Author |
Topic |
GothicDan
Master of Realmslore
USA
1103 Posts |
Posted - 13 Aug 2006 : 21:09:14
|
Ed's reply concerning the rumors of the EV's allied lich gaining power directly from nature is just that - a rumor. In FR, he says that divine magic comes from deities. |
Planescape Fanatic
"Fiends and Undead are the peanut butter and jelly of evil." - Me "That attitude should be stomped on, whenever and wherever it's encountered, because it makes people holding such views bad citizens, not just bad roleplayers (considering D&D was structured as a 'forced cooperation' game, and although successive editions are pointing it more and more towards a me-first, min-max game, the drift away from 'we all need each other to succeed' will at some point make it 'no longer' D&D)." - ED GREENWOOD |
|
|
Zanan
Senior Scribe
Germany
942 Posts |
Posted - 13 Aug 2006 : 22:07:43
|
quote: Originally posted by GothicDan
Ed's reply concerning the rumors of the EV's allied lich gaining power directly from nature is just that - a rumor. In FR, he says that divine magic comes from deities.
That is not a rumour ... it is fact and as such (you know the word coming your way:) canon. p. 85 of Champions of Ruin. The rumour was just a way of introducing the character, not the things he afterwards taught to the EV.
Well, archivists are a very good addition to the standard classes. As I said, they will have patrons as anyone else, but whether that patron is the one who hands out the divine spells - especially if these divine spells come from ... say the druids spell list is another matter. Maybe someone will FRize the archivists some day and let us know. |
Cave quid dicis, quando et cui!
Gęš a wyrd swa hio scel!
In memory of Alura Durshavin.
Visit my "Homepage" to find A Guide to the Drow NPCs of Faerūn, Drow and non-Drow PrC and much more. |
|
|
GothicDan
Master of Realmslore
USA
1103 Posts |
Posted - 13 Aug 2006 : 22:09:47
|
And Ed said that he THOUGHT that he was not getting his power from a deity. It is in fact being granted by one, in secret. |
Planescape Fanatic
"Fiends and Undead are the peanut butter and jelly of evil." - Me "That attitude should be stomped on, whenever and wherever it's encountered, because it makes people holding such views bad citizens, not just bad roleplayers (considering D&D was structured as a 'forced cooperation' game, and although successive editions are pointing it more and more towards a me-first, min-max game, the drift away from 'we all need each other to succeed' will at some point make it 'no longer' D&D)." - ED GREENWOOD |
|
|
Kazzaroth
Learned Scribe
Finland
104 Posts |
Posted - 14 Aug 2006 : 00:08:18
|
What comes to archivist I myself have started recently play one and my char is coming from Candlekeep. I would imagine every bloody monk from Candlekeep is actually archivist or archivist/monk if we go more martial focused archivist ;). I would imagine most scholars would be archivists if not bardic sages. |
|
|
Zanan
Senior Scribe
Germany
942 Posts |
Posted - 14 Aug 2006 : 09:49:37
|
quote: Originally posted by Kazzaroth
What comes to archivist I myself have started recently play one and my char is coming from Candlekeep. I would imagine every bloody monk from Candlekeep is actually archivist or archivist/monk if we go more martial focused archivist ;). I would imagine most scholars would be archivists if not bardic sages.
As I said, a decent class indeed and very useful.
GD ... I think we have to wait and see. This whole druidic patron business needs a shake-up, since we have a limited (and maybe not exclusive) list in the FRCS (with non-nature deities included), but various rangers of non-nature deities in various adventures et al. All tweak canon here and there and I for one wouldn't have a problem if nature as such can be the source of the spells, even though the character might have a patron deity that has not exactly something to do with nature. Many Underdark races would rejoice here. |
|
|
GothicDan
Master of Realmslore
USA
1103 Posts |
Posted - 14 Aug 2006 : 10:05:49
|
That really doesn't have much to do with what I was saying, does it Zanan?
Nature itself is Chauntea, in FR, anyway. All of Abeir-Toril is just her physical manifestation - literally, according to Ed, not metaphorically. |
Planescape Fanatic
"Fiends and Undead are the peanut butter and jelly of evil." - Me "That attitude should be stomped on, whenever and wherever it's encountered, because it makes people holding such views bad citizens, not just bad roleplayers (considering D&D was structured as a 'forced cooperation' game, and although successive editions are pointing it more and more towards a me-first, min-max game, the drift away from 'we all need each other to succeed' will at some point make it 'no longer' D&D)." - ED GREENWOOD |
|
|
Zanan
Senior Scribe
Germany
942 Posts |
Posted - 14 Aug 2006 : 10:57:55
|
quote: Originally posted by GothicDan
That really doesn't have much to do with what I was saying, does it Zanan?
Nature itself is Chauntea, in FR, anyway. All of Abeir-Toril is just her physical manifestation - literally, according to Ed, not metaphorically.
It has. In so far that - with all due respect to Ed - there is nothing in the book that hints on any nature deity backing up what the lich teaches and what the EV druids / rangers / et al do. I know the rules, I know the ifs and buts, but the mentioned text just adds something "new" (as was e.g. the one step rule). Whether this will be changed or whether there is a (non-elven) deity actually backing this remains to be seen. |
Cave quid dicis, quando et cui!
Gęš a wyrd swa hio scel!
In memory of Alura Durshavin.
Visit my "Homepage" to find A Guide to the Drow NPCs of Faerūn, Drow and non-Drow PrC and much more. |
|
|
Kazzaroth
Learned Scribe
Finland
104 Posts |
Posted - 14 Aug 2006 : 20:56:17
|
In my opinion the druids or rangers supporting EV can worship any neutral deity, even Malar in extend that they focus their hunting towards humans examply. There is little information about the inviduals and actual divine magics to be used in EV at all and generall. Only known fact is that how the EV was founded, what are the key people and that they likely have wizards and such and lich whit green dragon. |
|
|
Kalin Agrivar
Senior Scribe
Canada
956 Posts |
Posted - 14 Aug 2006 : 21:02:45
|
quote: Originally posted by GothicDan
Nature itself is Chauntea, in FR, anyway. All of Abeir-Toril is just her physical manifestation - literally, according to Ed, not metaphorically.
Then how does Silvanus fit in to that then?
oh, and I have a general question for everybody...I saw the word "heresy"...is heresy what P.O.s the God or does the god's organized church deem what heresy is...in a world where the gods directly impact their worshipers...
Like the Helmites plundering of Maztica or Lathander's identy crisis? |
Kalin Xorell El'Agrivar
- High Mage of the Arcane Assembly - Lore Keeper of the Vault of Ancestors - 3rd Son of the Lord of the Stand |
|
|
Zanan
Senior Scribe
Germany
942 Posts |
Posted - 14 Aug 2006 : 21:08:36
|
Without checking for definitions et al, IMHO herecy is something within a faith. Such as sects or cults interpreting the dogma of a deity other than the mainstream clergy did/does. The latter will view the former as heretics.
If you broaden the point of view, a quasi-monotheistic society (such as a drow city ruled and dominated by Lolthites) may view any mentioning, support or the like of another deity or any actions against e.g. Lolth as herecy too. |
Cave quid dicis, quando et cui!
Gęš a wyrd swa hio scel!
In memory of Alura Durshavin.
Visit my "Homepage" to find A Guide to the Drow NPCs of Faerūn, Drow and non-Drow PrC and much more. |
Edited by - Zanan on 14 Aug 2006 21:09:33 |
|
|
Kalin Agrivar
Senior Scribe
Canada
956 Posts |
Posted - 14 Aug 2006 : 21:16:07
|
quote: Originally posted by Zanan
Without checking for definitions et al, IMHO herecy is something within a faith. Such as sects or cults interpreting the dogma of a deity other than the mainstream clergy did/does. The latter will view the former as heretics.
If you broaden the point of view, a quasi-monotheistic society (such as a drow city ruled and dominated by Lolthites) may view any mentioning, support or the like of another deity or any actions against e.g. Lolth as herecy too.
I agree with that...
but then you have to consider that the rules like "only females" or "only elves", etc. maybe just a churches dogma..not a direct edict from the power...
my point is (and this point could have been made in many threads), in a world where a god's life and power is dependent on the amount of true worshippers they have, a god may not have the luxury to be picky in the worshipper's race...and a 3rd Ed. erased out pretty much all racial/class restrictions then
thus it may be church dogma that a sun elf wouldn't worship Vhaerun or a meazel may be a paladin of Tyr or a kobald a cleric of Garl Glittergold or etc. etc. etc.
like I said in a past thread I think all that matters to a god is what/where/why the heart, spirit and soul of a worshipper is
|
Kalin Xorell El'Agrivar
- High Mage of the Arcane Assembly - Lore Keeper of the Vault of Ancestors - 3rd Son of the Lord of the Stand |
|
|
GothicDan
Master of Realmslore
USA
1103 Posts |
Posted - 14 Aug 2006 : 23:31:21
|
quote: It has. In so far that - with all due respect to Ed - there is nothing in the book that hints on any nature deity backing up what the lich teaches and what the EV druids / rangers / et al do. I know the rules, I know the ifs and buts, but the mentioned text just adds something "new" (as was e.g. the one step rule). Whether this will be changed or whether there is a (non-elven) deity actually backing this remains to be seen.
So what if the book doesn't say anything about it? *Confused* |
Planescape Fanatic
"Fiends and Undead are the peanut butter and jelly of evil." - Me "That attitude should be stomped on, whenever and wherever it's encountered, because it makes people holding such views bad citizens, not just bad roleplayers (considering D&D was structured as a 'forced cooperation' game, and although successive editions are pointing it more and more towards a me-first, min-max game, the drift away from 'we all need each other to succeed' will at some point make it 'no longer' D&D)." - ED GREENWOOD |
|
|
GothicDan
Master of Realmslore
USA
1103 Posts |
Posted - 14 Aug 2006 : 23:32:01
|
quote: Then how does Silvanus fit in to that then?
Silvanus is a known Interloper deity from Earth. |
Planescape Fanatic
"Fiends and Undead are the peanut butter and jelly of evil." - Me "That attitude should be stomped on, whenever and wherever it's encountered, because it makes people holding such views bad citizens, not just bad roleplayers (considering D&D was structured as a 'forced cooperation' game, and although successive editions are pointing it more and more towards a me-first, min-max game, the drift away from 'we all need each other to succeed' will at some point make it 'no longer' D&D)." - ED GREENWOOD |
|
|
Zanan
Senior Scribe
Germany
942 Posts |
Posted - 15 Aug 2006 : 10:17:27
|
quote: Originally posted by GothicDan
quote: It has. In so far that - with all due respect to Ed - there is nothing in the book that hints on any nature deity backing up what the lich teaches and what the EV druids / rangers / et al do. I know the rules, I know the ifs and buts, but the mentioned text just adds something "new" (as was e.g. the one step rule). Whether this will be changed or whether there is a (non-elven) deity actually backing this remains to be seen.
So what if the book doesn't say anything about it? *Confused*
Dunno what is confusing about the above? CoR says that the lich druid has found a way to draw his powers from "divine nature" itself rather from a nature deity. That contradicts previous lore, of course (as did the one step rulings on a clerics alignment, which IMHO is more often than not unreasonable). It's something "new" to the system of drawing "divine" power for spellcasting - IMHO a good addition. Whether this will be changed in books and lore to come, we will see. If Ed says that there is or might be a deity behind .. no problem over here. It's just not canon as yet. (And I hope it will stay as it is ... or the druid deity list gets a major shake-up.) |
Cave quid dicis, quando et cui!
Gęš a wyrd swa hio scel!
In memory of Alura Durshavin.
Visit my "Homepage" to find A Guide to the Drow NPCs of Faerūn, Drow and non-Drow PrC and much more. |
|
|
GothicDan
Master of Realmslore
USA
1103 Posts |
Posted - 15 Aug 2006 : 10:35:55
|
It is canon, because Ed's words are canon and it hasn't been contradicted by a more modern sourcebook. That's what I mean. :) |
Planescape Fanatic
"Fiends and Undead are the peanut butter and jelly of evil." - Me "That attitude should be stomped on, whenever and wherever it's encountered, because it makes people holding such views bad citizens, not just bad roleplayers (considering D&D was structured as a 'forced cooperation' game, and although successive editions are pointing it more and more towards a me-first, min-max game, the drift away from 'we all need each other to succeed' will at some point make it 'no longer' D&D)." - ED GREENWOOD |
|
|
Jorkens
Great Reader
Norway
2950 Posts |
Posted - 15 Aug 2006 : 11:02:22
|
Well, I am of the impression that ( unfortunately) Eds words do not triumph published cannon, so the lich druid still officially stands as drawing its power from nature. I could be wrong about this although. I agree with the notion that a divinity is needed, so the explanation for the lich does not work for me personally. |
|
|
Zanan
Senior Scribe
Germany
942 Posts |
Posted - 15 Aug 2006 : 12:35:50
|
quote: Originally posted by GothicDan
It is canon, because Ed's words are canon and it hasn't been contradicted by a more modern sourcebook. That's what I mean. :)
That'll be a vein discussion ... and so far, as you said it yourself, he has not exactly spoken about that lich's resources as such (more like a rumour he whispered) nor the archivist's actual power source, for that matter. Yet, as he resides nearby, how about asking him more directly? |
|
|
Kuje
Great Reader
USA
7915 Posts |
Posted - 15 Aug 2006 : 15:27:51
|
Ed has answered the "it draws on nature" question either in 2005 or 2006. Look through the table of contents/index of his replies.
It's a July 13, 2005 entry. |
For some of us, books are as important as almost anything else on earth. What a miracle it is that out of these small, flat, rigid squares of paper unfolds world after world, worlds that sing to you, comfort and quiet and excite you... Books are full of the things that you don't get in real life - wonderful, lyrical language, for instance, right off the bat. - Anne Lamott, Bird by Bird
Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium |
Edited by - Kuje on 15 Aug 2006 15:31:20 |
|
|
GothicDan
Master of Realmslore
USA
1103 Posts |
Posted - 15 Aug 2006 : 23:31:29
|
Thanks, Kuje. :) |
Planescape Fanatic
"Fiends and Undead are the peanut butter and jelly of evil." - Me "That attitude should be stomped on, whenever and wherever it's encountered, because it makes people holding such views bad citizens, not just bad roleplayers (considering D&D was structured as a 'forced cooperation' game, and although successive editions are pointing it more and more towards a me-first, min-max game, the drift away from 'we all need each other to succeed' will at some point make it 'no longer' D&D)." - ED GREENWOOD |
|
|
Zanan
Senior Scribe
Germany
942 Posts |
Posted - 16 Aug 2006 : 10:12:58
|
For those interested ... The Hooded One's reply on Ed's behalf, important bits regarding the topic underlined:
quote: July 13, 2005: Hello again, fellow scribes.
Kuje, Ed hasn't forgotten your Purple Lady queries, and will reply soon. In the meantime, however, he answers your divine spells question:
In 2nd Edition, 1st and 2nd level spells could be gained or renewed without direct connection to any deity (and so were obtainable during a Godswar, as I suggested in DRAGON #54, and we later all saw in the Time of Troubles). As a general rule, divine spells should be granted by deities (or their servant creatures) only as a result of direct prayer: in other words, yes, divine casters must worship a specific deity and not a cause or broad aspect.
However (weasel time), there will be exceptions, because in the endless game of one-up-god-ship that Faerūnian deities play, subtly struggling for supremacy over each other, dominance over intelligent races and events that affect their societies, and defense of personal portfolios, gods (and their loyal servant creatures) will often grant spells to mortals "out of the blue," or under false pretenses, or whatever - - just to try to influence those events and achieve some unknown-to-mortals aim or temporary victory in the ongoing godly struggle. As I've said before, there are secrets about the gods I can't yet reveal, but all of this boils down to: MOST divine casters get their spells by praying directly to a deity and serving that deity adequately (serve poorly, and your prayers may not be answered at all; serve superbly, and you may even receive extra magic), but A FEW divine casters may, for indefinite periods, receive spells when venerating only a cause, broad aspect, or even a dead or "the wrong" god. So saith Ed.
Exhibiting his usual love for compromise and all-inclusive attempts to please.
love to all, THO
|
Cave quid dicis, quando et cui!
Gęš a wyrd swa hio scel!
In memory of Alura Durshavin.
Visit my "Homepage" to find A Guide to the Drow NPCs of Faerūn, Drow and non-Drow PrC and much more. |
|
|
GothicDan
Master of Realmslore
USA
1103 Posts |
Posted - 16 Aug 2006 : 10:22:39
|
Temporarily being the key word. |
Planescape Fanatic
"Fiends and Undead are the peanut butter and jelly of evil." - Me "That attitude should be stomped on, whenever and wherever it's encountered, because it makes people holding such views bad citizens, not just bad roleplayers (considering D&D was structured as a 'forced cooperation' game, and although successive editions are pointing it more and more towards a me-first, min-max game, the drift away from 'we all need each other to succeed' will at some point make it 'no longer' D&D)." - ED GREENWOOD |
|
|
Zanan
Senior Scribe
Germany
942 Posts |
Posted - 16 Aug 2006 : 11:40:16
|
quote: Originally posted by GothicDan
Temporarily being the key word.
Of course. Who knows, maybe they cast that into stone some day ... this drawing from nature itself, obviously |
|
|
GothicDan
Master of Realmslore
USA
1103 Posts |
Posted - 16 Aug 2006 : 12:18:53
|
And since nature is Toril and Toril is Chauntea, that would work for me just fine. :) |
Planescape Fanatic
"Fiends and Undead are the peanut butter and jelly of evil." - Me "That attitude should be stomped on, whenever and wherever it's encountered, because it makes people holding such views bad citizens, not just bad roleplayers (considering D&D was structured as a 'forced cooperation' game, and although successive editions are pointing it more and more towards a me-first, min-max game, the drift away from 'we all need each other to succeed' will at some point make it 'no longer' D&D)." - ED GREENWOOD |
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|