Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 General Forgotten Realms Chat
 Composition of Armies in the Realms
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Myssa Rei
Acolyte

Philippines
22 Posts

Posted - 19 Nov 2006 :  05:07:16  Show Profile  Visit Myssa Rei's Homepage Send Myssa Rei a Private Message  Reply with Quote  Delete Topic
I've thrown this query at the WotC Boards to see what the people there think about it, rules-wise, so this time, I'm going to ask the about the lore-side of the equation from the folks over here.

The question is actually summed up in the Message title. The details are listed below.

If I'm remembering this correctly, armies, at least according to the DMG (which may have changed with Heroes of Battle, which I don't have at this point), are by default composed of conscripted commoners, with warriors and experts making the rank-and-file of the career soldiers and command staff, while adventuring classes either occupy the upper tier (officer positions) or existing as part of a 'strike force' type of special unit (and even then, they're not really that high a level to begin with).

However, this doesn't seem to be the case with armies in Faerun, as what I've read from the novels (and indeed, some of the web supplements, like Ed Greenwood's expanded description of the realms of the Border Kingdoms) seem to point to the fact that they're either entirely composed of adventuring classes (as in the case of the Elven Crusade led by Miritar), or mostly made up of adventuring classes (in the case of Cormyr's Purple Dragons).

Which now brings me to the heart of my quandry... As the armies of the Realms bear little resemblance to the 'default' armies presented in the DMG (which is assumed to be something a good-sized barony or small kingdom could field, I guess), what do you think would be their composition? Would they follow the integrated population ratio (37-20-18-10-7-5-2-1) for the class mixes, or it really depends on the kingdoms involved (for example, Thay's griffon cavalry seems to be composed entirely of wizards)?

Also, which class would fit into each of the said ratios. I see easily fighter-types being the most numerous in armies and take the highest numbers ratio, while the arcane spellcasting classes taking the last few lower ratios... But, after reading the Last Mythal series, it doesn't seem to be the general case either, as I perceived that there were a lot of arcane casters (aside from the so-called champions, who seem to be multi-classed fighter/clerics) in the elven army.

Finally, what would you think would be the average levels of the participants of a given army? I have a feeling that the Elven Crusade was an anachronism, in the sense it looked like it was composed of members with levels of 10-14, which is certainly not what you find in a normal army.

So, am I just thinking too much, and will have to take things on a case-to-case basis? Or is there a general pattern that armies follow in the Realms?

Never underestimate the power of a good story.

bitter thorn
Learned Scribe

USA
184 Posts

Posted - 19 Nov 2006 :  14:56:19  Show Profile  Visit bitter thorn's Homepage Send bitter thorn a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Like most things in the Realms it's going to vary quite a bit. I tend to stat career soldiers as fighters and/or marshals in places like Cormyr, Silver Marches etc. where conscriptiton isn't the norm. A dales militia, on the other hand could contain many voluteers that are 1st level commoners and experts or high level retired adventurers or all or the above. In short it will be driven by the setting/region and special circumstances.

"Nobody listens to the Ranger!"

Our groups are all sticking with 3.X classic Realms.
Go to Top of Page

dwarvenranger
Senior Scribe

USA
428 Posts

Posted - 20 Nov 2006 :  00:39:58  Show Profile  Visit dwarvenranger's Homepage Send dwarvenranger a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Myssa, one of the best breakdowns of a standing army was done by Walkerninja (the mans got too much time on his hands) for a campaign he was running a while back set in the Dalelands. The original copy of the diagram breaking down the various unit still hangs in our game room. I don't know if he has it on Word but it's definitely worth PMing him about it.

If I waited till I knew what I was doing, I'd never get anything done.

Go to Top of Page

Mace Hammerhand
Great Reader

Germany
2296 Posts

Posted - 21 Nov 2006 :  11:32:04  Show Profile  Visit Mace Hammerhand's Homepage Send Mace Hammerhand a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Rich Baker said, at one point, that the Elven Crusade's army consisted of fighters etc of lvl 5 and higher. Elves would probably have many bladesingers in their ranks, in addition to rangers and fighters with the occasional paladin.

The Purple Dragons probably also have a whole bunch of more experienced fighters and or knights, but with the recent "thinning" in the ranks of Cormyr's army there are probably fewer very experienced people. Same goes for the War Wizards, with the maximum caster level of probably 14 or so, considering that good old Vangey was "only" level 17 or so...

Mace's not so gentle gamer's journal My rants were harmless compared to this, beware!
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2025 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000