Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Realmslore
 Sages of Realmslore
 The fate of Nimbral
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

ElfBane
Learned Scribe

USA
294 Posts

Posted - 28 May 2010 :  15:15:54  Show Profile Send ElfBane a Private Message  Reply with Quote  Delete Topic
The most recent FRCG says that Nimbral was washed under the seas when the Spellplague occured. However, the paragraph (on pg.163 of the FRCG) hedges it's bet by saying that Nimbral may just be staying cloaked in illusion. Have the FR powers that be made a determination on whether Nimbral is indeed gone? Thanks for any info!

Dracons
Learned Scribe

USA
299 Posts

Posted - 28 May 2010 :  15:41:49  Show Profile  Visit Dracons's Homepage Send Dracons a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I don't think anywhere it says it is or not. Its likely up to the DM. The truth is most likely NDA.

I don't use the 4th edition system or books, though I do own them. If I do switch to 4th edition, my 4th edition Faerun will be alot different.

I love PMs! Please send me a message. Even if its Hi.
Go to Top of Page

Markustay
Realms Explorer extraordinaire

USA
15724 Posts

Posted - 28 May 2010 :  23:36:43  Show Profile Send Markustay a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Things are left vague and unanswered on-purpose in 4e - its for you, the DM, to decide. You can have it invisible, explorable (Adventure!) ruins beneath the waves, or go with an Atlantis-style thing, with either water-breathers (Sea Folk) or air-breathers (Aventi). You can even mix & max - only part of it may have survived invisible.

I actually like that approach - it is similar to how much of the material was originally presented for FR - more rumor then fact. I don't like that the world needed to be 'washed clean' to achieve that, but I do understand (as a long-time GM) where they were coming from with that decision.

"I have never in my life learned anything from any man who agreed with me" --- Dudley Field Malone

Go to Top of Page

Barastir
Master of Realmslore

Brazil
1602 Posts

Posted - 25 Jun 2010 :  14:01:49  Show Profile Send Barastir a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Markustay
I actually like that approach - it is similar to how much of the material was originally presented for FR - more rumor then fact. I don't like that the world needed to be 'washed clean' to achieve that, but I do understand (as a long-time GM) where they were coming from with that decision.



The second edition FR box was also full of "misinformation" and rumors...

Like the entry about the Fall of Myth Drannor, in which "The elven hero Fflar, captain of Myth Drannor, slew a nycaloth with his bare hands then, or so the legends say. Others tell of a magical blade, Demonbane, wielded by him that day".

Or the Netheril entry, without the precise time of its fall: "It is believed Netheril died some 2,500 years ago"

It is very nice, cause the DMs can develop their own versions of the facts, and writers and game designers have something to work in future products...

"Goodness is not a natural state, but must be
fought for to be attained and maintained.
Lead by example.
Let your deeds speak your intentions.
Goodness radiated from the heart."

The Paladin's Virtues, excerpt from the "Quentin's Monograph"
(by Ed Greenwood)

Edited by - Barastir on 25 Jun 2010 14:02:53
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2025 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000