Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 General Forgotten Realms Chat
 will primal spirits survive to 5e?
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

silverwolfer
Senior Scribe

789 Posts

Posted - 23 May 2014 :  05:59:59  Show Profile Send silverwolfer a Private Message  Reply with Quote  Delete Topic
So things like the world serphant and the earthmother, were classified as primal spirits. How do you think they will survive the new incarnation of 5e?

JohnLynch
Learned Scribe

Australia
243 Posts

Posted - 23 May 2014 :  11:32:48  Show Profile Send JohnLynch a Private Message  Reply with Quote
They'll be worshipped and have shamans as their servants. I don't see a need to go into any further distinction between primal spirit vs god.

DM of the Realms: A blog for my Forgotten Realms adventures.
Go to Top of Page

hashimashadoo
Master of Realmslore

United Kingdom
1159 Posts

Posted - 23 May 2014 :  17:29:04  Show Profile  Visit hashimashadoo's Homepage Send hashimashadoo a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Yeah, but gods like Eldath were bumped down to primal spirit in 4e and they had temples and clerics, etc.

Perhaps some primal spirits will become gods once more?

When life turns it's back on you...sneak attack for extra damage.

Head admin of the FR wiki:

https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/
Go to Top of Page

sfdragon
Great Reader

2285 Posts

Posted - 23 May 2014 :  20:07:34  Show Profile Send sfdragon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I for one hope they get rid of that term. All it did ti some degree was confuse more people with conflicting lore...

why is being a wizard like being a drow? both are likely to find a dagger in the back from a rival or one looking to further his own goals, fame and power


My FR fan fiction
Magister's GAmbit
http://steelfiredragon.deviantart.com/gallery/33539234
Go to Top of Page

sleyvas
Skilled Spell Strategist

USA
12229 Posts

Posted - 24 May 2014 :  00:45:02  Show Profile Send sleyvas a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I kind of have to agree. The latest thing seems to be to spin up terms and not give a basis for their differences.... Archfey, Primordials, Primal Spirits.... It would be interesting if they'd put some more of a definition to these.

Alavairthae, may your skill prevail

Phillip aka Sleyvas
Go to Top of Page

JohnLynch
Learned Scribe

Australia
243 Posts

Posted - 24 May 2014 :  04:20:03  Show Profile Send JohnLynch a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by hashimashadoo

Yeah, but gods like Eldath were bumped down to primal spirit in 4e and they had temples and clerics, etc.
That makes the difference even more esoteric a and obscure.

quote:
Originally posted by hashimashadoo

Perhaps some primal spirits will become gods once more?

My point was If primal spirits can grant spells to clerics, what's the difference between primal spirits and gods? I expect 5th edition won't explore that distinction as it seems to have no meaningful and doesn't seem to effect their followers or even their clergy. If you're asking will Eldath survive then almost definitely yes. If you're asking will the term primal spirits survive, my thinking is there MIGHT be the term thrown in somewhere in the books, but unless there's a meaningful distinction then I expect it won't be used much more than once (if that).

DM of the Realms: A blog for my Forgotten Realms adventures.
Go to Top of Page

Gyor
Master of Realmslore

1632 Posts

Posted - 24 May 2014 :  13:40:52  Show Profile Send Gyor a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Yes, some Barbarian builds use primal magic.
Go to Top of Page

Gyor
Master of Realmslore

1632 Posts

Posted - 24 May 2014 :  13:45:10  Show Profile Send Gyor a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Yes, some Barbarian builds use primal magic.
Go to Top of Page

Shemmy
Senior Scribe

USA
492 Posts

Posted - 24 May 2014 :  19:46:37  Show Profile  Visit Shemmy's Homepage Send Shemmy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
It and various other 4e core terms should probably vanish for coherency of lore. You don't maintain continuity by insisting on keeping that which broke continuity.

Shemeska the Marauder, King of the Crosstrade; voted #1 best Arcanaloth in Sigil two hundred years running by the people who know what's best for them; chant broker; prospective Sigil council member next election; and official travel agent for Chamada Holiday specials LLC.
Go to Top of Page

Brian R. James
Forgotten Realms Game Designer

USA
1098 Posts

Posted - 25 May 2014 :  17:27:37  Show Profile  Visit Brian R. James's Homepage Send Brian R. James a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I for one hope they keep the terms, though I doubt they will.

I see these different terms for the various types of powerful beings as being more expressive. Why lump these beings under one umbrella when you can have archdevils, demon lords, immortals, primordials, archfey, and primal spirits. Sure, any of these beings could be worshiped as gods by primitive mortals, but that doesn't change their underlying physiology or cosmic outlook.

To me Asmodeus is far more interesting as "just" an archdevil. Why does he need to be a god? Same with Lolth. In 1st-Edition AD&D she was just a powerful demon queen. And so on and so forth... The Earthmother makes far more sense as a primal spirit, just as Kossuth is clearly a primordial.

Brian R. James - Freelance Game Designer

Follow me on Twitter @brianrjames
Go to Top of Page

Tarlyn
Learned Scribe

USA
315 Posts

Posted - 25 May 2014 :  19:24:02  Show Profile Send Tarlyn a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Shemmy
It and various other 4e core terms should probably vanish for coherency of lore. You don't maintain continuity by insisting on keeping that which broke continuity.


+1. Did anyone else find it really annoying that instead of silver and gold elves the Sunderings series just refers to eladrin? It isn't even more descriptive. It is just confusing/annoying.

As a side note, archdevils and demon lords are definitely not exclusively 4e terms. I think the archfey or fey lord concept existed in D&D outside of 4e as well. However, I am not 100% confident on that.

Tarlyn Embersun
Go to Top of Page

sleyvas
Skilled Spell Strategist

USA
12229 Posts

Posted - 25 May 2014 :  20:35:58  Show Profile Send sleyvas a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Brian R. James

I for one hope they keep the terms, though I doubt they will.

I see these different terms for the various types of powerful beings as being more expressive. Why lump these beings under one umbrella when you can have archdevils, demon lords, immortals, primordials, archfey, and primal spirits. Sure, any of these beings could be worshiped as gods by primitive mortals, but that doesn't change their underlying physiology or cosmic outlook.

To me Asmodeus is far more interesting as "just" an archdevil. Why does he need to be a god? Same with Lolth. In 1st-Edition AD&D she was just a powerful demon queen. And so on and so forth... The Earthmother makes far more sense as a primal spirit, just as Kossuth is clearly a primordial.



I don't mind them keeping the term, as long as there is something of a clear definition of the difference. For instance, a demon lord versus an archdevil, I get the difference. However, primal spirit and primordial and Archfey are less clear (other than I would say an Archfey is tied to the feywild).

Alavairthae, may your skill prevail

Phillip aka Sleyvas
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2026 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000