Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Realmslore
 Realms Events
 Lathander's Second Dawn
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 3

DDH_101
Master of Realmslore

Canada
1272 Posts

Posted - 14 Mar 2005 :  04:18:53  Show Profile  Visit DDH_101's Homepage Send DDH_101 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Well, right now you are taking a pretty big step in changing the rules that were set into Forgotten Realms. It's not just as simply having all gods take mortal forms like during the Times of Trouble.

"Trust in the shadows, for the bright way makes you an easy target." -Mask
Go to Top of Page

Manix
Acolyte

4 Posts

Posted - 15 Mar 2005 :  07:09:48  Show Profile  Visit Manix's Homepage Send Manix a Private Message  Reply with Quote
True, but I would like to see a change that would be memorable. Mabey not having all the gods end up in mortal form, but I see the Second Dawn as having some huge ramifications for the realms. I don't see this as being something that will go unnoticed by the general populace. I am just trying to figure out what will happen, and any way that it would affect the characters, or that I can throw them into the mix.

Manix
Out
Go to Top of Page

Ty
Learned Scribe

USA
168 Posts

Posted - 17 Mar 2005 :  22:26:46  Show Profile  Visit Ty's Homepage Send Ty a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I personally wonder how the tri-partite Lathander/Amaunator/Myrkul thing may play into this.
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36804 Posts

Posted - 17 Mar 2005 :  23:08:00  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Ty

I personally wonder how the tri-partite Lathander/Amaunator/Myrkul thing may play into this.



Huh? Are you saying that Myrkul is the third incarnation of Amaunator and Lathander? That can't be right...

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Ty
Learned Scribe

USA
168 Posts

Posted - 17 Mar 2005 :  23:40:27  Show Profile  Visit Ty's Homepage Send Ty a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Well... no. And yes. Originally, his portfolio did include dusk.

As I recall Eric Boyd looked at it (I think it was him at least ) there are three aspects to the "sun god" of the Realms. One is morning, the second is noon/afternoon and the third is of course dusk/night. I recall the image of a three sided pyramid (or a four sided dice) sitting on a rotating plate for instance. If you looked directly forward, and an angle perpendicular to the center of the pyramid, as the plate spun you would alternatively see one or two of the faces of the pyramid, but never all three.

Thus, if you place the phases of the sun onto the pyramid, you have morning followed by afternoon followed by dusk, followed by morning, afternoon, dusk, morning, afternoon, dusk, ad infinitum. It was then explained (this I recall was a hypothesis) that you could have a god of the dusk and a god of the morning at the same time (Myrkul and Lathander), but eventually dusk would fade to completely morning (Lathander). As the plate spins, you see two faces of the pyramid again, morning and afternoon (Lathander and Amaunator). Let it spin more and you'll have just afternoon (Amaunator). Keep going and we have afternoon and dusk (Amaunator and Myrkul).

What's ironic is that this theory of the ascendancy of the god of the sun holds true according to the realms history. Dusk wasn't part of Jergal's original portfolio during the time of Amaunator (the first of the three gods we know of relating to this theory). Amaunator is the only sun god. Over time, Myrkul arises as Amaunator dies. Someone else did the timeline here and I *think* it worked out roughly. Then, we have Myrkul and Lathander coming 'round. Now, we only have Lathander, with a hint of the return of Amaunator.

Again, not my theory, but the one postulated by certain Realms authors as I understand it. Which we all know of course could be patently absurd.

Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36804 Posts

Posted - 18 Mar 2005 :  01:11:16  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Ty

Well... no. And yes. Originally, his portfolio did include dusk.

As I recall Eric Boyd looked at it (I think it was him at least ) there are three aspects to the "sun god" of the Realms. One is morning, the second is noon/afternoon and the third is of course dusk/night. I recall the image of a three sided pyramid (or a four sided dice) sitting on a rotating plate for instance. If you looked directly forward, and an angle perpendicular to the center of the pyramid, as the plate spun you would alternatively see one or two of the faces of the pyramid, but never all three.

Thus, if you place the phases of the sun onto the pyramid, you have morning followed by afternoon followed by dusk, followed by morning, afternoon, dusk, morning, afternoon, dusk, ad infinitum. It was then explained (this I recall was a hypothesis) that you could have a god of the dusk and a god of the morning at the same time (Myrkul and Lathander), but eventually dusk would fade to completely morning (Lathander). As the plate spins, you see two faces of the pyramid again, morning and afternoon (Lathander and Amaunator). Let it spin more and you'll have just afternoon (Amaunator). Keep going and we have afternoon and dusk (Amaunator and Myrkul).

What's ironic is that this theory of the ascendancy of the god of the sun holds true according to the realms history. Dusk wasn't part of Jergal's original portfolio during the time of Amaunator (the first of the three gods we know of relating to this theory). Amaunator is the only sun god. Over time, Myrkul arises as Amaunator dies. Someone else did the timeline here and I *think* it worked out roughly. Then, we have Myrkul and Lathander coming 'round. Now, we only have Lathander, with a hint of the return of Amaunator.

Again, not my theory, but the one postulated by certain Realms authors as I understand it. Which we all know of course could be patently absurd.





My problem with the idea of Myrkul being part of that cycle: Two facets being active at once. If one god slowly morphs into another, then you're not going to have two aspects active at once. Further, Lathander is still referred to as being young, and yet Myrkul was around for a while. Lastly, Myrkul could have grabbed dusk somewhere along the way.

I think it more likely that the third aspect is some forgotten deity.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Ty
Learned Scribe

USA
168 Posts

Posted - 18 Mar 2005 :  02:48:35  Show Profile  Visit Ty's Homepage Send Ty a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I'm not fond of Myrkul's inclusion into the theory, but it does work from a purely mechanical perspective. Of course, we'll never know about the origin of Myrkul's ascendancy to divinity or even the timing of his acquisition of the portfolio of dusk. Of course, the more I think about it now, it could have been Jergal as the original holder of dusk (without a corresponding acknowledgement in the Netheril boxed set), but again, that's speculation. Jergal alone, with all his portfolio's was a much stronger deity than any individual god such as Bane, Bhaal, or Myrkul. Perhaps his passing off of certain portfolio's served as the catalyst for the resurgence of the god of Morning.

I'm not so sure I'd use the term "morph" though. I view it more as a matter of waxing and waning from birth to death. You can then have two present with one slowly dying (or passing to obscurity) and the other slowly gaining strength. If you examine the "gap period" between Amaunator and Lathander, you'll probably find it to be a very short gap. Similarly, if you narrow down the period of Amaunator's death, I'm laying odds that Lathander arose shortly thereafter.

Much to ponder and I certainly don't have the answers. I merely question whether a hypothesis advanced regarding the waxing/waning of the sun god is tied to the activities of Lathander moving forward in time. Questions, questions...
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36804 Posts

Posted - 18 Mar 2005 :  03:47:09  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Ty

I'm not fond of Myrkul's inclusion into the theory, but it does work from a purely mechanical perspective. Of course, we'll never know about the origin of Myrkul's ascendancy to divinity or even the timing of his acquisition of the portfolio of dusk. Of course, the more I think about it now, it could have been Jergal as the original holder of dusk (without a corresponding acknowledgement in the Netheril boxed set), but again, that's speculation. Jergal alone, with all his portfolio's was a much stronger deity than any individual god such as Bane, Bhaal, or Myrkul. Perhaps his passing off of certain portfolio's served as the catalyst for the resurgence of the god of Morning.

I'm not so sure I'd use the term "morph" though. I view it more as a matter of waxing and waning from birth to death. You can then have two present with one slowly dying (or passing to obscurity) and the other slowly gaining strength. If you examine the "gap period" between Amaunator and Lathander, you'll probably find it to be a very short gap. Similarly, if you narrow down the period of Amaunator's death, I'm laying odds that Lathander arose shortly thereafter.

Much to ponder and I certainly don't have the answers. I merely question whether a hypothesis advanced regarding the waxing/waning of the sun god is tied to the activities of Lathander moving forward in time. Questions, questions...



The thing is, I've not before seen Myrkul listed in that trio. And Amaunator and Lathander did not exist at the same time. So if noon and dawn weren't around at the same time, why would dusk and dawn be around at the same time (at least, until dusk lost his godhood)?

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Ty
Learned Scribe

USA
168 Posts

Posted - 18 Mar 2005 :  14:55:33  Show Profile  Visit Ty's Homepage Send Ty a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Mrykul's inclusion into that may be faults in my own recollection of the theory Wooly. I have a tendency to mash things together. I premise his inclusion on his original portfolio inclusion of dusk and that's what I recall the original theory espousing. I of course, could be wrong and to be honest, I wish I knew for the life of me where I thought I read that.

As for Amaunator and Lathander not being around at the same time, maybe this will help a bit.

Start: Morning alone.

Step 1: Morning fades to rising Noon/Afternoon.

Step 2. Noon/Afternoon alone.

Step 3: Noon/Afternoon fades to rising Dusk.

Step 4: Dusk Alone.

Step 5: Dusk fades to rising Morning.

Step 6: Morning alone (cycle repeats).

Now, at the time of Netheril, the earliest dating I've found for a god holding the portfolio related to the cycles of the sun, we have Amaunator for certain. Jergal may or may not have had dusk. Thus, at the time of Netheril, we at least had the presence of Step 2. If Jergal had dusk as a portfolio, then we're at Step 3.

Then we move on to Netheril falling, and Amaunator suffering an abrupt drop in worship and eventually, he dies from lack of worship. No set time is given for that death. However, we also have Myrkul rising I believe somewhere between 200 DR and 700 DR. I am extrapolating this from someone else's analysis of the rise of Bane as a power. I assume that Myrkul, as one of the trio, followed a similar "arc" in his rise to divinity if you would.

Now, assuming Amaunator lingers for a time, say three or four hundred years before ultimately kicking the bucket, we have, probably, an overlap of time where Amaunator is pathetically weak and Myrkul is just starting to ascend. Then, we hit Step 4. This is a weak spot in my analysis since I have no clue as to when Lathander ascended to divinity but we find no real mention of him in the history of Netheril or other cultures.

I am left to assume that he must have arisen a short time after Amaunator's ultimate demise, and shortly after Myrkul achieved his divinity. This completes Step 5. Over time, Myrkul waxes and then wanes and he dies during the Time of Troubles. Worshippers carry on for a few decades but for all intents and purposes, he is dead, while Lathander waxes. This moves us to Step 6. Lathander is the only god holding the portfolio related to the cycles of the sun, and is the current status of things.

Now, what I wonder is if the Second Dawn Cataclysm hinted at in Faiths and Pantheons will render Step 1 or 2 "in play". I personally think this may be hinted at (or at least the stage set for it) after reading information on the Sunmasters in Lost Empires of Faerun. Clearly we're at Step 6. Are the Sunmasters the start of Step 1 and the Second Dawn Cataclysm building up will yield a full demise of Lathander and the ascendancy of a god with the noon/afternoon aspect under Step 2? That's my only postulation really.

This is of course, my musings on it. Under the stages listed above, Amanautor and Lathander can only be simultaneously "alive" during Step 1. From the looks of past cycles, the stages where two gods are alive seem much longer than the stages where only one aspect of the cycle of the sun is alive. It also makes sense if you go back to the Pyramid example. Seeing only one face of the pyramid as it rotates has a negligble time period in comparison to when you can see two sides.

At the time of Amaunator in Netheril, you couldn't have had Lathander and Amaunator alive at the same time. The aspect of Morning's time had long passed. Prior to the recorded history of Netheril, it certainly was possible, but we just don't have the historical information from that period laid out quite as well for us to accurately state anything about it. To any extent, it's an interesting theory, but again, its just a theory until the game designers make it so.
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36804 Posts

Posted - 18 Mar 2005 :  23:17:24  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Ty

Mrykul's inclusion into that may be faults in my own recollection of the theory Wooly. I have a tendency to mash things together. I premise his inclusion on his original portfolio inclusion of dusk and that's what I recall the original theory espousing. I of course, could be wrong and to be honest, I wish I knew for the life of me where I thought I read that.

As for Amaunator and Lathander not being around at the same time, maybe this will help a bit.

Start: Morning alone.

Step 1: Morning fades to rising Noon/Afternoon.

Step 2. Noon/Afternoon alone.

Step 3: Noon/Afternoon fades to rising Dusk.

Step 4: Dusk Alone.

Step 5: Dusk fades to rising Morning.

Step 6: Morning alone (cycle repeats).

Now, at the time of Netheril, the earliest dating I've found for a god holding the portfolio related to the cycles of the sun, we have Amaunator for certain. Jergal may or may not have had dusk. Thus, at the time of Netheril, we at least had the presence of Step 2. If Jergal had dusk as a portfolio, then we're at Step 3.

Then we move on to Netheril falling, and Amaunator suffering an abrupt drop in worship and eventually, he dies from lack of worship. No set time is given for that death. However, we also have Myrkul rising I believe somewhere between 200 DR and 700 DR. I am extrapolating this from someone else's analysis of the rise of Bane as a power. I assume that Myrkul, as one of the trio, followed a similar "arc" in his rise to divinity if you would.

Now, assuming Amaunator lingers for a time, say three or four hundred years before ultimately kicking the bucket, we have, probably, an overlap of time where Amaunator is pathetically weak and Myrkul is just starting to ascend. Then, we hit Step 4. This is a weak spot in my analysis since I have no clue as to when Lathander ascended to divinity but we find no real mention of him in the history of Netheril or other cultures.

I am left to assume that he must have arisen a short time after Amaunator's ultimate demise, and shortly after Myrkul achieved his divinity. This completes Step 5. Over time, Myrkul waxes and then wanes and he dies during the Time of Troubles. Worshippers carry on for a few decades but for all intents and purposes, he is dead, while Lathander waxes. This moves us to Step 6. Lathander is the only god holding the portfolio related to the cycles of the sun, and is the current status of things.

Now, what I wonder is if the Second Dawn Cataclysm hinted at in Faiths and Pantheons will render Step 1 or 2 "in play". I personally think this may be hinted at (or at least the stage set for it) after reading information on the Sunmasters in Lost Empires of Faerun. Clearly we're at Step 6. Are the Sunmasters the start of Step 1 and the Second Dawn Cataclysm building up will yield a full demise of Lathander and the ascendancy of a god with the noon/afternoon aspect under Step 2? That's my only postulation really.

This is of course, my musings on it. Under the stages listed above, Amanautor and Lathander can only be simultaneously "alive" during Step 1. From the looks of past cycles, the stages where two gods are alive seem much longer than the stages where only one aspect of the cycle of the sun is alive. It also makes sense if you go back to the Pyramid example. Seeing only one face of the pyramid as it rotates has a negligble time period in comparison to when you can see two sides.

At the time of Amaunator in Netheril, you couldn't have had Lathander and Amaunator alive at the same time. The aspect of Morning's time had long passed. Prior to the recorded history of Netheril, it certainly was possible, but we just don't have the historical information from that period laid out quite as well for us to accurately state anything about it. To any extent, it's an interesting theory, but again, its just a theory until the game designers make it so.



I don't think enough time passed for there to have anyone between Amaunator and Lathander. We know Amaunator was around until at least -339 DR, and we know that Lathander was worshipped in Athalantar by 3rd Century DR -- only 5 or 6 centuries later. Further, Myrkul wasn't worshipped in Netheril, because he and his buds had not yet gained their portfolios from Jergal. So Myrkul would have had to have risen somewhere after the Fall, as well. This means that he and Lathander were both rising at the same time, or within a few centuries of each other -- which makes it difficult for Myrkul to have been part of that cycle.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Ty
Learned Scribe

USA
168 Posts

Posted - 19 Mar 2005 :  01:34:57  Show Profile  Visit Ty's Homepage Send Ty a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Good points on the dates. Perhaps we have to look for some as yet unnamed deity being around in those six centuries between Amaunator and Lathander. Clearly Myrkul then doesn't work quite as neatly in this theory.
Go to Top of Page

ode904
Learned Scribe

Finland
193 Posts

Posted - 01 Jul 2005 :  22:56:03  Show Profile Send ode904 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I have it and i have to check it myself...
Go to Top of Page

Gray Richardson
Master of Realmslore

USA
1291 Posts

Posted - 03 Jul 2005 :  16:22:04  Show Profile  Visit Gray Richardson's Homepage Send Gray Richardson a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Faiths & Avatars says that Amaunator died of neglect about a millenium after the fall of Netheril. That would be circa 660 DR, give or take. How much to give or take is debateable. An error rate of half a century would put it roughly 600-700 DR.

Jergal had the dusk portfolio and he gave it to Myrkul. He may have done so out of a fear of dying. Or out of a sense of duty to his other portfolios. He might have figured he needed to break out of the cycle so that he could live on and shepherd the universe tidily along the path toward the end of all things.

Whatever Jergal's reasons for doing so, Myrkul was tricked in a way. Myrkul took over the portfolio of dusk long enough to earn the death that was fated for Jergal.

But the transition of the dusk portfolio from Jergal to Myrkul does not represent a "setting" and "rising" of the dusk aspect, it should be seen as a continuous chain. Myrkul was just taking over the tail end of this particular stage in the cycle.

Now, Lathander being worshipped in 3rd century Athalantar, before Amaunator died, could have a number of explanations.

1) Lathander was the alias of Amaunator at that time, and the Lathander they were worshipping was Amaunator up until his death at which time the Lathander they worshipped was the newborn Lathander.

2) Lathander may have been the sun god of the Talfiric pantheon of the Western Heartlands, and since the Faerūnian pantheon was not unified at that time, his existence did not overlap Amaunator's as they had different spheres of influence and thus could have similar portfolios. Perhaps the unification of the Talfiric and Netherese pantheons together into the greater Faerūnian pantheon was what put the nail in the coffin of Amaunator.

3) Eric L. Boyd's idea that godly events happen outside of time and have no exact correlation to mortal time could mean that Amaunator had died with respect to Athalantar, and that Lathander had risen there, while Amaunator had not yet "set" and Lathander had yet to "rise" in other parts of Faerūn.

You know there is already a metaphorical precedent for different geographic areas to see the sun differently depending on location, and that is the phenomenon of time zones. For instance England is 6 hours ahead of where I am in Texas, so it can be noon here at the same time it is dusk over there.

While I am not proposing a direct mapping of time zones to the Lathander/Amaunator question, it works as a metaphor. It can still be true that Amaunator had to die before Lathander could arise, but the moment of that transition could be different(perhaps by as much as centuries apart) for different populations of people depending on their perspective on the sun.

Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000