Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 General Forgotten Realms Chat
 Any scribes at Gencon?
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

Faraer
Great Reader

3308 Posts

Posted - 26 Aug 2004 :  16:19:49  Show Profile  Visit Faraer's Homepage Send Faraer a Private Message  Reply with Quote
GamingReport.com has posted a report and pictures of the Forgotten Realms seminar at Gen Con.

If I'd made it across the water, I wonder how I'd have approached the WotC panelists about the Realmslore backlog and all the existing dungeons and regional information and merchant lore and ... we haven't seen...

Edited by - Faraer on 26 Aug 2004 16:21:07
Go to Top of Page

SiriusBlack
Great Reader

USA
5517 Posts

Posted - 29 Aug 2004 :  17:54:13  Show Profile  Visit SiriusBlack's Homepage Send SiriusBlack a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Sean K. Reynolds has a report of his Gencon experience including pictures.
Go to Top of Page

The Sage
Procrastinator Most High

Australia
31774 Posts

Posted - 30 Aug 2004 :  03:53:29  Show Profile Send The Sage a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Faraer

GamingReport.com has posted a report and pictures of the Forgotten Realms seminar at Gen Con.

If I'd made it across the water, I wonder how I'd have approached the WotC panelists about the Realmslore backlog and all the existing dungeons and regional information and merchant lore and ... we haven't seen...

I think that's something we'd all like to ask ourselves if we were to be confronted with a similar situation such as this...

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)

"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood

Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage
Go to Top of Page

Garen Thal
Master of Realmslore

USA
1105 Posts

Posted - 30 Aug 2004 :  04:08:18  Show Profile  Visit Garen Thal's Homepage Send Garen Thal a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Having been confronted with that exact situation, I can tell you what I said about missing dungeons, unrevealed Realmslore, merchant lore, climate patterns, and...

Nothing.

I said nothing for a pair of fairly important reasons. First was that I know that it's the sort of complaint that isn't going to be listened to from some Realms fanboy in the crowd (whether he knows his stuff or not), because I wouldn't have the time to back it up. My primary objective in that particular seminar was to steer the single WotC representative--Chris Perkins--into including the sorts of information I like to see in my books, rather than standing up and shouting "we want Realmslore." I saved that for afterwards.

The second was one that doesn't really need to be made, but which I'll make anyway: Eric Boyd and Ed Greenwood were two of the four panelists at the FR seminar. If there's anyone who already knows what sort of stuff people like the Candlekeep audience want to see, and is in a position to demand/ensure that they get into books, it's those two.

There are other reasons, too, not least of which is that I know from other conversations that the "pendulum of fluff vs. crunch" overswang toward game mechanics after the release of 3e, and is going to be recentered as things go forward to include more flavor (for FR, read Realmslore), so I felt no need to stand up and shout my lungs out. They've heard us. It's just a matter of finding a place to put it all, and then listening to the groans when it doesn't all fit.

That's just what I think, though. And what do I know?
Go to Top of Page

George Krashos
Master of Realmslore

Australia
6666 Posts

Posted - 30 Aug 2004 :  04:17:17  Show Profile Send George Krashos a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Well said, Garen.

I for one have been very happy with the "new" direction FR products seem to be heading in. As I've said before, late-2004 and 2005 augur well for FR products. Even the fanboys should be satisfied.

-- George Krashos

"Because only we, contrary to the barbarians, never count the enemy in battle." -- Aeschylus
Go to Top of Page

SiriusBlack
Great Reader

USA
5517 Posts

Posted - 30 Aug 2004 :  14:24:01  Show Profile  Visit SiriusBlack's Homepage Send SiriusBlack a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Garen Thal
I know from other conversations that the "pendulum of fluff vs. crunch" overswang toward game mechanics after the release of 3e, and is going to be recentered as things go forward to include more flavor (for FR, read Realmslore),



So, what you are saying is that a balance will return to the force....

oh wait, wrong campaign world.

quote:

That's just what I think, though. And what do I know?



Quite a bit purely judging from this post. If nothing else you possess the ability to calmly and intelligently present your points. Such a trait is a rarity these days. Thank you for sharing.

SB
Go to Top of Page

SiriusBlack
Great Reader

USA
5517 Posts

Posted - 30 Aug 2004 :  14:29:00  Show Profile  Visit SiriusBlack's Homepage Send SiriusBlack a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by George Krashos
I for one have been very happy with the "new" direction FR products seem to be heading in. As I've said before, late-2004 and 2005 augur well for FR products. Even the fanboys should be satisfied.

-- George Krashos




GK:

I keep hearing your comments in my head as I see the date drawing ever so closer to Shining South's release. October is not that far off.
Go to Top of Page

Faraer
Great Reader

3308 Posts

Posted - 30 Aug 2004 :  15:47:29  Show Profile  Visit Faraer's Homepage Send Faraer a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Sure. It would depend on the climate of the thing, and I'd want to come up with a slightly new angle (point of leverage) rather than repeating a known point of view.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000