Author |
Topic  |
sfdragon
Great Reader
    
2285 Posts |
|
Jorkens
Great Reader
    
Norway
2950 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 18:02:01
|
Smart move. I wonder if they will leave the 4ed. in print in some way to?
Now if they could only re-release the brown books, those are the only ones I am missing that I am really interested in. The prices for the originals are ridiculous and the clones are just not the same. |
No Canon, more stories, more Realms. |
 |
|
Ayrik
Great Reader
    
Canada
7989 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 18:04:02
|
I'll ask the obvious question. Why jump from 1E to 3.5E, skipping 2E and 3E reprints? |
[/Ayrik] |
 |
|
Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief

    
USA
36877 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 18:06:29
|
quote: Originally posted by Ayrik
I'll ask the obvious question. Why jump from 1E to 3.5E, skipping 2E and 3E reprints?
It's an odd strategy, but perhaps it's a form of testing the waters? |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!  |
 |
|
Irennan
Great Reader
    
Italy
3811 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 18:06:45
|
I wonder why do they reprint old versions of rules (which you can easily find on the SRD) and not of settings... |
Mathematics is the art of giving the same name to different things. |
Edited by - Irennan on 25 Jun 2012 18:07:13 |
 |
|
Jorkens
Great Reader
    
Norway
2950 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 18:07:07
|
Maybe because the world hasn't gotten over the idiotic bs that was spread about 2nd.ed. yet? Or maybe they both are just to like the more classic editions they already have decided to reprint. But you never know, if this works maybe they will return all versions in some way or another.
And more adventures for Star Frontiers please. |
No Canon, more stories, more Realms. |
 |
|
Therise
Master of Realmslore
   
1272 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 18:07:13
|
That's very interesting, color me a bit surprised.
|
Female, 40-year DM of a homebrew-evolved 1E Realms, including a few added tidbits of 2E and 3E lore; played originally in AD&D, then in Rolemaster. Be a DM for your kids and grandkids, gaming is excellent for families! |
 |
|
Diffan
Great Reader
    
USA
4460 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 18:07:20
|
Because 3E has a lot of internal problems that 3.5 supposedly fixed. The reprints are done with all the Errata they've made for that edition incorporated.
But really, it's a complete waste of money.
All of the information, barring WotC specific IP stuff from the Monster Manual like the Beholder, is for free on the d20srd so why would i buy stuff I can just access for free?? |
Diffan's NPG Generator: FR NPC Generator |
 |
|
Apex
Learned Scribe
 
USA
229 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 18:07:45
|
quote: Originally posted by Ayrik
I'll ask the obvious question. Why jump from 1E to 3.5E, skipping 2E and 3E reprints?
One of two things likely.
1) They have had issues with getting first reprinted due to a lack of formatting (from what I have heard) a similar issue may be with 2nd.
2) Popularity. It may be that 1st and 3.5 are the most popular out of print editions and they want to capture those sales first. |
 |
|
Jorkens
Great Reader
    
Norway
2950 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 18:09:22
|
quote: Originally posted by Diffan
Because 3E has a lot of internal problems that 3.5 supposedly fixed. The reprints are done with all the Errata they've made for that edition incorporated.
But really, it's a complete waste of money.
All of the information, barring WotC specific IP stuff from the Monster Manual like the Beholder, is for free on the d20srd so why would i buy stuff I can just access for free??
Because some people still like books?
But it will be interesting how the 1st. ed. books competes with the clones that are available in print already. |
No Canon, more stories, more Realms. |
 |
|
idilippy
Senior Scribe
  
USA
417 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 18:12:19
|
Just popped on and took the survey at the bottom. While the core 3.5e books are useless to me there are supplements I wouldn't mind picking up if released. My hope, a forlorn nearly hopeless hope, is that if these re-releases do well WotC might reverse their policy on old edition pdfs. There are so many Planescape and FR titles out there that I would happily buy from WotC if they just offered them. |
 |
|
Diffan
Great Reader
    
USA
4460 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 18:18:24
|
quote: Originally posted by Jorkens
quote: Originally posted by Diffan
Because 3E has a lot of internal problems that 3.5 supposedly fixed. The reprints are done with all the Errata they've made for that edition incorporated.
But really, it's a complete waste of money.
All of the information, barring WotC specific IP stuff from the Monster Manual like the Beholder, is for free on the d20srd so why would i buy stuff I can just access for free??
Because some people still like books?
But it will be interesting how the 1st. ed. books competes with the clones that are available in print already.
I guess, but it would depend on how much they're charging for me to consider buying them. But I guess some people like books just to have them *shrugs* |
Diffan's NPG Generator: FR NPC Generator |
 |
|
sleyvas
Skilled Spell Strategist
    
USA
12020 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 18:20:28
|
quote: Originally posted by Ayrik
I'll ask the obvious question. Why jump from 1E to 3.5E, skipping 2E and 3E reprints?
Just guessing here, but I'd bet they did a survey to see what versions of the games people liked the most. Probably these showed up as the favorites. The second guess would be that the people that liked 2nd edition maybe favored third edition even more. |
Alavairthae, may your skill prevail
Phillip aka Sleyvas |
 |
|
Jorkens
Great Reader
    
Norway
2950 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 18:21:46
|
quote: Originally posted by Diffan
quote: Originally posted by Jorkens
quote: Originally posted by Diffan
Because 3E has a lot of internal problems that 3.5 supposedly fixed. The reprints are done with all the Errata they've made for that edition incorporated.
But really, it's a complete waste of money.
All of the information, barring WotC specific IP stuff from the Monster Manual like the Beholder, is for free on the d20srd so why would i buy stuff I can just access for free??
Because some people still like books?
But it will be interesting how the 1st. ed. books competes with the clones that are available in print already.
I guess, but it would depend on how much they're charging for me to consider buying them. But I guess some people like books just to have them *shrugs*
Or because we just cant read that much on a pc screen. It is probably a generation thing, but older editions may aim at older gamers that prefer physical books? |
No Canon, more stories, more Realms. |
 |
|
Jorkens
Great Reader
    
Norway
2950 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 18:24:41
|
quote: Originally posted by sleyvas
quote: Originally posted by Ayrik
I'll ask the obvious question. Why jump from 1E to 3.5E, skipping 2E and 3E reprints?
The second guess would be that the people that liked 2nd edition maybe favored third edition even more.
No, it was more that the holdouts were attempted browbeaten into believing they were idiots for not moving forward or for not staying with 1st.ed.
OK, I am over dramatising here. But I have read one ridiculous claim about 2nd. ed. to many throughout the years. |
No Canon, more stories, more Realms. |
 |
|
Jeremy Grenemyer
Great Reader
    
USA
2717 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 18:40:30
|
Just took the survey.
For me not enough time has passed to view the 3E era books with any sort of nostalgia. |
Look for me and my content at EN World (user name: sanishiver). |
 |
|
Brimstone
Great Reader
    
USA
3290 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 19:10:36
|
Thanks for posting the link SFdragon! |
"These things also I have observed: that knowledge of our world is to be nurtured like a precious flower, for it is the most precious thing we have. Wherefore guard the word written and heed words unwritten and set them down ere they fade . . . Learn then, well, the arts of reading, writing, and listening true, and they will lead you to the greatest art of all: understanding." Alaundo of Candlekeep |
 |
|
Dalor Darden
Great Reader
    
USA
4211 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 19:41:17
|
Hehehehe...I said they would do this.
They are indeed testing the waters.
I think the reason they are skipping 2e right now is that it isn't really being skipped.
They may have planned a 3.5 publication, then a 2e publication, and a 1e publication came simply before the idea occured to them to re-release older material because Gary died and they wanted to make a tribute to him.
They have had so many pre-orders for the 1e books that they have had to push back publication and also expand it overseas. It isn't foolish of them to think that the same MAY happen for other editions.
Business is business...I'm glad they are moving towards a different business idea; and I can now see also why they removed the free for download content on their site. |
The Old Grey Box and AD&D for me! |
 |
|
Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief

    
USA
36877 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 19:56:35
|
I'm not sure if I'll buy the 3.5 books... I'm definitely getting the 1E ones; I really liked those books. And if they redo the 2E books, I'd buy them in a heartbeat. I've said more than once that I grew up in 2E, and still think of gaming stuff in 2E terms... The only reason I'm iffy on the 3.5 books is because they're recent enough that it's not terribly difficult to replace them. It's a different story for 1E and 2E. Heck, I've had to resign myself to the fact I'll never be able to replace my original copy of the DDG -- all the copies I've seen available, of late, were going for way too much and weren't in anywhere near as good a condition as the one I had. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!  |
Edited by - Wooly Rupert on 25 Jun 2012 20:05:27 |
 |
|
Hawkins
Great Reader
    
USA
2131 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 20:27:15
|
I find it odd that they skipped 2e. I also will not pay "premium" prices for books that I can get online. Though there are some 3.5 era books where the selling price online has jumped above $50. |
Errant d20 Designer - My Blog (last updated January 06, 2016)
One, two! One, two! And through and through The vorpal blade went snicker-snack! He left it dead, and with its head He went galumphing back. --Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking-Glass
"Mmm, not the darkness," Myrin murmured. "Don't cast it there." --Erik Scott de Bie, Shadowbane
* My character sheets (PFRPG, 3.5, and AE versions; not viewable in Internet Explorer) * Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Reference Document (PFRPG OGL Rules) * The Hypertext d20 SRD (3.5 OGL Rules) * 3.5 D&D Archives
My game design work: * Heroes of the Jade Oath (PFRPG, conversion; Rite Publishing) * Compendium Arcanum Volume 1: Cantrips & Orisons (PFRPG, designer; d20pfsrd.com Publishing) * Compendium Arcanum Volume 2: 1st-Level Spells (PFRPG, designer; d20pfsrd.com Publishing) * Martial Arts Guidebook (forthcoming) (PFRPG, designer; Rite Publishing)
|
Edited by - Hawkins on 25 Jun 2012 20:28:28 |
 |
|
Therise
Master of Realmslore
   
1272 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 20:38:36
|
No reason for me to buy them. Some people who collect might like that aspect of them (gilt page edges), but I already own a set of 3 and 3.5E. And as others said, errata are available for free.
Pathfinder, though I didn't get into it at all, supposedly fixes various mechanical issues and effectively replaces 3.5 (right?), so I'm not quite sure who their target market is for this. Maybe really old-timers who never made the jump to 2E or 3E? Or people who have lost or sold their old books?
Seems like a gamble, really.
|
Female, 40-year DM of a homebrew-evolved 1E Realms, including a few added tidbits of 2E and 3E lore; played originally in AD&D, then in Rolemaster. Be a DM for your kids and grandkids, gaming is excellent for families! |
Edited by - Therise on 25 Jun 2012 20:39:51 |
 |
|
Diffan
Great Reader
    
USA
4460 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 21:12:51
|
quote: Originally posted by Therise
Pathfinder, though I didn't get into it at all, supposedly fixes various mechanical issues and effectively replaces 3.5 (right?),
meh, it's debatable. Non-magical classes get a boost in terms of some good features and it's a far more modular system than v3.5 because each class has a ton of alternative class features to choose from. Additionally, they made most of the Core classes stronger thus limting the requirement of Prestige Classes in the game. But they don't fix quadratic wizards, linear fighters. They don't fix most of the problematic spells that are in the game, and they kept the BAB system which is arguably one of the worst ways in which to differentiate a good combat class from a poor one. But I think it's a good system overall and easily compatable with most of the v3.5 material. They have their own SRD site called d20pfsrd that pretty much lists everything you could want or use for running a Pathfinder game (including 3PP content).
quote: Originally posted by Therise
so I'm not quite sure who their target market is for this. Maybe really old-timers who never made the jump to 2E or 3E? Or people who have lost or sold their old books?
Seems like a gamble, really.
I'm not sure about who they're targeting too, but it's not really a gamble. Since they have all the prints for the stuff, I'm assuming that it doesn't cost that much to reprint them and they can print a little bit, sell what they want and either go ahead with more stuff or stop if the demand gets low. |
Diffan's NPG Generator: FR NPC Generator |
 |
|
Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief

    
USA
36877 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 22:41:03
|
quote: Originally posted by Diffan
I'm not sure about who they're targeting too, but it's not really a gamble. Since they have all the prints for the stuff, I'm assuming that it doesn't cost that much to reprint them and they can print a little bit, sell what they want and either go ahead with more stuff or stop if the demand gets low.
There's also the printing and distribution costs, which are the larger part part of publication expenses. If people don't buy the books, WotC loses money. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!  |
 |
|
Kiaransalyn
Senior Scribe
  
United Kingdom
762 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 23:08:21
|
quote: Originally posted by Ayrik
I'll ask the obvious question. Why jump from 1E to 3.5E, skipping 2E and 3E reprints?
That's a debate and a half. My own guess is that WotC want to explore the concept of supporting several editions maybe? After all, 3.5 is theirs, and it was popular. Pathfinder's success demonstrates that. However, reading Jason Buhlman's (sorry if I've spelt his name wrong) comments in Kobold Q' #10 it seems that one of Pathfinder's aims was to continue support for 3.5.
But maybe this is a question of whether folks hate the newer edition or the company. If there is a reasonable uptake on the 3.5 stuff, they may assume they can do some 'back-tracking' and recapture lost ground.
It's all speculation though. |
Death is Life Love is Hate Revenge is Forgiveness
Ken: You from the States? Jimmy: Yeah. But don't hold it against me. Ken: I'll try not to... Just try not to say anything too loud or crass. |
 |
|
Therise
Master of Realmslore
   
1272 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 23:43:11
|
Just occurred to me... didn't they offer fancy leather-bound 3.5 core books 5-6 years ago?
|
Female, 40-year DM of a homebrew-evolved 1E Realms, including a few added tidbits of 2E and 3E lore; played originally in AD&D, then in Rolemaster. Be a DM for your kids and grandkids, gaming is excellent for families! |
 |
|
Diffan
Great Reader
    
USA
4460 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 23:44:14
|
quote: Originally posted by Wooly Rupert
quote: Originally posted by Diffan
I'm not sure about who they're targeting too, but it's not really a gamble. Since they have all the prints for the stuff, I'm assuming that it doesn't cost that much to reprint them and they can print a little bit, sell what they want and either go ahead with more stuff or stop if the demand gets low.
There's also the printing and distribution costs, which are the larger part part of publication expenses. If people don't buy the books, WotC loses money.
Still, I have relative confidence that WotC wouldn't release a product without having some understanding of how much to print, who might buy it, and how much profit they'll gain. I personally have two copies of the v3.5 PHB so I really don't think I need another one, even if it has the revised Errata. Although there are collectors out there that revel in this sort of thing, so it might be right up their alley. |
Diffan's NPG Generator: FR NPC Generator |
 |
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
    
Australia
31799 Posts |
Posted - 26 Jun 2012 : 02:58:57
|
quote: Originally posted by sfdragon
http://www.wizards.com/DnD/Article.aspx?x=dnd/4news/20120625
seems 3.5 is getting a reprint, nothing FR sure... but it could be placed in the coment section
It's an interesting move.
My guess is, because the D&D Next Playtest material is showing so much love for particular aspects of the 3e/3.5e rules-set, Wizards might be on the path to establishing something of an easier path for those newcomers who may be unfamiliar with the past rules, to "catch up" so to speak... and become more accustomed to how these new rules will evolve. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)
"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood
Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage |
 |
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
    
Australia
31799 Posts |
Posted - 26 Jun 2012 : 03:02:47
|
quote: Originally posted by Ayrik
I'll ask the obvious question. Why jump from 1E to 3.5E, skipping 2E and 3E reprints?
Testing the waters, perhaps?
It's understandable for Wizards to reprint the 1e rulebooks. They're celebrating the origins of the game's foundations.
Reprinting the 3e rules, rather than the 2e rules, would seem more inclined toward celebrating the popularity of the 3e rules, and, perhaps, encouraging those past players/DMs who moved on from D&D when the 4e rules were published, and "luring" them back with the promise of something they'll be interested in. Plus, it's a nice little "stepping stone" toward what's been revealed about the D&D Next rules so far. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)
"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood
Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage |
 |
|
Diffan
Great Reader
    
USA
4460 Posts |
Posted - 26 Jun 2012 : 04:17:55
|
quote: Originally posted by The Sage
Reprinting the 3e rules, rather than the 2e rules, would seem more inclined toward celebrating the popularity of the 3e rules, and, perhaps, encouraging those past players/DMs who moved on from D&D when the 4e rules were published, and "luring" them back with the promise of something they'll be interested in. Plus, it's a nice little "stepping stone" toward what's been revealed about the D&D Next rules so far.
I haven't really seen anything in the Playtest packet or discussion on the Playtest that have any linking to a 3E-style game. They've said they want to make the Multiclass system more on-par from what we saw with 3E, which to me means a level-by-level progression where you can take 4 levels of Fighter, then 2 levels of Rogue and then back to 2 more levels of Fighter. They also said they liked the balance 4E brought to Multiclassing, with a feeling of 'dabbling' instead of getting all the class features up front and whole-hog.
Aside from that though, there's not much in D&D:Next that 3E can really claim. No BAB or THAC0 progression, no more Derived Saving Throws, no point-by-point skill allotments, no hard-coded Alignment rules featured into Class design or Spell Design (supposedly). So I think their hope is to get people to buy stuff that they might have misplaced, sold, or have worn out over the years. If v3.5 is as successful as many people claim, their PHBs and MMs and DMGs must be worn out pretty hard over the last decade, so now's a good chance to grab them brand new, special equipped with full errata and a nice binding. Still, hard to consider an expensive price when we have free online tools. |
Diffan's NPG Generator: FR NPC Generator |
 |
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
    
Australia
31799 Posts |
Posted - 26 Jun 2012 : 06:45:50
|
quote: Originally posted by Diffan
I haven't really seen anything in the Playtest packet or discussion on the Playtest that have any linking to a 3E-style game.
I'm not implying a link back to 3e-style games being incorporated into the D&D Next Playtest material. Merely noting, from my own experiences with the Playtest data, that there are moments when the "feeling of 3e" appears to shine through in some of the ways in which the rules and Playtest material has been formulated.
It's obvious that the folks behind the development of D&D Next have a real love for the strengths of the game from past editions. And I see a lot of love for 3e in these new Playtest rules. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)
"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood
Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage |
 |
|
Markustay
Realms Explorer extraordinaire
    
USA
15724 Posts |
Posted - 26 Jun 2012 : 14:37:10
|
I take this as a very positive thing - they are proving that they intend to support all editions/eras of play. |
"I have never in my life learned anything from any man who agreed with me" --- Dudley Field Malone
|
 |
|
Topic  |
|