Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 General Forgotten Realms Chat
 Archaeology and Faerun Make Strange Bedfellows
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

KnightErrantJR
Great Reader

USA
5402 Posts

Posted - 24 Aug 2006 :  18:54:30  Show Profile  Visit KnightErrantJR's Homepage Send KnightErrantJR a Private Message  Reply with Quote  Delete Topic
Okay, so its not just Faerun, but that's part of the issue

Okay, we have already commented several times here at the keep that what amounts to an "adventurer archaeologist" PrC in Champions of Ruin, the Shade Hunter, is kind of strange in that you have to be evil to look for old Netherese magic and artifacts and take this PrC.

So along comes this month Dragon (347), and in the Class Acts section they have feats for "Archaeologist" type characters, and one of the feats, "Chronicle" seemed kind of cool, in that it lets you appraise an item's historical worth, allowing you to sell something for more than its worth if you find someone that is interested in the particular "historical bits" you discover. That sounds cool. Then I look at the prerequisites . . . I get the ranks in appraise and the intelligence thing, but "ability to cast arcane spells?"

To be fair, the feats appear in the "Arcane" section of Class Acts, but nothing about the feat ever mentions using magic or some kind of supernatural sense to tell the items history. It seems like they added the arcane thing just to fit with the theme of the article.

Still, I'm not trying to get too deep into this other than to say this:

If you have to either be evil or an arcane spellcaster to be a good archaeologist in the Realms, Indiana Jones would have a rough time in Faerun . . .

Kalin Agrivar
Senior Scribe

Canada
956 Posts

Posted - 24 Aug 2006 :  19:34:58  Show Profile  Visit Kalin Agrivar's Homepage Send Kalin Agrivar a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by KnightErrantJR

Okay, so its not just Faerun, but that's part of the issue

Okay, we have already commented several times here at the keep that what amounts to an "adventurer archaeologist" PrC in Champions of Ruin, the Shade Hunter, is kind of strange in that you have to be evil to look for old Netherese magic and artifacts and take this PrC.

So along comes this month Dragon (347), and in the Class Acts section they have feats for "Archaeologist" type characters, and one of the feats, "Chronicle" seemed kind of cool, in that it lets you appraise an item's historical worth, allowing you to sell something for more than its worth if you find someone that is interested in the particular "historical bits" you discover. That sounds cool. Then I look at the prerequisites . . . I get the ranks in appraise and the intelligence thing, but "ability to cast arcane spells?"

To be fair, the feats appear in the "Arcane" section of Class Acts, but nothing about the feat ever mentions using magic or some kind of supernatural sense to tell the items history. It seems like they added the arcane thing just to fit with the theme of the article.

Still, I'm not trying to get too deep into this other than to say this:

If you have to either be evil or an arcane spellcaster to be a good archaeologist in the Realms, Indiana Jones would have a rough time in Faerun . . .



I find there are is a lacking of PrCs of basic "professions" like archaeologist...or that they are too "fantastical"...

and old Dragon Magizine had two actually useful archaeology kits that I used...one for spellcatsres and one for non-spellcasters...

Kalin Xorell El'Agrivar

- High Mage of the Arcane Assembly
- Lore Keeper of the Vault of Ancestors
- 3rd Son of the Lord of the Stand
Go to Top of Page

Kalin Agrivar
Senior Scribe

Canada
956 Posts

Posted - 24 Aug 2006 :  19:51:11  Show Profile  Visit Kalin Agrivar's Homepage Send Kalin Agrivar a Private Message  Reply with Quote
oh, just to add..that is why I ahve turned to d20/non-WoTC materials...they often have PrCs that are more general than the WoTC stuff...kinda sucks that it is not admissable here

Kalin Xorell El'Agrivar

- High Mage of the Arcane Assembly
- Lore Keeper of the Vault of Ancestors
- 3rd Son of the Lord of the Stand
Go to Top of Page

KnightErrantJR
Great Reader

USA
5402 Posts

Posted - 24 Aug 2006 :  19:54:21  Show Profile  Visit KnightErrantJR's Homepage Send KnightErrantJR a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I liked the "necrotheologist" from Malhavoc's Requium for a God event books. I could actually picture some of them roaming the Realms doing research on various "dead" gods, and they struck me as vaguely "archaeological" if on a planar level.
Go to Top of Page

Kalin Agrivar
Senior Scribe

Canada
956 Posts

Posted - 24 Aug 2006 :  20:01:28  Show Profile  Visit Kalin Agrivar's Homepage Send Kalin Agrivar a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I don't know that one...

In Mongoose's Ultimate Prestige Class series (book I and II) there are basic "tomb raider"ish PrCs for lore, treasure and trap making/defeating that are good (with some tweaking)

in line with archeology, I have also been a little disappointed with the Loremaster PrC...it really isn't much of a sage...I have had players use the Rogue class (and it's 8 skill points/level) with that feat that allows skill access to all knowledge skills to make better sages...

Kalin Xorell El'Agrivar

- High Mage of the Arcane Assembly
- Lore Keeper of the Vault of Ancestors
- 3rd Son of the Lord of the Stand
Go to Top of Page

Ardashir
Senior Scribe

USA
544 Posts

Posted - 25 Aug 2006 :  00:08:59  Show Profile  Visit Ardashir's Homepage Send Ardashir a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Just what basic character classes would make for good Faerunian archaeologists, anyway? I figure the list begins with the rogue, the wizard, and the bard.
Go to Top of Page

Conlon
Learned Scribe

Canada
132 Posts

Posted - 25 Aug 2006 :  00:42:23  Show Profile  Visit Conlon's Homepage Send Conlon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Or Priests devoted to the accumulation of lore or artifacts..

My hopes are ashes, my dreams are dust. All my intentions mean nothing unless they are followed by action.
Go to Top of Page

Rinonalyrna Fathomlin
Great Reader

USA
7106 Posts

Posted - 25 Aug 2006 :  03:18:34  Show Profile  Visit Rinonalyrna Fathomlin's Homepage Send Rinonalyrna Fathomlin a Private Message  Reply with Quote
The protagonist from The Lost Library of Cormanthyr was an archeologist ranger.

I basically agree, you shouldn't have to be a mage to be interested in artifacts (much less evil!).

"Instead of asking why we sleep, it might make sense to ask why we wake. Perchance we live to dream. From that perspective, the sea of troubles we navigate in the workaday world might be the price we pay for admission to another night in the world of dreams."
--Richard Greene (letter to Time)
Go to Top of Page

The Sage
Procrastinator Most High

Australia
31772 Posts

Posted - 25 Aug 2006 :  05:36:39  Show Profile Send The Sage a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Rinonalyrna Fathomlin

The protagonist from The Lost Library of Cormanthyr was an archeologist ranger.
That was Baylee.

I'm still not sure I like the name.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)

"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood

Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage
Go to Top of Page

The Sage
Procrastinator Most High

Australia
31772 Posts

Posted - 25 Aug 2006 :  05:39:15  Show Profile Send The Sage a Private Message  Reply with Quote
And now that I think about it, have we ever seen a 3e update for the "Lorefinder" kit presented in Demihumans of the Realms. I don't recall...

That passes for an "archaeologist" basis of sorts, that allows for any alignment type (though rarely evil).

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)

"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood

Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage

Edited by - The Sage on 25 Aug 2006 05:44:38
Go to Top of Page

Sanishiver
Senior Scribe

USA
476 Posts

Posted - 25 Aug 2006 :  06:29:04  Show Profile  Visit Sanishiver's Homepage Send Sanishiver a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by kalin agrivar

oh, just to add..that is why I ahve turned to d20/non-WoTC materials...they often have PrCs that are more general than the WoTC stuff...kinda sucks that it is not admissable here
Why wouldn't they be? I like to use D20 material in my own Realms campaign and would think many others do as well.

Heck, even if you're just commenting on them I would think that'd be fine. There's a strong tradtion of Realms DMs adopting good ideas/rules from wherever they can find them. No reason to stop now.
.....
Looking at the article, I can see Knight's point. I'd cut that prereq out entirely and not substitute any other requirement for it. I think that feat should have more benefit to Bards and Loremaster types that can make class-based checks to 'know' something about just about anything already.

J. Grenemyer

09/20/2008: Tiger Army at the Catalyst in Santa Cruz. You wouldn’t believe how many females rode it out in the pit. Santa Cruz women are all of them beautiful. Now I know to add tough to that description.
6/27/2008: WALL-E is about the best damn movie Pixar has ever made. It had my heart racing and had me rooting for the good guy.
9/9/2006: Dave Mathews Band was off the hook at the Shoreline Amphitheater.

Never, ever read the game books too literally, or make such assumptions that what is omitted cannot be. Bad DM form, that.

And no matter how compelling a picture string theory paints, if it does not accurately describe our universe, it will be no more relevant than an elaborate game of Dungeons and Dragons. --paragraph 1, chapter 9, The Elegant Universe by Brian Greene
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000