Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 General Forgotten Realms Chat
 Is there a collective term for neutral outsiders?
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

varyar
Learned Scribe

133 Posts

Posted - 01 Mar 2012 :  19:55:46  Show Profile  Visit varyar's Homepage Send varyar a Private Message  Reply with Quote  Delete Topic
Archons, guardinals, (pre-4E) eladrin and so on are celestials, demons, devils, yugoloths and the rest are fiends... but what do you call modrons, inevitables, rilmani and other neutral outsiders? Is there a canon term for them?

Out Now on the DMs Guild:

Leira the Mistshadow: https://www.dmsguild.com/product/493852/Leira-the-Mistshadow

Vandria Gilmadrith, Lady of Grief: https://www.dmsguild.com/product/481871/Vandria-Gilmadrith-Lady-of-Grief

Ayrik
Great Reader

Canada
7989 Posts

Posted - 02 Mar 2012 :  00:57:38  Show Profile Send Ayrik a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Modrons are just modrons, they require no other title. Their intrinsic focus on order, hierarchy, structure, and law is absolute and makes no real distinctions between non-lawful (alien) concepts like good and evil. I'd expect they cannot easily distinguish between LG justice and LE tyranny, and would have little preference anyhow unless the law imposed by these systems was measured differently.

I think it would be incorrect to apply a label to "Chaotics", since the very nature of chaos defies any constant or uniform categorization.

There are also Outlanders, natives from the Outlands. Although I'm not sure if this is a general term or just used by one particular group in Sigil to refer to another particular group in Sigil ... or if it even applies to "neutral" inhabitants of other planes at all.

Of course, natives of the Realms (and other worlds) refer to "Outsiders", while planars refer to "(clueless) Primes".

[/Ayrik]

Edited by - Ayrik on 02 Mar 2012 01:00:55
Go to Top of Page

Gray Richardson
Master of Realmslore

USA
1291 Posts

Posted - 10 Mar 2012 :  02:33:39  Show Profile  Visit Gray Richardson's Homepage Send Gray Richardson a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Exemplar is a general term used for the dominant race of each aligned plane of the Great Wheel. The exemplars are the archetypes of their respective alignments.

This term would include modrons, rilmani and slaad as well as archons, devils and demons. Although, inevitables would probably not be considered exemplars, nor would quesars or formians; though powerful in their own right, those races do not "exemplify" their alignments.

The term "exemplar" may have less relevance to the Realms cosmology which is not centered around alignment, although no reason the term cannot still apply.

I have heard some people use the dubious term "concordants" to refer to neutral outsiders. Although this might more properly be restricted to true neutral outsiders, whereas lawful outsiders might better be called "axiomatics" and chaotic outsiders "anarchics".

While celestials of all alignments can identify with their shared goodness, and fiends of all alignments can identify with their shared evil, there is nothing to unite neutral outsiders in their shared neutrality. Neutrality is, afterall, a lack of commitment to an ideal. Slaadi and modrons are as fundamentally opposed to each other as guardinals and yugoloths. Don't forget that their alignments are often called true or pure lawful and true or pure chaotic. Slaadi and modrons are devoted to pure, if not extreme expression of their one true alignment. And the rilmani are just as purely devoted to their centrism. They see alignment of any kind as a corruption. No love there for the modrons or slaadi. In fact, the rilmani are equidistant from all alignments -- and feel no shared purpose or identity with any of them.

All of this is to say that the neutral outsiders are less of a "team" than any other row or column of the big tic-tac-toe board that is the D&D alignment system. I suppose, then, that the term "neutral outsiders" is as appropriate a kenning as any to refer to those guys.
Go to Top of Page

Lord Karsus
Great Reader

USA
3740 Posts

Posted - 10 Mar 2012 :  03:57:38  Show Profile Send Lord Karsus a Private Message  Reply with Quote
"What makes a good man go neutral? Lust for gold? Power? Or were you just born with a heart full of neutrality? I hate these filthy neutrals Kif! With enemies you know where they stand but with neutrals? Who knows! It sickens me."

(A Tri-Partite Arcanist Who Has Forgotten More Than Most Will Ever Know)

Elves of Faerūn
Vol I- The Elves of Faerūn
Vol. III- Spells of the Elves
Vol. VI- Mechanical Compendium
Go to Top of Page

Markustay
Realms Explorer extraordinaire

USA
15724 Posts

Posted - 10 Mar 2012 :  04:22:14  Show Profile Send Markustay a Private Message  Reply with Quote
"Dirty Boy!"


"I have never in my life learned anything from any man who agreed with me" --- Dudley Field Malone

Go to Top of Page

TBeholder
Great Reader

2427 Posts

Posted - 10 Mar 2012 :  06:56:11  Show Profile Send TBeholder a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Why would anyone need such a term?
For completeness? But this strongly affects only Guvners and similar orderly types, and they won't want to pile Slaad and Modrons (or chaos imps with formians) together anyway.

People never wonder How the world goes round -Helloween
And even I make no pretense Of having more than common sense -R.W.Wood
It's not good, Eric. It's a gazebo. -Ed Whitchurch
Go to Top of Page

varyar
Learned Scribe

133 Posts

Posted - 10 Mar 2012 :  13:32:35  Show Profile  Visit varyar's Homepage Send varyar a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by TBeholder

Why would anyone need such a term?
For completeness? But this strongly affects only Guvners and similar orderly types, and they won't want to pile Slaad and Modrons (or chaos imps with formians) together anyway.



Completeness and conciseness, really. Those dirty beige neutrals are no less deserving of a category name! I'm leaning towards 'balancers' for them now,

Out Now on the DMs Guild:

Leira the Mistshadow: https://www.dmsguild.com/product/493852/Leira-the-Mistshadow

Vandria Gilmadrith, Lady of Grief: https://www.dmsguild.com/product/481871/Vandria-Gilmadrith-Lady-of-Grief
Go to Top of Page

Markustay
Realms Explorer extraordinaire

USA
15724 Posts

Posted - 10 Mar 2012 :  16:38:32  Show Profile Send Markustay a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I usually just call them "fence-sitters".

"Lazy Gits" is another I like.

"I have never in my life learned anything from any man who agreed with me" --- Dudley Field Malone

Go to Top of Page

varyar
Learned Scribe

133 Posts

Posted - 10 Mar 2012 :  19:59:03  Show Profile  Visit varyar's Homepage Send varyar a Private Message  Reply with Quote
We should be nicer to dedicated neutrals. They are DEEPLY committed to not taking a stand!

Out Now on the DMs Guild:

Leira the Mistshadow: https://www.dmsguild.com/product/493852/Leira-the-Mistshadow

Vandria Gilmadrith, Lady of Grief: https://www.dmsguild.com/product/481871/Vandria-Gilmadrith-Lady-of-Grief
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000