that have substitution level write ups?



See warlockco's post from 06 Nov, at 20:07:52. (Back a page)

As for your other question, I'd have to look up the Hunter of the Dead PrC. Which tome was that in?

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

The Sage
Procrastinator Most High

Australia
31774 Posts

Posted - 08 Nov 2005 :  00:35:41  Show Profile Send The Sage a Private Message  Reply with Quote
The Hunter of the Dead PrC was first included in DRAGON # 276. It was then revised for it's inclusion in the Complete Warrior tome.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)

"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood

Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage
Go to Top of Page

Dargoth
Great Reader

Australia
4607 Posts

Posted - 08 Nov 2005 :  00:46:41  Show Profile  Visit Dargoth's Homepage Send Dargoth a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by The Sage

The Hunter of the Dead PrC was first included in DRAGON # 276. It was then revised for it's inclusion in the Complete Warrior tome.




What he said

“I am the King of Rome, and above grammar”

Emperor Sigismund

"Its good to be the King!"

Mel Brooks
Go to Top of Page

Cam Beul
Acolyte

USA
27 Posts

Posted - 08 Nov 2005 :  02:50:46  Show Profile  Visit Cam Beul's Homepage Send Cam Beul a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

quote:
Originally posted by Cam Beul

To anyone who has purchased the book, are the substitution levels really that great? The reason I ask is it seems to me that those who are really happy with CoV are thrilled not with the substitution levels themselves, but with the fact that they are there. I read the substitution levels for a paladin of Mystra on WotC, and it seemed like a fair trade, but the Kelemvorite paladin substitution levels, according to a poster on wizards, basically replace anti-evil abilities with anti-undead abilities. That doesn't seem like an even trade, because most undead are evil anyay, and most of the ones that are not evil are mindless undead which tend to be rather weak.



But Kelemvor isn't concerned with evil... One of his primary goals is sending undead to their final rest. So it makes sense for a Kelemvorite paladin to swap his anti-evil abilities for anti-undead ones. If you want to be a paladin to fight evil, you pick a member of the Triad. If you want to be a paladin to smite undead, you pick a deity that wants to off all undead: Kelemvor.



Right, but I wasn't disputing that it made sense, I was using it as an example of a substitution level that wasn't really a fair trade mechanically.
Go to Top of Page

warlockco
Master of Realmslore

USA
1695 Posts

Posted - 08 Nov 2005 :  03:23:18  Show Profile  Visit warlockco's Homepage Send warlockco a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Cam Beul
Right, but I wasn't disputing that it made sense, I was using it as an example of a substitution level that wasn't really a fair trade mechanically.



No one ever said trade-offs for flavor had to be fair though.

News of the Weird

D20 System Reference Document
D20 Modern System Reference Document
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36804 Posts

Posted - 08 Nov 2005 :  03:28:26  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by warlockco

quote:
Originally posted by Cam Beul
Right, but I wasn't disputing that it made sense, I was using it as an example of a substitution level that wasn't really a fair trade mechanically.



No one ever said trade-offs for flavor had to be fair though.



I'm not so sure about that... Using the substitution levels in essence makes for a variant class. This variant class is similar to the original, but has some different abilities that better suit its role. So it's almost an apples and oranges comparison. You're not comparing two regular paladins, you're comparing a regular one and one specialized to fight undead.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Cam Beul
Acolyte

USA
27 Posts

Posted - 08 Nov 2005 :  04:02:25  Show Profile  Visit Cam Beul's Homepage Send Cam Beul a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

quote:
Originally posted by warlockco

quote:
Originally posted by Cam Beul
Right, but I wasn't disputing that it made sense, I was using it as an example of a substitution level that wasn't really a fair trade mechanically.



No one ever said trade-offs for flavor had to be fair though.



I'm not so sure about that... Using the substitution levels in essence makes for a variant class. This variant class is similar to the original, but has some different abilities that better suit its role. So it's almost an apples and oranges comparison. You're not comparing two regular paladins, you're comparing a regular one and one specialized to fight undead.



I wasn't saying that it should be fair though. I wasn't complaining about anything. I was using it as an example to make a point in hopes that someone could verify that others were like that, or that they were not like that so I could know what to expect. And you're right Wooly, but I was comparing the two in assumption that they would fill a role in a campaign where anything can happen. In a particularly undead heavy campaign, the Kelemvorite variant would likely be the more effective. The unfortunate thing is that players will not always have the luxury of an insightful plot synopsis before character creation, so they might not consider a variant that would be much more suitable for that campaign than the original class that tends to be decent in a greater variaty of situations.

Edited by - Cam Beul on 08 Nov 2005 04:07:46
Go to Top of Page

KnightErrantJR
Great Reader

USA
5402 Posts

Posted - 08 Nov 2005 :  04:23:33  Show Profile  Visit KnightErrantJR's Homepage Send KnightErrantJR a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but a paladin of Kelemvor, or any other paladin for that matter, would not HAVE to take substitution levels, correct? In other words, Kelemvor could have orders devoted to and trained in killing undead, and ones that, while mainly concerned with the undead, retain their general abilities, or is there something in CoV that makes these substitutions manditory?
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 12 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000