Author |
Topic  |
Sightless
Senior Scribe
  
USA
608 Posts |
Posted - 26 Sep 2012 : 01:36:27
|
You know Karl Windaten said the same thing about viruses , those things that require a host to survive and reproduce, back in 1879. The same way that sexual species require male and female to reproduce. Viruses still communicate, just on a chemical level, they use tools, hormones and protein systems to invade cells and conquer them. They engage in adaptive morphology, which while slow at it, are capable of doing it far quicker than of the “higher order organisms” are. And from an evolutionary stand point, purely on the basis of sexual reproduction, they have been far more successful, as every organism can die to a virus, everyone. And bacterial organisms. The strongest elephant, the biggest wail, and even human beings.
Now, let’s show this from another way, you say higher order organisms are better, first of all least take at reproduction, Viruses require a host, which is worse you say, sexual reproduction requires to organisms, both being morphologically different, but of the same species; bodily fluids along with basic elements of genetic ingredients must pass from one organism to the other, in a set manner, at a specific time, which opens both organisms to be killed during the process. While the one organism carries the embryo to term, in most cases the female, but in some cases male, that being undergoes massive biochemical differences, which limits there survival rate. This is not so with asexually reproducing species, bacteria, viruses, single celled organisms. Now, you say, if the other races were to go the mind flayers, would die. This excludes the inability of them to simply find another source of organisms to host. The other organisms, those that can in sexual reproduction are as much at the mercy of their environment as those that engage in asexual reproduction, they require set environmental conditions to provide them with regular food sources. They require group protection, during the survival declines that later stages of pregnancy require, etc, etc.
Now, let us at last look at the sheer form of the concepts of asexual reproduction that we have on the one hand, and sexual reproduction on the other and thank about them in a purely logical stand point, stripping away the natural desire to see those organisms closer to ourselves as higher, and those more alien as different, and see how they are equivalent.
Sexual reproduction 1[Asx anversan Qr] Given statement 2[If Asx then (sU or Qr)] 1, DeMorgons. 3[-(sU or Qr)] 2, negation of 2 through the converse of a primace. 4[Asx] 1, reintroduced with out supplement as a consequence of 3.
Asexual reproduction 1[Asx anversan Sq] given statement 2[IfAsx then (Sq or Sn)] 3[ sub proof introduction [-Sq or Sn) negation introduction or alimination, 2. 4 [-Sq or Sn) if and only if Asx contingent premise, 1. 5Return to main proof, [ Asx suppercedes supersceeds (Sq or Sn) 4R. 6[Asx suppercedes ] conclusion reached by 5.
Note, this last line isn’t actually necessary on the second logical argument, but hopefully by it’s inclusion you can see that both arguments, sexual and asexual are logically equivalent. Neither is better or wors than the other. The problem as we often like to assign qualitative labels to quantative differences. There are a few cases where this logically correct, but most of the time it’s not.
|
We choose to live a lie, when we see with, & not through the eye.
Every decision, no matter the evidence, is a leap of faith; if it were not, then it wouldn't be a choice at all. |
 |
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
    
Australia
31799 Posts |
Posted - 26 Sep 2012 : 01:52:44
|
quote: Originally posted by Wooly Rupert
quote: Originally posted by Alystra Illianniis
The ones in drow cities are usually there for trade- be it of slaves, magic, or other goods. They are not ALLIES, but they are considered "useful" by the drow, at times.
BTW, I was not refering to asexual reproduction, but to the fact that they cannot reproduce AT ALL without a host body for the "tadpole" to mature in. Only parasites require another living creature in which to grow their offspring. And it's not falacy that higher orders of animals are superior, from an evolutionary view. higher creatures are often more adaptable, as they are able to alter behavior to fit the environment, many can and do use tools or live in complex social groups, and yes, communication. A species able to do these things is more likely to survive changes to the environment.
I have a hard time believing that illithids would survive in the Underdark at all if not for the presence of the humanoid races like drow, duergars, and deep gnomes, heck, even orcs and goblins. Without those otehr races available to use for reproduction and food (I can only think of a very few actuall creatures that do this, and they are all parasitic insects), illithids would die out completely. That's a HUGE survival drawback in a place as dangerous as the Underdark. I'd even call them an evolutionary dead-end, since if the races they depend on were to leave the Underdark, they would not only starve, but be utterly unable to reproduce. That makes no sense to me, either from a design standpoint, or biological one. Too reliant on outside factors for survival. I prefer the original version where they simply matured over time in the ppol, and emerged after ten years as fuuly developed. It's more biologically sound.
Actually, without humanoid races to use for ceremorphosis, we wouldn't have mind flayers -- but there would be other illithid races. Mind flayers are simply the most common form.
Of course, there's also the *theory* [I think, from 3e's Fiend Folio] that suggests illithids are actually born from exposing humanoids to the "pseudonatural" environment of the Far Realm. But Wizards hasn't really followed up on that stuff, so I'm assuming what we learned from Wakeman in The Illithiad is still largely valid. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)
"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood
Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage |
 |
|
Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief

    
USA
36878 Posts |
Posted - 26 Sep 2012 : 04:28:24
|
quote: Originally posted by Alystra Illianniis
Don't they all reproduce the same way? I'm aware of the "bestial" forms, but they are just illithids that ended up in animals or other unintelligent creatures, IIRC. The point is it's not very realistic that mind flayers, or any of the others could exist. Somehow that just doesn't seem very "superior" to me, as it's entirely too dependant on using other creatures as both food osurce AND incubator. YMMV. As I said, it seems way too inspired by the Aleins movies.
What I'm saying is that an illithid tadpole, left alone long enough, will become something else, regardless of whether or not there is a host. A tadpole without a host could become a neolithid, and those are some scary buggers.
And that's entirely non-parasitic.
The classic, kinda humanish mind flayer is simply the preferred form.
And even in the real world, there are creatures -- mostly insects -- that implant their larva in other animals and let those larva grow and eat their way out of the host. Food source and incubator.
And mammals aren't all that different, either. Mammalian reproduction requires the mother to act as the incubator, and to provide the food. So why is this such a bad concept? |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!  |
 |
|
Markustay
Realms Explorer extraordinaire
    
USA
15724 Posts |
Posted - 26 Sep 2012 : 05:12:06
|
I depend on cows to live. I eat one whole cow every day (well... not really... I just look like it).
Does that make cows my superior?
We eat animals, keep them as pets, put them in zoos and habitats, protect them and hunt them, and even bet on them. This is how an illithid views just about everyone else.
And our babies drink milk... from cows. We don't need the cows milk, but it our preference to use it. Otherwise our babies might grow up to be Neothilids.  |
"I have never in my life learned anything from any man who agreed with me" --- Dudley Field Malone
|
 |
|
TBeholder
Great Reader
    
2477 Posts |
Posted - 26 Sep 2012 : 09:14:37
|
quote: Originally posted by Alystra Illianniis
Makes more sens to me than turning another entire creature into one of them. If they are made from body-snatching, then one would think that there would be many different forms depending on the "donor" body, but that doesn't seem to be the case.
There are, but the set of viable hosts is rather limited - most demihumans/humanoids, but no dwarves/gnomes/giants/etc. And since anatomical differences between e.g. elf, human and orc is less than differences between either and an illithid, how different these forms can be? For different ceremorph forms there are ropers - resulting is an urophion, and lizardmen - resulting in a tzakandi, which returns us to Realmslore (it's practiced in Oryndoll, but they are kept in the city).
quote: Originally posted by Alystra Illianniis
I have a hard time believing that illithids would survive in the Underdark at all if not for the presence of the humanoid races like drow, duergars, and deep gnomes, heck, even orcs and goblins. Without those otehr races available to use for reproduction and food (I can only think of a very few actuall creatures that do this, and they are all parasitic insects), illithids would die out completely.
Same as with the previous problem: the necessity of a stage when they slowly eat out a creature's brain, grow into the rest of its body and transform does not differ in this regard from simply relying on the same creatures as food... And they have that, too, even if requirements for edible brains are not so narrow. As to less than guaranteed access to the species on which their life cycle depends so much, the answer is very simple: illithids aren't hunters-gatherers. They can - and do - keep and breed their own cattle. Which is how all gith races came to be, for one. |
People never wonder How the world goes round -Helloween And even I make no pretense Of having more than common sense -R.W.Wood It's not good, Eric. It's a gazebo. -Ed Whitchurch |
 |
|
Kris the Grey
Senior Scribe
  
USA
422 Posts |
Posted - 27 Sep 2012 : 17:17:47
|
I suspect that somewhere in the 2E timeframe a decision was made that since the two big baddies of 'space' (aka Spelljammer), Illithids and Neogi, were effectively 'aliens' that they should be designed in truly alien ways. I suppose, this also being a timeframe in which the xenomorphs from the Aliens (and Predator) series of films were quite popular, it seemed logical to require both of those races to recruit humanoids as food and reproduction fodder (in a twist on the classic 50's 'Mars Needs Women' sort of way).
I don't have a problem with Illithids needing humanoids for reproduction into forms that they use to most commonly interact with humanoids. It sort of makes sense in a way (the way the MiGo in Delta Green use the 'Greys' to communicate with and manipulate humans to avoid really freaking us out by revealing their truly alien forms). It also reinforces the truly exotic and incomprehensible nature of their race and makes them more frightening opponents. Being captured by Drow is bad, being captured (or sold to) Illithids is much, much, worse. As a DM, I enjoy having that tool in my toolbox. |
Kris the Grey - Member in Good Standing of the Watchful Order of Magists and Protectors, the Arcane Guild of Silverymoon, and the Connecticut Bar Association |
 |
|
Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief

    
USA
36878 Posts |
Posted - 27 Sep 2012 : 17:30:17
|
quote: Originally posted by Kris the Grey
I suspect that somewhere in the 2E timeframe a decision was made that since the two big baddies of 'space' (aka Spelljammer), Illithids and Neogi, were effectively 'aliens' that they should be designed in truly alien ways. I suppose, this also being a timeframe in which the xenomorphs from the Aliens (and Predator) series of films were quite popular, it seemed logical to require both of those races to recruit humanoids as food and reproduction fodder (in a twist on the classic 50's 'Mars Needs Women' sort of way).
Illithids predate Spelljammer. I'm pretty sure they predate 2E, in fact.
I think it's safe to assume illithids were inspired by Cthulhu. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!  |
 |
|
Kris the Grey
Senior Scribe
  
USA
422 Posts |
Posted - 27 Sep 2012 : 17:33:44
|
Well certainly, Gary loved him his Illithid, so they appear VERY early in D&D (maybe even before the Monster Manual methinks). I was merely pointing out that all of this 'they use your bodies to reproduce' stuff came from the Spelljammer timeframe (for reasons I suspect). |
Kris the Grey - Member in Good Standing of the Watchful Order of Magists and Protectors, the Arcane Guild of Silverymoon, and the Connecticut Bar Association |
 |
|
Kris the Grey
Senior Scribe
  
USA
422 Posts |
Posted - 27 Sep 2012 : 17:39:18
|
And, if wikipedia is to be believed, we appear to both be onto something! To whit:
Publication history:
Mind flayers were created by Gary Gygax, who has said that one of his inspirations for them was the cover painting of the book The Burrowers Beneath by Brian Lumley,[2] a story grounded in the Cthulhu Mythos created by H.P. Lovecraft.[3]
Dungeons & Dragons (1974-1976)
Mind flayers first appeared in the official newsletter of TSR Games, The Strategic Review #1, Spring 1975. Here, the mind flayer is described as "a super-intelligent, man-shaped creature with four tentacles by its mouth which it uses to strike its prey." When it hits prey with a tentacle, the tentacle penetrates to the brain and draws it forth, allowing the monster to devour it. A mind flayer's major weapon is given as the Mind Blast, a 5-foot radius wave of "PSI force" which affects each opponent differently based on how intelligent it is; possible effects include permanent insanity, rage, confusion, coma, and death.[4] They were also included in the Eldritch Wizardry supplement,[5][6] for the original (white box) Dungeons and Dragons game (1976), wherein they are described as super-intelligent, man-shaped creatures of great (and lawful) evil, with tentacles that penetrate to the brain and draw it forth for food.
Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition (1977-1988)
The mind flayer appears in the first edition Monster Manual (1977).[7] Roger E. Moore authored "The Ecology of the Mind Flayer," which featured in Dragon #78 (October 1983). The article "The Sunset World" by Stephen Inniss in Dragon #150 (October 1989) presented a world that had been completely ravaged by mind flayers. The "Dragon's Bestiary" column, in the same issue and by the same author, described the Illithidae, the strange inhabitants of this world.
Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition (1989-1999)
The mind flayer appears first in the Monstrous Compendium Volume One (1989),[9] and is reprinted in the Monstrous Manual (1993).[10] The ulitharid, or "noble illithid" was introduced in the Dungeon adventure Thunder Under Needlespire by James Jacobs in Dungeon #24 (July/August 1990), and later included in the Monstrous Compendium Annual One (1994).
The The Complete Psionics Handbook (1991) presented ways on using mind flayers with psionic powers.[11]
The Alhoon, also known as the illithilich or mind flayer lich, was introduced in the Menzoberranzan boxed set, in the booklet "Book One: The City" (1992).
The book "The Illithiad" (1998),[12] and the Monstrous Arcana module series that accompanies it, greatly develops the mind flayer further. "The Illithiad" introduced the illithid elder brain and the illithid-roper crossbreed, the urophion. The module Dawn of the Overmind featured an origin story for the illithids.[13] |
Kris the Grey - Member in Good Standing of the Watchful Order of Magists and Protectors, the Arcane Guild of Silverymoon, and the Connecticut Bar Association |
 |
|
Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief

    
USA
36878 Posts |
Posted - 27 Sep 2012 : 17:42:33
|
Pretty sure elder brains were around before The Illithiad. And I think Ed developed the alhoon. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!  |
 |
|
Kris the Grey
Senior Scribe
  
USA
422 Posts |
Posted - 27 Sep 2012 : 17:52:57
|
I just cracked open my Dragon #78 (from 1983) and read the Roger E. Moore 'Ecology of' article. No mention of Illithid reproduction whatsoever. So yeah, that seems to have sprung from the 2E timeframe.
There is a definite focus on CoC style origins for the Mind Flayers though. They are described as coming from a 'dark world outside the known worlds' and conquering worlds they discover through their mental explorations by: 1) sending a scout to shift himself partially into the new world to poke around and 2) following that on with a larger force of Mind Flayers arriving fully physically via travel across the astral plane (I'm foggy on this one, but it's Roger E. Moore! Lol). |
Kris the Grey - Member in Good Standing of the Watchful Order of Magists and Protectors, the Arcane Guild of Silverymoon, and the Connecticut Bar Association |
 |
|
Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief

    
USA
36878 Posts |
Posted - 27 Sep 2012 : 18:07:11
|
Dragon 185, from September 1992, details the alhoon.
Can't find earlier references to the elder brain, at least not online -- but I do recall one being mentioned in the Dark Elf trilogy, and I'm rather certain that predates The Illithiad. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!  |
 |
|
Kris the Grey
Senior Scribe
  
USA
422 Posts |
Posted - 27 Sep 2012 : 18:17:00
|
Yeah, the Menzo boxed set has the same 1992 publication date. Ed was the Alhoon master.
Illithiad was 1998, the Dark Elf Trilogy 1990-1991. So, yep there is an Elder Brain reference pre-dating the Illithiad. That said, they don't go into Mind Flayer reproduction specifics until 1998. The Elder Brain in the book is just the big baddy Mind Flayer if memory serves. |
Kris the Grey - Member in Good Standing of the Watchful Order of Magists and Protectors, the Arcane Guild of Silverymoon, and the Connecticut Bar Association |
 |
|
Lord Bane
Senior Scribe
  
Germany
479 Posts |
Posted - 27 Sep 2012 : 21:44:05
|
Lords of Madness gives the "menace from the future" referance so the "Squids" are timetravelers. Given that and putting into account the Spelljammer chronology maybe they are created by that mysterious race that everyone else has built on in the crystal spheres as they vanished and the ilithids are supposed to have destoryed their creators? |
The driving force in the multiverse is evil, for it forces good to act. |
 |
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
    
Australia
31799 Posts |
Posted - 28 Sep 2012 : 02:35:35
|
quote: Originally posted by Wooly Rupert
quote: Originally posted by Kris the Grey
I suspect that somewhere in the 2E timeframe a decision was made that since the two big baddies of 'space' (aka Spelljammer), Illithids and Neogi, were effectively 'aliens' that they should be designed in truly alien ways. I suppose, this also being a timeframe in which the xenomorphs from the Aliens (and Predator) series of films were quite popular, it seemed logical to require both of those races to recruit humanoids as food and reproduction fodder (in a twist on the classic 50's 'Mars Needs Women' sort of way).
Illithids predate Spelljammer. I'm pretty sure they predate 2E, in fact.
Illithids date to around 1975, as I recall, with the first issue of The Strategic Review.
quote: I think it's safe to assume illithids were inspired by Cthulhu.
I recall Gygax once noting that part of the inspiration for his creation of the illithids, was an illustration on the cover of a book written by Brian Lumley -- a noted Lovecraftian horror-writer. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)
"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood
Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage |
 |
|
Sightless
Senior Scribe
  
USA
608 Posts |
Posted - 28 Sep 2012 : 02:59:17
|
Indeed, originally their abilities were primiraly suited towards psychosis. Not the psyonic of later versions. |
We choose to live a lie, when we see with, & not through the eye.
Every decision, no matter the evidence, is a leap of faith; if it were not, then it wouldn't be a choice at all. |
 |
|
Alystra Illianniis
Great Reader
    
USA
3750 Posts |
Posted - 29 Sep 2012 : 02:15:39
|
quote: Originally posted by Sightless
You know Karl Windaten said the same thing about viruses , those things that require a host to survive and reproduce, back in 1879. The same way that sexual species require male and female to reproduce. Viruses still communicate, just on a chemical level, they use tools, hormones and protein systems to invade cells and conquer them. They engage in adaptive morphology, which while slow at it, are capable of doing it far quicker than of the “higher order organisms” are. And from an evolutionary stand point, purely on the basis of sexual reproduction, they have been far more successful, as every organism can die to a virus, everyone. And bacterial organisms. The strongest elephant, the biggest wail, and even human beings.
Now, let’s show this from another way, you say higher order organisms are better, first of all least take at reproduction, Viruses require a host, which is worse you say, sexual reproduction requires to organisms, both being morphologically different, but of the same species; bodily fluids along with basic elements of genetic ingredients must pass from one organism to the other, in a set manner, at a specific time, which opens both organisms to be killed during the process. While the one organism carries the embryo to term, in most cases the female, but in some cases male, that being undergoes massive biochemical differences, which limits there survival rate. This is not so with asexually reproducing species, bacteria, viruses, single celled organisms. Now, you say, if the other races were to go the mind flayers, would die. This excludes the inability of them to simply find another source of organisms to host. The other organisms, those that can in sexual reproduction are as much at the mercy of their environment as those that engage in asexual reproduction, they require set environmental conditions to provide them with regular food sources. They require group protection, during the survival declines that later stages of pregnancy require, etc, etc.
Now, let us at last look at the sheer form of the concepts of asexual reproduction that we have on the one hand, and sexual reproduction on the other and thank about them in a purely logical stand point, stripping away the natural desire to see those organisms closer to ourselves as higher, and those more alien as different, and see how they are equivalent.
Sexual reproduction 1[Asx anversan Qr] Given statement 2[If Asx then (sU or Qr)] 1, DeMorgons. 3[-(sU or Qr)] 2, negation of 2 through the converse of a primace. 4[Asx] 1, reintroduced with out supplement as a consequence of 3.
Asexual reproduction 1[Asx anversan Sq] given statement 2[IfAsx then (Sq or Sn)] 3[ sub proof introduction [-Sq or Sn) negation introduction or alimination, 2. 4 [-Sq or Sn) if and only if Asx contingent premise, 1. 5Return to main proof, [ Asx suppercedes supersceeds (Sq or Sn) 4R. 6[Asx suppercedes ] conclusion reached by 5.
Note, this last line isn’t actually necessary on the second logical argument, but hopefully by it’s inclusion you can see that both arguments, sexual and asexual are logically equivalent. Neither is better or wors than the other. The problem as we often like to assign qualitative labels to quantative differences. There are a few cases where this logically correct, but most of the time it’s not.
?!?!?! That whole last part made no sense at all, I'm afraid. In any case, you seem to have missed the point- it's not the ASEXUAL aspect that I feel is less biologically sound- it's the reliance on ANOTHER SPECIES for reproductive requirements. Take the other species out of the equasion, and suddenly, there is no longer eve na possibility of continuing the species which depends so completely on the (now) missing element.
What it comes down to (biologically- and I already covered the insect parasites) is whether a species can stand on its own reproductively. Illithids and all their other xenoforms simply can't I don't call that a viable biology. It's a dead-end. And those tadpoles left alone might still continue to grow, but (as I recall) they still must eventually find a host or die. They simply don't become intelligent if they only find animals or other lower Underdark creatures to act as hosts.
I do find it interesting that the Illithids as a group were inspired both by Lovecraftian mythos, and by (presumably) the Xenomorphs. While I like the concept (on the surface) the changes made to their life-cycle seem ill-thought-out, or basically introduced for "kewl" factor. I always pictured them (from the old MM entry which was my introduction to most D&D monsters) as like amphibians, with a sort of frog-like metamorphosis from tadpole to adult. It makes far more sense both in terms of a species, and as a means of using the limited resources of the Underdark. Even breeding their own "cattle", they would have a very small survival rate to adulthood, as some slave-food races would be unsuitable for ceromorphosis, others would simply not survive the process due to disease, weakness, or what-have-you, and then considering that they must also use those same beings for food (And they only eat the brain- the SAME part which the tadpole must devour!) limits the number available to use for the process. Their species would be very quickly wiped out by their own food scources in counter-attacks or preemptive strikes, as a major threat in the Underdark, and they would not be able to replenish them fast enough to keep up with the death rate. Does not work as a species to me..... |
The Goddess is alive, and magic is afoot.
"Where Science ends, Magic begins" -Spiral, Uncanny X-Men #491
"You idiots! You've captured their STUNT doubles!" -Spaceballs
Lothir's character background/stats: http://forum.candlekeep.com/pop_profile.asp?mode=display&id=5469
My stories: http://z3.invisionfree.com/Mickeys_Comic_Tavern/index.php?showforum=188
Lothir, courtesy of Sylinde (Deviant Art)/Luaxena (Chosen of Eilistraee) http://sylinde.deviantart.com/#/d2z6e4u |
 |
|
Fellfire
Master of Realmslore
   
1965 Posts |
Posted - 29 Sep 2012 : 03:13:29
|
I think, based on their psionic abilities, particularly psychometabolism that if faced with extinction because of a limited food/host source they would be able to adapt (radically) to nearly any foreseeable genetic complication. Especially when considering their (diminished)multi-planar holdings, their Spelljamming technology, and possibly even limited time-travel. There are always more thralls. |
Misanthorpe
Love is a lie. Only hate endures. Light is blinding. Only in darkness do we see clearly.
"Oh, you think darkness is your ally? You merely adopted the dark. I was born in it, molded by it. I didn't see the light until I was already a man, by then it was nothing to me but.. blinding. The shadows betray you because they belong to me." - Bane The Dark Knight Rises
Green Dragonscale Dice Bag by Crystalsidyll - check it out
|
Edited by - Fellfire on 29 Sep 2012 03:20:54 |
 |
|
Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief

    
USA
36878 Posts |
Posted - 29 Sep 2012 : 05:17:48
|
quote: Originally posted by Alystra Illianniis
?!?!?! That whole last part made no sense at all, I'm afraid. In any case, you seem to have missed the point- it's not the ASEXUAL aspect that I feel is less biologically sound- it's the reliance on ANOTHER SPECIES for reproductive requirements. Take the other species out of the equasion, and suddenly, there is no longer eve na possibility of continuing the species which depends so completely on the (now) missing element.
What it comes down to (biologically- and I already covered the insect parasites) is whether a species can stand on its own reproductively. Illithids and all their other xenoforms simply can't I don't call that a viable biology. It's a dead-end. And those tadpoles left alone might still continue to grow, but (as I recall) they still must eventually find a host or die. They simply don't become intelligent if they only find animals or other lower Underdark creatures to act as hosts.
I've already pointed out that an illithid tadpole that lives long enough, and that does not get a host, becomes a neolithid, and those are some freaking scary critters.
So the species can exist and reproduce without a host -- it's just that their preferred form and preferred mode of reproduction do involve hosts. They can do without them, but they prefer not to. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!  |
 |
|
Markustay
Realms Explorer extraordinaire
    
USA
15724 Posts |
Posted - 29 Sep 2012 : 20:08:24
|
I wonder if Al Hoon is related to Al Gore. Maybe he's a sub=species.
He did create the internet, and that is a form of mind-control.  |
"I have never in my life learned anything from any man who agreed with me" --- Dudley Field Malone
|
 |
|
Chosen of Asmodeus
Master of Realmslore
   
1221 Posts |
Posted - 29 Sep 2012 : 20:51:13
|
I'm going off memory here, and from second hand sources at that, but I seem to recall that back in the day, Planescape hinted fairly heavily that illithids were, in fact, from the future having traveled back in time to escape the heat death of the universe or some such, and there was the strong implication that illithids were, in fact, the descendants of humanity.
Working under that assumption one might reach the conclusion that the illithid life cycle is not the product of natural selection but rather genetic manipulation over the course of centuries; that it was designed. With that in mind, the supposed flaw that AI is pointing to- the reliance on other races to reach the mature state- becomes a moot point. The flaw only becomes a flaw in the absence of humanoid races- even then, an illithid will evolve into an intelligent, dangerous creature- but the process was designed with the assumption that humanoid races would always be in ample supply, which they almost always are. Drow, orcs, and other underdark races are always fresh for the picking for the illithids, and their colonies generally keep more than enough slaves to provide hosts for their young. Humanoid forms hold certain advantages; bipedal motion, opposable thumbs.
At any rate, there is no life form that we know of that doesn't rely on another life form in some way or another. Mostly it's for food. The fact that the illithids rely on other races for reproduction(which they don't) isn't a particular weakness. Parallels could be drawn between the illithids and the gou'ld and wraith of the Stargate universe- evolved parasites. |
"Then I saw there was a way to Hell even from the gates of Heaven" - John Bunyan, Pilgrim's Progress
Fatum Iustum Stultorum. Righteous is the destiny of fools.
The Roleplayer's Gazebo; http://theroleplayersgazebo.yuku.com/directory#.Ub4hvvlJOAY |
 |
|
Alystra Illianniis
Great Reader
    
USA
3750 Posts |
Posted - 30 Sep 2012 : 00:17:28
|
@ Wooly- according to the Illithiad, neolithids still have to feed off of some form of (non-intelligent) brains in order to survive, and they are created only if the elder brain dies and they are left alone due to the Illithid community's collapse. They apparently grow and turn into a monsterous slug-like creature, and these also gain sentience if they devour a sentient being's brain during that time. So though they may not bond with another creature, they must still go through a form of the same metomorphosis as others. However, one could argue that by that point, they are no longer even the same species, having changed so drastically from the illithid "norm". They would appear to be a form of mutation, or perhaps the species "true" form- which would make the humanoid illithids the mutants.... |
The Goddess is alive, and magic is afoot.
"Where Science ends, Magic begins" -Spiral, Uncanny X-Men #491
"You idiots! You've captured their STUNT doubles!" -Spaceballs
Lothir's character background/stats: http://forum.candlekeep.com/pop_profile.asp?mode=display&id=5469
My stories: http://z3.invisionfree.com/Mickeys_Comic_Tavern/index.php?showforum=188
Lothir, courtesy of Sylinde (Deviant Art)/Luaxena (Chosen of Eilistraee) http://sylinde.deviantart.com/#/d2z6e4u |
 |
|
Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief

    
USA
36878 Posts |
Posted - 30 Sep 2012 : 21:02:17
|
quote: Originally posted by Alystra Illianniis
@ Wooly- according to the Illithiad, neolithids still have to feed off of some form of (non-intelligent) brains in order to survive, and they are created only if the elder brain dies and they are left alone due to the Illithid community's collapse. They apparently grow and turn into a monsterous slug-like creature, and these also gain sentience if they devour a sentient being's brain during that time. So though they may not bond with another creature, they must still go through a form of the same metomorphosis as others. However, one could argue that by that point, they are no longer even the same species, having changed so drastically from the illithid "norm". They would appear to be a form of mutation, or perhaps the species "true" form- which would make the humanoid illithids the mutants....
I don't see the point. All animals need to eat, and some of them have highly specialized diets. And just because they don't end the same, it doesn't mean that they're a separate species -- that neolithid came from the exact same source as a regular illithid.
My point remains: it is not absolutely necessary for illithid tadpoles to have a host, so saying they're less of a race because of this need is simply not correct. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!  |
 |
|
Alystra Illianniis
Great Reader
    
USA
3750 Posts |
Posted - 02 Oct 2012 : 19:38:40
|
My take on it is that they are, if anything, an ENGINEERED race. Not one occuring naturally, from all appearances. Evolution-wise, one species CANNOT spring whole-cloth from combining a juvenile with a host from another species to convert it into its own type. At least not on THIS planet. Where would those first illithids have come from? One species cannot (naturally) be converted into another. That would require some level of bio-engineering and that does not happen naturally. I guess it's just the nature-loving scientist in me, but the illithids as a seperate species just are not plausible to me with that kind of reproductive format. There are certain rules of genetics that are absolute unless tinkered with by an outside source, and this is one of them. One species cannot simply implant its offspring into a completely different species, in order to grow another of its own kind. YEs, I'm aware of viruses, but they do not "convert" other cells into more viruses, they simply force the cells to make them by hijacking the DNA and inserting the codes. With illithids, what we're talking about is taking an already fully-formed creature, and devouring another from the inside out (at the seat of all bodily function, I might add, which SHOULD technically KILL it), while at the same time transforming it into something else. NOT possible in any known species.
I guess what I'm saying here is that they (the humanoid ones) seem more like a viral infection of an existing species (the host) than a seperate "race" of their own. Something like what the T-virus does to people it infest in the Res Evil series. But none of those infected can reproduce afterward, so far as we know, so this is different even from that, and in that respect, is more like the Xenomorphs. Which, given that "Aliens" inspiration came from Geiger, seems too much like mixing sci-fi with D&D. Again, if the neolithis are the "natural" form, then the others are- what? A bio-engineeered mutation? If so, engineered by whom? D&D does have spells that can graft two creatures together, but that's the only way I can see them being possible. If they had kept it as a strictly amphibian-like metamorphosis from tadpole to adult (without inter-species cross-over) it would have been fine. As it is, the Illithiad has made me loose all belief in their plausibility. *shrugs* To each his own, I guess.... |
The Goddess is alive, and magic is afoot.
"Where Science ends, Magic begins" -Spiral, Uncanny X-Men #491
"You idiots! You've captured their STUNT doubles!" -Spaceballs
Lothir's character background/stats: http://forum.candlekeep.com/pop_profile.asp?mode=display&id=5469
My stories: http://z3.invisionfree.com/Mickeys_Comic_Tavern/index.php?showforum=188
Lothir, courtesy of Sylinde (Deviant Art)/Luaxena (Chosen of Eilistraee) http://sylinde.deviantart.com/#/d2z6e4u |
Edited by - Alystra Illianniis on 02 Oct 2012 19:53:27 |
 |
|
Chosen of Asmodeus
Master of Realmslore
   
1221 Posts |
Posted - 02 Oct 2012 : 23:00:27
|
You're missing the point. They aren't supposed to be plausible, and yet they exist anyway. Lets take a step back and look at their inspiration again; illithids, aboleths, all aberrant creatures are inspired primarily by the works of Lovecraft. The reason Lovecraft's monsters drove people insane when they saw them wasn't that they had psychic powers that reached into your mind and broke it. It was simply the fact that these were creatures that should not, by any natural law, exist. They defied physics, they defied geometry, they defied biology, and they defied logic, and yet here they were, staring you in the face. It was the realization that everything you thought you knew about the laws of the universe was wrong, combined with the realization that the universe was such a cold and uncaring place as to allow something that was itself so inherently wrong to exist in the first place that drove Lovecraft's protagonists insane.
Mindflayers shouldn't make sense as biological creatures, nor should aboleths. That's the point. |
"Then I saw there was a way to Hell even from the gates of Heaven" - John Bunyan, Pilgrim's Progress
Fatum Iustum Stultorum. Righteous is the destiny of fools.
The Roleplayer's Gazebo; http://theroleplayersgazebo.yuku.com/directory#.Ub4hvvlJOAY |
 |
|
Sightless
Senior Scribe
  
USA
608 Posts |
Posted - 02 Oct 2012 : 23:24:56
|
quote: Originally posted by Alystra Illianniis
My take on it is that they are, if anything, an ENGINEERED race. Not one occuring naturally, from all appearances. Evolution-wise, one species CANNOT spring whole-cloth from combining a juvenile with a host from another species to convert it into its own type. At least not on THIS planet. Where would those first illithids have come from? One species cannot (naturally) be converted into another. That would require some level of bio-engineering and that does not happen naturally. I guess it's just the nature-loving scientist in me, but the illithids as a seperate species just are not plausible to me with that kind of reproductive format. There are certain rules of genetics that are absolute unless tinkered with by an outside source, and this is one of them. One species cannot simply implant its offspring into a completely different species, in order to grow another of its own kind. YEs, I'm aware of viruses, but they do not "convert" other cells into more viruses, they simply force the cells to make them by hijacking the DNA and inserting the codes. With illithids, what we're talking about is taking an already fully-formed creature, and devouring another from the inside out (at the seat of all bodily function, I might add, which SHOULD technically KILL it), while at the same time transforming it into something else. NOT possible in any known species.
I guess what I'm saying here is that they (the humanoid ones) seem more like a viral infection of an existing species (the host) than a seperate "race" of their own. Something like what the T-virus does to people it infest in the Res Evil series. But none of those infected can reproduce afterward, so far as we know, so this is different even from that, and in that respect, is more like the Xenomorphs. Which, given that "Aliens" inspiration came from Geiger, seems too much like mixing sci-fi with D&D. Again, if the neolithis are the "natural" form, then the others are- what? A bio-engineeered mutation? If so, engineered by whom? D&D does have spells that can graft two creatures together, but that's the only way I can see them being possible. If they had kept it as a strictly amphibian-like metamorphosis from tadpole to adult (without inter-species cross-over) it would have been fine. As it is, the Illithiad has made me loose all belief in their plausibility. *shrugs* To each his own, I guess....
Let me ask one simple question, do you find Beholders particularly plossible?
|
We choose to live a lie, when we see with, & not through the eye.
Every decision, no matter the evidence, is a leap of faith; if it were not, then it wouldn't be a choice at all. |
 |
|
Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief

    
USA
36878 Posts |
Posted - 03 Oct 2012 : 00:19:01
|
You know, I find myself liking the bio-engineered idea... Maybe neolithids are the true form of the race, and they engineered the mind flayers for some reason. When it became necessary for them to do their temporal jaunt, it was all the mind flayers, and few of anything else. In fact, maybe the mind flayers were fleeing their former masters, and that's why they're so rare now! |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!  |
 |
|
Chosen of Asmodeus
Master of Realmslore
   
1221 Posts |
Posted - 03 Oct 2012 : 00:38:30
|
As for why they'd engineer mindflayers, there are various reasons. The humanoid body shape offers several advantages we take for granted. Bipedal motion is the most energy efficient way to walk, hands and opposable thumbs make fine manipulation considerably easier. Clothing, equipment, structures can all be more easily and efficiently designed to accommodate humanoids than neolithids, what with matters of space conservation(a mindflayer occupies considerably less room than a neolithid).
The 4e Underdark supplement mentions that illithids see themselves as the perfect middle ground "between logic and madness" as opposed to the completely alien aboleths, who they're at war with, so that could have influenced their desire to alter their form, or it could be a biproduct of their altered form. Granted, 4e also works with the notion that illithids, aboleths, and other aberrant creatures are all from the Far Realm as opposed to the "illithids are from the future" theory, though as the Far Realm is a place where the rules of reality are left at the door, it's possible that illithids are from the far realm and the future at the same time, as it isn't supposed to make sense. |
"Then I saw there was a way to Hell even from the gates of Heaven" - John Bunyan, Pilgrim's Progress
Fatum Iustum Stultorum. Righteous is the destiny of fools.
The Roleplayer's Gazebo; http://theroleplayersgazebo.yuku.com/directory#.Ub4hvvlJOAY |
 |
|
Sightless
Senior Scribe
  
USA
608 Posts |
Posted - 03 Oct 2012 : 01:38:11
|
quote: Originally posted by Wooly Rupert
You know, I find myself liking the bio-engineered idea... Maybe neolithids are the true form of the race, and they engineered the mind flayers for some reason. When it became necessary for them to do their temporal jaunt, it was all the mind flayers, and few of anything else. In fact, maybe the mind flayers were fleeing their former masters, and that's why they're so rare now!
In Eberyon? I don't know if I'm spelling that correctly, Mind flayers were created in specialy crystal pods in the plain of madness. those that are currently on the material plain consider themselves lucky, as they don't like it there. Apearently the plain of madness isn't there thing. Note, the bbio-enginered thing only works if you want to use this as the possible explanation for all mind flayers, and keep in mind in this world, they were intended as weapons. Nothing more, nothing less. |
We choose to live a lie, when we see with, & not through the eye.
Every decision, no matter the evidence, is a leap of faith; if it were not, then it wouldn't be a choice at all. |
 |
|
Chosen of Asmodeus
Master of Realmslore
   
1221 Posts |
Posted - 03 Oct 2012 : 01:59:36
|
It's Eberron.
The bio-engineered thing was really something that came up off the top of my head(though I'm sure it's been used somewhere). However, the idea that mindflayers are actually from the future was proposed in previous editions of Planescape and I'm fairly sure was used as the default assumption of their origin in the core setting, and I haven't seen anything that explicitly contradicts it in realmslore, though as I said, 4e in general has largely abandoned that idea. |
"Then I saw there was a way to Hell even from the gates of Heaven" - John Bunyan, Pilgrim's Progress
Fatum Iustum Stultorum. Righteous is the destiny of fools.
The Roleplayer's Gazebo; http://theroleplayersgazebo.yuku.com/directory#.Ub4hvvlJOAY |
Edited by - Chosen of Asmodeus on 03 Oct 2012 02:00:15 |
 |
|
Topic  |
|
|
|