Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 General Forgotten Realms Chat
 Ranger/Druid Multiclass
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Gerath Hoan
Learned Scribe

United Kingdom
152 Posts

Posted - 04 Dec 2005 :  11:18:40  Show Profile Send Gerath Hoan a Private Message  Reply with Quote  Delete Topic
Hi there...

I was offered the opportunity to play in someone else's campaign as
a player for the first time in ages. Wanting to exercise some creativity i intend to revive a long disused character idea and play a Wood Elf Ranger/Druid. However this is calling into question my knowledge of the 3.5 rules system.

My question to the knowledgable scribes of Candlekeep is this: Does the Druid's weapon restrictions mean that i can't use all my martial weapon proficiencies i get from Ranger levels? I know there are specific sanctions for a Druid who wears armour not allowed by their class restrictions, but from the wording of the PHB 3.5 entry, it is unclear whether or not this carries over to weapon selection as well. I've even checked the downloaded FAQ on the Wizards website, but it makes no mention of this issue.

I'm aware that Ranger/Druids of Mielikki are exempt from this restriction, but i am playing a Wood Elf and would prefer to dedicate my character to an Elven god or goddess.

Any opinions from my fellow scribes would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

GH

Knight of the Order of the Keen Eye - Granted by Ed Greenwood, 30th January 2005

Kentinal
Great Reader

4689 Posts

Posted - 04 Dec 2005 :  11:37:59  Show Profile Send Kentinal a Private Message  Reply with Quote
The way I understand it, you are not subject to weapon restriction once taking a Ranger level, the chaecter just becomes proficient in more weapons.

"Small beings can have small wisdom," the dragon said. "And small wise beings are better than small fools. Listen: Wisdom is caring for afterwards."
"Caring for afterwards ...? Ker repeated this without understanding.
"After action, afterwards," the dragon said. "Choose the afterwards first, then the action. Fools choose action first."
"Judgement" copyright 2003 by Elizabeth Moon
Go to Top of Page

Arivia
Great Reader

Canada
2965 Posts

Posted - 04 Dec 2005 :  11:45:03  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Gerath Hoan

Hi there...

I was offered the opportunity to play in someone else's campaign as
a player for the first time in ages. Wanting to exercise some creativity i intend to revive a long disused character idea and play a Wood Elf Ranger/Druid. However this is calling into question my knowledge of the 3.5 rules system.

My question to the knowledgable scribes of Candlekeep is this: Does the Druid's weapon restrictions mean that i can't use all my martial weapon proficiencies i get from Ranger levels? I know there are specific sanctions for a Druid who wears armour not allowed by their class restrictions, but from the wording of the PHB 3.5 entry, it is unclear whether or not this carries over to weapon selection as well. I've even checked the downloaded FAQ on the Wizards website, but it makes no mention of this issue.

I'm aware that Ranger/Druids of Mielikki are exempt from this restriction, but i am playing a Wood Elf and would prefer to dedicate my character to an Elven god or goddess.

Any opinions from my fellow scribes would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

GH



Weapon restrictions don't apply in 3.5-see the second paragraph of Weapons and Armor Profiencies in the druid entry in the PHB for what is restricted. They did apply in 3.0, though(hence the Nature Deities sidebar in F&P).
Go to Top of Page

Crennen FaerieBane
Master of Realmslore

USA
1378 Posts

Posted - 04 Dec 2005 :  14:47:52  Show Profile Send Crennen FaerieBane a Private Message  Reply with Quote
The only thing you might have to worry about is the class restrictions on gaining levels. If you multiclass, you may ake a -10% penalty on experience if the levels are not within one of each other.

C-Fb

Still rockin' the Fey'ri style.
Go to Top of Page

Gerath Hoan
Learned Scribe

United Kingdom
152 Posts

Posted - 04 Dec 2005 :  15:19:59  Show Profile Send Gerath Hoan a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Thanks for the answers guys.

I've not done a lot of gaming in the new 3.5 rules so it was making my head hurt a bit trying to figure out what i could and couldn't get away with.

I'm happy sticking to the armour restrictions of being a Druid, but with my Ranger levels i'm hoping to make my character into quite the archer.

And yes, i do plan on keeping the levels close enough to avoid XP penalty. I do remember that rule at least!

Many thanks again,

GH

Knight of the Order of the Keen Eye - Granted by Ed Greenwood, 30th January 2005
Go to Top of Page

Alparon
Seeker

Turkey
67 Posts

Posted - 04 Dec 2005 :  18:51:15  Show Profile  Visit Alparon's Homepage Send Alparon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
still it would be a powerplay character, i don't recommend it

I am Cyric, the One and the All, God of Murder and Intrigue, Patron of Deception and Chaos, Prince of Lies, the Dark Sun, rightful Lord of the Dead, Cyric-on-a-stick, and known to some as "the Mad God." I welcome you to The Land of the Dead...
Go to Top of Page

Arivia
Great Reader

Canada
2965 Posts

Posted - 05 Dec 2005 :  12:41:03  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Alparon

still it would be a powerplay character, i don't recommend it





A Druid/Ranger is a perfectly viable combination flavor-wise; what are you going on about?
Go to Top of Page

Crennen FaerieBane
Master of Realmslore

USA
1378 Posts

Posted - 05 Dec 2005 :  15:10:22  Show Profile Send Crennen FaerieBane a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I don't see any problem with a Druid/Ranger. It's not like in 2E where you gain levels in both. If you're a 10th level Ranger and a 10th level Druid (barring Epic play), you're a pretty well rounded woodlands devoted character - not power gaming at all really.

C-Fb

Still rockin' the Fey'ri style.
Go to Top of Page

Chosen of Bane
Senior Scribe

USA
552 Posts

Posted - 05 Dec 2005 :  15:32:46  Show Profile  Visit Chosen of Bane's Homepage Send Chosen of Bane a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I don't know if the poster was trying to get a rise out of people, thinks that any multi-classing is powergaming, or is just plane wrong.

There are no two classes that mesh better flavor-wise than the Ranger and Druid (the cleric-paladin maybe be equal).

And from a powergaming standpoint, anytime you lose 10 levels from a strong spellcasting class you are not powergaming. I think a Druid 20 is going to outshine a Ranger 10/Druid 10.
Go to Top of Page

Forge
Learned Scribe

USA
218 Posts

Posted - 05 Dec 2005 :  16:14:58  Show Profile  Visit Forge's Homepage Send Forge a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Well, also when you consider the overlap of abilities from the 2 classes, Animal Companion, Spells, etc... Hard to consider it a powerplay.
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36804 Posts

Posted - 05 Dec 2005 :  17:09:33  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Arivia

quote:
Originally posted by Alparon

still it would be a powerplay character, i don't recommend it





A Druid/Ranger is a perfectly viable combination flavor-wise; what are you going on about?



It's especially viable considering that in 2E, even though druids had to be true N, Mielikki was still served by druid/rangers.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Gerath Hoan
Learned Scribe

United Kingdom
152 Posts

Posted - 05 Dec 2005 :  19:54:57  Show Profile Send Gerath Hoan a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I'm certainly not motivated by powergaming in my choice here.

I'm really losing out on some of what's most fun about being a druid (more uses of the wild shape ability, high level spellcasting) and losing out on being more powerful in combat (thanks to sacrificing all those Ranger levels). At the same time though, i'm getting what i think is a well rounded and self-sufficient character.

And agreed, the overlap of abilities, such as animal companion and wild empathy, actually makes this particular combination a bad choice for power gamers.

It looks very characterful and a lot of fun though. It really gets my memories of Warhammer Wood Elves going, which should bring out some different roleplaying qualities than my usual D&D Elven characters - and that's always the best reason to choose a particular character concept isn't it? I'm even picking a god i've never used for a priestly character before in Solonor Thelandira, which presents a whole new set of challanges and opportunities.

Let me know what you guys think,

GH

Oh, and whilst i'm thinking, i won't have to keep the levels of the two classes close to each other as some scribes mentioned, because the Ranger is the Wood Elf's favoured class. I could be a Ranger 3/Druid 8 (or whatever) without experience penalty.

Knight of the Order of the Keen Eye - Granted by Ed Greenwood, 30th January 2005

Edited by - Gerath Hoan on 05 Dec 2005 19:57:15
Go to Top of Page

KnightErrantJR
Great Reader

USA
5402 Posts

Posted - 05 Dec 2005 :  19:58:24  Show Profile  Visit KnightErrantJR's Homepage Send KnightErrantJR a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I was going to mention the Ranger/Favored Class thing, but once the forums went wonky, it kind of slipped my mind . . .
Go to Top of Page

Purple Dragon Knight
Master of Realmslore

Canada
1796 Posts

Posted - 05 Dec 2005 :  22:23:52  Show Profile Send Purple Dragon Knight a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Elf ranger/druid? make sure you own a copy of Races of the Wild... the Leafsomething armor might interest you!
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000