| Author |  Topic  | 
              
                | DinninSeeker
 
  
 
		  Australia53 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 27 May 2010 :  07:53:25         
 |  
           	| Hey Guys 
 Just a question, ive had it come up a few times with other party memebers.  Do paladins need to be good?  They Worship a specific diety so if its a LE one then that should still work right?  Thats my arguemnt, the other people say that they have to be LG
 |  
                      | "Use yer heads! A barnyard goose tastes better 'an a wild one cause it don't use its muscles. The same oughta hold true for a giant's brains!"
 Bruenor Battlehammer
 |  | 
              
                | SianSenior Scribe
 
    
 
		  Denmark596 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 27 May 2010 :  08:11:14         
 |  
                      | 3.5e (and earlier) clearly says Paladin have to be LG (not accounting the adaptions other places which made Paladinseque classes for CG, LE and CE) ... 4e as far as i remember/aware just retooled it into a holy warrior of their god, making them able to be all alignments |  
                      | what happened to the queen? she's much more hysterical than usual
 She's a women, it happens once a month
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | DraconsLearned Scribe
 
   
 
		  USA299 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 27 May 2010 :  09:11:03         
 |  
                      | Just what Sian said. 
 However, in 3.5, not counting any alt rules, Paladins can worship Sune. One of the few gods that allow that.
 
 As a divine caster, Paladins need to worship patron deity. Seeing as Paladins need to be LG by class, that only leaves NG, LG, LN gods. However, like I said above, Sune allows them in her fold.
 |  
                      | I love PMs! Please send me a message. Even if its Hi.
 |  
                      | Edited by - Dracons on 27 May 2010  09:12:14
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | Marquant VolkerLearned Scribe
 
   
 
		  Greece273 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 27 May 2010 :  09:37:25       
 |  
                      | Perhaps the Blackguard Prc is what you are looking for? In my campaign paladins have to be LG, and most of the time they are humans or individuals who was raised among humans.
 Imho not all Gods sponsor paladins, they may have Holy warriors but no paladins for example i cant imagine a Elven paladin of Correlon, neither the Elven cultoure nor the Aligment (Elves tend to be chaotic)
 
 
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | DraconsLearned Scribe
 
   
 
		  USA299 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 27 May 2010 :  11:26:00         
 |  
                      | See, I had a half-elf half-orc paladin of Corelleon player. But we used the paladin of freedom varient for that. |  
                      | I love PMs! Please send me a message. Even if its Hi.
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | Aerik DeValloSeeker
 
  
 
		  USA87 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 27 May 2010 :  13:31:58       
 |  
                      | In the book Unearthed Arcana, there are some Paladin variants. The Prestige Paladin is particularly tasty. Check out Unearthed Arcana for all your class/rule variant needs. |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | Ashe RavenheartGreat Reader
 
      
 
		  USA3252 Posts
 |  | 
              
                | Alystra IllianniisGreat Reader
 
      
 
		  USA3750 Posts
 |  | 
              
                | Sill AliasSenior Scribe
 
    
 
		  Kazakhstan588 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 28 May 2010 :  04:42:01         
 |  
                      | Is there no LN paladin? |  
                      | You can hear many tales from many mouths. The most difficult is to know which of them are not lies.   -   Sill Alias
 
 "May your harp be unstrung, your dreams die and all your songs be unsung."  -  curse of the harper, The Code of the Harpers 2 ed.
 
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | Ashe RavenheartGreat Reader
 
      
 
		  USA3252 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 28 May 2010 :  05:04:41       
 |  
                      | Paladins are seen more as having strong belief in their ideals, so the usually don't fall into any neutralities regarding alignment. |  
                      | I actually DO know everything. I just have a very poor index of my knowledge.
 
 Ashe's Character Sheet
 
 Alphabetized Index of Realms NPCs
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | JakkGreat Reader
 
      
 
		  Canada2165 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 28 May 2010 :  05:23:02       
 |  
                      | quote:Originally posted by Alystra Illianniis
 
 That book mentioned other ways to create variants, as I recall, and there was a write-up in a 3.5 era Warriors-themed issue of Dragon. (forget which #- I have it, but not at hand at the moment) It had several variants (the original version of the Unearthed Arcana materail, i believe) and ideas for creating new ones, as well.
 
 
 
 DragonDex is a beautiful thing...
 
 Paladins, Variant:
 "Not Your Father's Do-Gooder" Mike McArtor #323(p.104)
 "Law and Chaos" Jonathan Drain #349(p.92)
 
 I'm pretty sure the first article is the one you're thinking of, Alystra.
  
 Edit: In my campaigns, we allow paladins of almost any deity, and therefore almost any alignment; the only restriction is that the paladin never sway from the alignment of his or her deity. Deities of nature don't have paladins; they have rangers for that kind of thing.
  |  
                      | Playing in the Realms since the Old Grey Box (1987)... and *still* having fun with material published before 2008, despite the NDA'd lore.
 
 If it's comparable in power with non-magical abilities, it's not magic.
 |  
                      | Edited by - Jakk on 28 May 2010  05:26:37
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | DraconsLearned Scribe
 
   
 
		  USA299 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 28 May 2010 :  05:44:09         
 |  
                      | I made a bunch of Paladins for various Greater Gods. Each of them had their own special powers and abilites based on such greater god. Have yet to put it in play. |  
                      | I love PMs! Please send me a message. Even if its Hi.
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | KatansAcolyte
 
 
 
		  Germany7 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 28 May 2010 :  08:32:23         
 |  
                      | 3.X pallys are usually LG, however, there are a bunch of variants for different alignments. See Unearthed Arcana and various Dragon Magazines. 
 A Paladin's alignment is in no way linked to his or her deity's. The "one step" restriction that applies to Clerics does not apply to paladins.
 |  
                      | Edited by - Katans on 28 May 2010  08:32:51
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | DraconsLearned Scribe
 
   
 
		  USA299 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 28 May 2010 :  11:13:28         
 |  
                      | quote:Originally posted by Katans
 
 A Paladin's alignment is in no way linked to his or her deity's. The "one step" restriction that applies to Clerics does not apply to paladins.
 
 
 
 It is in Forgotten Realms.
 
 Look under the Paladin description in Forgotten Realms Campaign Guide.
 All Paladins are devotted to a patron deity, chosen at the start of their career as paladins. The paladin's deity must be lawful good, lawful neutral, or neutral good.  The only exception is for Sune. Under the Choosing a Patron it goes on to state that all divine casters, even druids, rangers and such, must be within one step of their deity alignment.
 |  
                      | I love PMs! Please send me a message. Even if its Hi.
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | Alystra IllianniisGreat Reader
 
      
 
		  USA3750 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 28 May 2010 :  20:58:25       
 |  
                      | Thank you, Jakk, for those issue #'s. I think it was the one in #349- is that the one with the two chicks in slit skirts with swords on the cover? Or was that #323? I remember it had articles on Barbarian, Ranger, and Rogue combos, a great article on Monk variants, and a few small PrC's. They did another one like it for spellcasting classes the very next issue. (I loved the bard variants, especially the Green Ear!) |  
                      | The Goddess is alive, and magic is afoot.
 
 "Where Science ends, Magic begins"  -Spiral, Uncanny X-Men #491
 
 "You idiots! You've captured their STUNT doubles!" -Spaceballs
 
 Lothir's character background/stats: http://forum.candlekeep.com/pop_profile.asp?mode=display&id=5469
 
 My stories:
 http://z3.invisionfree.com/Mickeys_Comic_Tavern/index.php?showforum=188
 
 Lothir, courtesy of Sylinde (Deviant Art)/Luaxena (Chosen of Eilistraee)
 http://sylinde.deviantart.com/#/d2z6e4u
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | JorkensGreat Reader
 
      
 
		  Norway2950 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 29 May 2010 :  09:49:38       
 |  
                      | There's nothing wrong with having evil champions of the gods or "black Knights", but using the term Paladin seems wrong to me. Champion yes, but not Paladin. The whole archetype is tied to the idea of the valorous chivalric knights of good. I am not a fan of the class in the first place, especially in the Realms as I think it fits in a world with a clearer positioning of "good" and "evil", but the whole idea of the class is to much tied to the idea of a warrior and protector of what's seen as right to be modified in my opinion. |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | Wooly RupertMaster of Mischief
 
  
      
 
		  USA36965 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 29 May 2010 :  15:19:55       
 |  
                      | quote:Originally posted by Jorkens
 
 There's nothing wrong with having evil champions of the gods or "black Knights", but using the term Paladin seems wrong to me. Champion yes, but not Paladin. The whole archetype is tied to the idea of the valorous chivalric knights of good. I am not a fan of the class in the first place, especially in the Realms as I think it fits in a world with a clearer positioning of "good" and "evil", but the whole idea of the class is to much tied to the idea of a warrior and protector of what's seen as right to be modified in my opinion.
 
 
 
 Agreed, all the way across. I've also advocated using a term like Champion to describe a divinely souped up warrior-type.
 |  
                      | Candlekeep Forums Moderator
 
 Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
 http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
 
 I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
  |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | JorkensGreat Reader
 
      
 
		  Norway2950 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 29 May 2010 :  19:12:07       
 |  
                      | One could use the Crusader class from the deities books as a model for various holy warriors, but ( I could be wrong here, its been years since I looked at the class) I seem to remember them being seriously over-powered. |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | ThauramarthSenior Scribe
 
    
 
		  United Kingdom734 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 29 May 2010 :  19:16:03       
 |  
                      | Although it is probably not too relevant anymore, under 1E, there were eight NPC "paladin" classes, published in two early issues of Dragon Magazine: the anit-paladin (CE, #39), and seven more paladin-like NPC classes (#106): Myrikan (NG), Garath (CG), Lyan (LN), Paramander (N), Fantra (CN), Illrigger (LE), and Arrikan (NE). |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | FingalSeeker
 
  
 
		56 Posts  | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 03 Jun 2010 :  12:23:02       
 |  
                      | I've always been a fan of allowing paladins for evil gods - a long as it makes sense. Bane would perhaps be the obvious one. 
 I've never really liked paladins as a base class though. They seem much better suited as a Prc. Does anyone have any experience running them thus?
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | woodwwadLearned Scribe
 
   
 
		  USA267 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 11 Jun 2010 :  04:26:25         
 |  
                      | I really like the idea of each extreme alignment having a paladine as the Unearthed Arcana discribes. 
 I do not like the idea of LG paladine of Sune, not a good idea.  CG paladines are the way to go there.
 |  
                      | Check out my reviews on youtube of Forgotten Realms and other rpg products.  http://www.youtube.com/user/woodwwad?feature=mhum
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | TalwynLearned Scribe
 
   
 
		  Australia222 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 15 Jun 2010 :  08:05:33         
 |  
                      | quote:Originally posted by Dinnin
 
 Hey Guys
 
 Just a question, ive had it come up a few times with other party memebers.  Do paladins need to be good?  They Worship a specific diety so if its a LE one then that should still work right?  Thats my arguemnt, the other people say that they have to be LG
 
 
 
 It depends on which edition of D&D you're playing.
 
 Ed's 1 & 2 clearly stated [except for those that worship Sune in FR] that Paladins MUST be Lawful Good.
 
 In 3e & 3.5 the alignment requirements relaxed a little bit.
 
 As for 4e, I don't know as I don't play that system
 
 Ultimately what it comes down to is what the DM of your campaign decides is the ruling. The rule books are there to give you a framework in which you can play a game: you don't have to follow them to the letter if you so choose. Numerous campaigns have "house rules" as DM's & players alter the rules so as to make the game experience more fun for them.
 
 The only limits are what your imagination and creativity can come up with ;)
 
 
 
 
 |  
                      | Over the centuries, mankind has tried many ways of combating the forces of evil...prayer, fasting, good works and so on.
 Up until Doom, no one seemed to have thought about the double-barrel shotgun.
 EAT LEADEN DEATH DEMON!
 Terry Pratchett
 
 
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | Cleric GenericSenior Scribe
 
    
 
		  United Kingdom565 Posts
 |  | 
              
                | Nicolai WithanderMaster of Realmslore
 
     
 
		  Denmark1093 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 16 Jun 2010 :  00:35:32       
 |  
                      | A paladin is per difinition a holy warrior, and since the term "holy" is per difinition "good", then per difinition a paladin is a holy, good warrior of good church!!! 
 If you want an evil version of a paladin well then Black Guard or Fallen Paladin is the choise for you.
 
 But having a neutral or evil paladin is per difinition NOT possible!!!
 |  
                      | Edited by - Nicolai Withander on 16 Jun 2010  00:40:25
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | Cleric GenericSenior Scribe
 
    
 
		  United Kingdom565 Posts
 |  | 
              
                | Wooly RupertMaster of Mischief
 
  
      
 
		  USA36965 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 16 Jun 2010 :  01:10:10       
 |  
                      | quote:Originally posted by Nicolai Withander
 
 A paladin is per difinition a holy warrior, and since the term "holy" is per difinition "good", then per difinition a paladin is a holy, good warrior of good church!!!
 
 
 
 This stance does, however, allow for the possibility of CG or NG paladins.
 
 However...
 
 Holy is generally accepted to mean good, particularly in D&D. That is not the dictionary definition, though. From dictionary.com:
 
 
 quote:1. specially recognized as or declared sacred by religious use or authority; consecrated: holy ground.
 2. dedicated or devoted to the service of god, the church, or religion: a holy man.
 
 
 Therefore...
 
 
 quote:Originally posted by Nicolai Withander
 
 
 But having a neutral or evil paladin is per difinition NOT possible!!!
 
 
 
 By defining a paladin as a holy warrior, a neutral or evil paladin is by definition possible.
 
 Granted, I do -- as I've stated before -- feel that only LG types should be called paladin, and others should get another title. But I also think that if we play the dictionary card, we need to make sure we're using the word correctly.
  |  
                      | Candlekeep Forums Moderator
 
 Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
 http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
 
 I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
  |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | frogleggLearned Scribe
 
   
 
		317 Posts  | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 16 Jun 2010 :  01:11:01       
 |  
                      | quote:Originally posted by dracons
 
 Just what Sian said.
 
 However, in 3.5, not counting any alt rules, Paladins can worship Sune. One of the few gods that allow that.
 
 As a divine caster, Paladins need to worship patron deity. Seeing as Paladins need to be LG by class, that only leaves NG, LG, LN gods. However, like I said above, Sune allows them in her fold.
 
 
 Unless I am wrong, Sune's paladins could also be CG as well.
 
 John
 |  
                      | Long live Alias and Dragonbait! Kate Novak and Jeff Grubb the Realms need you more then ever!
 
 On my word as a sage nothing within these pages is false, but not all of it may prove to be true. - Elminster of Shadowdale
 
 The Old Grey Box gets better with age!
 |  
                      | Edited by - froglegg on 16 Jun 2010  01:11:38
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | Joran NobleheartSenior Scribe
 
    
 
		  USA495 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 16 Jun 2010 :  02:20:24         
 |  
                      | quote:Originally posted by froglegg
 
 
 quote:Originally posted by dracons
 
 Just what Sian said.
 
 However, in 3.5, not counting any alt rules, Paladins can worship Sune. One of the few gods that allow that.
 
 As a divine caster, Paladins need to worship patron deity. Seeing as Paladins need to be LG by class, that only leaves NG, LG, LN gods. However, like I said above, Sune allows them in her fold.
 
 
 Unless I am wrong, Sune's paladins could also be CG as well.
 
 John
 
 
 
 I think a lot of people have a misunderstanding of this, actually. The way I think it is, Sune is the only CG deity that allows paladins, who are LG. She is the exception to the one-step rule. I guess she figures she's cute enough to get away with it, and no one will complain.
  |  
                      | Paladinic Ethos
 Saint Joran Nobleheart
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | Nicolai WithanderMaster of Realmslore
 
     
 
		  Denmark1093 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 16 Jun 2010 :  12:26:20       
 |  
                      | As long as anything is called "Holy" then it is not possible to be anything but "good". One could ofc have an unholy warrior with the same abilities as a paladin but it would then not be a paladin. 
 If one is holy and evil its called UN-holy. So...
 
 If a Paladin is a "Holy" man/warrior/dude... then he can only and I repeat ONLY be of good allignment!!!
 
 
 
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | Wooly RupertMaster of Mischief
 
  
      
 
		  USA36965 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 16 Jun 2010 :  12:58:28       
 |  
                      | quote:Originally posted by Nicolai Withander
 
 As long as anything is called "Holy" then it is not possible to be anything but "good". One could ofc have an unholy warrior with the same abilities as a paladin but it would then not be a paladin.
 
 If one is holy and evil its called UN-holy. So...
 
 If a Paladin is a "Holy" man/warrior/dude... then he can only and I repeat ONLY be of good allignment!!!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The dictionary does not agree with you, at least with regards to the definition of holy.
 |  
                      | Candlekeep Forums Moderator
 
 Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
 http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
 
 I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
  |  
                      | Edited by - Wooly Rupert on 16 Jun 2010  12:59:26
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | Nicolai WithanderMaster of Realmslore
 
     
 
		  Denmark1093 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 16 Jun 2010 :  13:37:06       
 |  
                      | What does it say about holy then? 
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                
                |  Topic  |  |