Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 Running the Realms
 Backstabbing
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Echon
Senior Scribe

Denmark
422 Posts

Posted - 09 Dec 2002 :  21:09:32  Show Profile  Visit Echon's Homepage Send Echon a Private Message  Reply with Quote  Delete Topic
I have been unsuccesful in the attempt to find any rules about weapons suitable for backstabbing. So far I have looked in Player's Handbook, Dungeon Master's Guide and The Complete Thief's Handbook.

Currently I have allowed thieves the usage of knives, daggers and short swords. In Baldur's Gate it was possible to backstab with long swords, scimitars and katanas as well but they may have made that up.

What do the official rules say?

-Echon

"If others had not been foolish, we should be so."

-William Blake

Lord Rad
Great Reader

United Kingdom
2080 Posts

Posted - 09 Dec 2002 :  21:15:22  Show Profile  Visit Lord Rad's Homepage Send Lord Rad a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I havent seen anything official but I suppose I always imagined it to be a SMALL weapon such as a dagger as it can be gripped and wielded close to the opponents body. Saying that, a Short Sword is classed as a size S but has more of a sweeping attack rather than a lunge and stabbing action. It depends if you look at it practically or just as a rule mechanic.

Then again, (im probably not helping here with my post ), backstabbing doesnt necessarily mean backSTABBING, merely a rear undetected attack using stealth, in which case a long sword as you mention would be perfectly acceptable.

Personally im going to stick to only allowing small weapons that dont require a swinging action (i.e. daggers!)

Lord Rad

"What? No, I wasn't reading your module. I was just looking at the pictures"
Go to Top of Page

Echon
Senior Scribe

Denmark
422 Posts

Posted - 09 Dec 2002 :  21:25:55  Show Profile  Visit Echon's Homepage Send Echon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Rad

I havent seen anything official but I suppose I always imagined it to be a SMALL weapon such as a dagger as it can be gripped and wielded close to the opponents body. Saying that, a Short Sword is classed as a size S but has more of a sweeping attack rather than a lunge and stabbing action. It depends if you look at it practically or just as a rule mechanic.


The damage type of a short sword is piercing and not slashing which indicates a thrust and not a swing. Still, it is a matter of preference.

quote:
Then again, (im probably not helping here with my post ), backstabbing doesnt necessarily mean backSTABBING, merely a rear undetected attack using stealth, in which case a long sword as you mention would be perfectly acceptable.


Absolutely true. However, a problem arises if allowing a long sword because then some player is going to argue that a broad sword could be used and then a two-handed sword etc.

Regarding the backstabbing, using a blunt weapon such a club might knock a person unconscious.

quote:
Personally im going to stick to only allowing small weapons that dont require a swinging action (i.e. daggers!)


I was considering allowing a spear, the small, one-handed type. Then again, perhaps I should not. Things could easily get out of control.

-Echon

"If others had not been foolish, we should be so."

-William Blake
Go to Top of Page

Frey
Learned Scribe

130 Posts

Posted - 10 Dec 2002 :  23:04:38  Show Profile  Visit Frey's Homepage Send Frey a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I stab with anything. A nail will do and an arrow will do better. Just be creative and imagine a picture of the action. knitting-needles, letter openers, ballpoints, loads of agricultural tools.

But what is a ballpoint?

When in doubt, consult your DM

- Imagine ... there's no imagination. -

(remember Frey is just a PC)

Edited by - Frey on 10 Dec 2002 23:05:37
Go to Top of Page

Frey
Learned Scribe

130 Posts

Posted - 10 Dec 2002 :  23:08:49  Show Profile  Visit Frey's Homepage Send Frey a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Frey
When in doubt, consult your DM

Sorry, forgot where I was

- Imagine ... there's no imagination. -

(remember Frey is just a PC)
Go to Top of Page

Cherrn
Learned Scribe

Denmark
323 Posts

Posted - 11 Dec 2002 :  03:16:39  Show Profile Send Cherrn a Private Message  Reply with Quote
How about any weapon that can be used in 1 hand without special training ?(Leaves bastard sword out) Thats the formula i always used with regards to backstabbin'.

A wise man from Calimport once told me: "If a merchant puts sand in the flask of oil he's trying to sell you, then he isn't trying to sell you sand..."
Go to Top of Page

Echon
Senior Scribe

Denmark
422 Posts

Posted - 11 Dec 2002 :  08:39:03  Show Profile  Visit Echon's Homepage Send Echon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Frey
When in doubt, consult your DM


The problem is that I am the DM. Who do DMs go to consult?

-Echon

"If others had not been foolish, we should be so."

-William Blake

Edited by - Echon on 11 Dec 2002 08:39:48
Go to Top of Page

Echon
Senior Scribe

Denmark
422 Posts

Posted - 11 Dec 2002 :  08:41:17  Show Profile  Visit Echon's Homepage Send Echon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Cherrn

How about any weapon that can be used in 1 hand without special training ?(Leaves bastard sword out) Thats the formula i always used with regards to backstabbin'.



I suppose that rule is a 3E thingy?

-Echon

"If others had not been foolish, we should be so."

-William Blake
Go to Top of Page

Mumadar Ibn Huzal
Master of Realmslore

1338 Posts

Posted - 11 Dec 2002 :  09:01:29  Show Profile Send Mumadar Ibn Huzal a Private Message  Reply with Quote
That's not really a 3e rule. Actually the term backstabbing as an attack no longer exists in 3e. It is now called a sneak attack, and can be used with any melee weapon, provided the circumstances are there and the character in question does have the ability to make a sneak attack.

For second edition, I could imagine ruling more or less the same, any melee weapon goes. But the speedfactor of the weapon could serve as a penalty, making a two-handed sword a lot less likely to be used in a backstab attack...
Go to Top of Page

Ghost
Acolyte

Netherlands
38 Posts

Posted - 11 Dec 2002 :  18:40:01  Show Profile  Visit Ghost's Homepage Send Ghost a Private Message  Reply with Quote
In 3e you can also 'sneak attack' with a ranged weapon, within a certain range (standard range is 30 ft).
In 2e, I would suggest that you can 'backstab' with any melee weapon from the thief weapon list. This includes the long sword (for medium characters), but excludes the 2-handed sword.

The way of a superior man are three-fold;
virtuous, he is free from anxieties;
wise, he is free from perplexities;
bold, he is free from fear. ~ Confucius

Edited by - Ghost on 11 Dec 2002 18:40:25
Go to Top of Page

Ghost
Acolyte

Netherlands
38 Posts

Posted - 11 Dec 2002 :  18:44:26  Show Profile  Visit Ghost's Homepage Send Ghost a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Frey

I stab with anything. A nail will do and an arrow will do better. Just be creative and imagine a picture of the action. knitting-needles, letter openers, ballpoints, loads of agricultural tools.

But what is a ballpoint?

When in doubt, consult your DM



An arrow is not really a good choice. If you hold onto the shaft of the arrow close to the point, it will not penetrate very far. If you place your hand further from the point, the shaft of the arrow may snap, instead of entering the body. Better to use a bolt in such cases..

The way of a superior man are three-fold;
virtuous, he is free from anxieties;
wise, he is free from perplexities;
bold, he is free from fear. ~ Confucius
Go to Top of Page

Artalis
Senior Scribe

USA
444 Posts

Posted - 19 Dec 2002 :  22:25:45  Show Profile Send Artalis a Private Message  Reply with Quote
In my opinion Backstabbing is based on the knowledge of anatomy. Specifically where one can do the most damage with an attack against an unaware opponent. Therefore I allow any weapon that can be brought to bear stealthily to be used. (no flails since the chain makes noise and so on...)

A hammer can be used a the base of the skull or the temple, a blade of any kind between the ribs and shoulder blades and so on. It's all about knowing your opponents physiology.

With that in mind I don't allow backstab attacks with damage multipliers against non-humaniod opponents whom the backstabber doesn't know the physiology of like a dragon for a thief who hasn't studied or fought one before.

Artalis

Email


Go to Top of Page

Kitira Gildragon
Learned Scribe

USA
191 Posts

Posted - 20 Dec 2002 :  12:50:08  Show Profile  Visit Kitira Gildragon's Homepage Send Kitira Gildragon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Hmmm. You pose a good question. Were I a DM, I think I would limit the use of backstabbing weapons to small weapons including the short sword. I used the Sword +3 of backstabbing (can't remember if it was a short or long sword...HELP!) and dagger of venom with my theif. <Talk about heaven...>
As for the backstabbing, I believe it's just that. Not an unguarded attack [ie. slash], but a physical STAB.
Just my 2cp

-Space for rent-
Go to Top of Page

Echon
Senior Scribe

Denmark
422 Posts

Posted - 25 Jan 2003 :  12:50:21  Show Profile  Visit Echon's Homepage Send Echon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
(2nd Edition)

Player's Handbook claims that the bonus for a rear attack when backstabbing is +4 while Dungeon Master's Guide says only +2. Which is true?

-Echon

"If others had not been foolish, we should be so."

-William Blake
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000