Author |
Topic |
|
scererar
Master of Realmslore
USA
1618 Posts |
Posted - 20 Feb 2006 : 07:07:23
|
I stumbled across this site the other day and just wanted to share. Has anyone else found this site to be useful? anyways check it out, I thought that it is very useful.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Faer%C3%BBn
|
Edited by - scererar on 20 Feb 2006 07:08:19
|
|
Beirnadri Magranth
Senior Scribe
USA
720 Posts |
Posted - 20 Feb 2006 : 14:38:06
|
I dont use that page of wikipedia. it seems basic info. however it does have alot fo different pages on faerun/FR. Besides this House Baenre Page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Baenre), it has articles on individual members as well. Wikipedia is a great site and has pages on many other realms snippets as well. |
"You came here to be a martyr in a great big bang of glory... instead you will die with a whimper." ::moussaoui tries to interrupt:: "You will never get a chance to speak again and that's an appropriate ending."
-Judge Brinkema |
|
|
Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
USA
36814 Posts |
Posted - 20 Feb 2006 : 15:06:40
|
I've got a large amount of the Realms products, so I tend to rely on them. If I'm looking for information, I'll either ask here about it or I'll look online long enough to know what books to look in. There's a lot of FR info online, but not all of it is accurate or even canon. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen! |
|
|
Horatio
Seeker
Israel
59 Posts |
Posted - 20 Feb 2006 : 15:09:47
|
Yes, I can also confirm it only has basic info. A lot of the deities are missing (or categorized as "stubs"). Cormyr, for instance, has only half a page written on it. Besides, it's the wiki-- can't always trust the validity of the information there. |
|
|
scererar
Master of Realmslore
USA
1618 Posts |
Posted - 20 Feb 2006 : 17:11:39
|
thanks all for the feedback, I will be careful of this as it appears to have quite a few links, I thought it seemed more complete than everyone is saying. I try to maintain with canon info, so I will stick to my source books and this site . |
|
|
Faraer
Great Reader
3308 Posts |
Posted - 20 Feb 2006 : 18:02:20
|
The well-trafficked parts of Wikipedia are as reliable as print encyclopedias (you always have to apply judgement). The Realms entries, though, are error-filled, even for being sketchy. |
|
|
|
Topic |
|