Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 General Forgotten Realms Chat
 Core races in Forgotten realms in 4th edition
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

The Sage
Procrastinator Most High

Australia
31799 Posts

Posted - 27 Mar 2008 :  23:54:56  Show Profile Send The Sage a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by BlackAce

They're a 4e core race aren't they? In which case their presence in FR probably comes down to tie-ins and compatability for the "lure in as many fresh magic players/Drizzt fans/ newbies as we can," business pitch of 4e.
Which is kinda disappointing to hear, if that is the case.

Being such an exotic core race shouldn't be the only justification used for why a particular race may then be officially found within a setting specific campaign.

I wonder whether presenting them as a "option" would've been more appropriate.

It's likely that, as more information about the Dragonborn in the Realms is revealed... the purpose behind the decision to include them in FR 4e will become evident.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)

"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood

Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage
Go to Top of Page

Rinonalyrna Fathomlin
Great Reader

USA
7106 Posts

Posted - 28 Mar 2008 :  13:22:16  Show Profile  Visit Rinonalyrna Fathomlin's Homepage Send Rinonalyrna Fathomlin a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by The Sage


Being such an exotic core race shouldn't be the only justification used for why a particular race may then be officially found within a setting specific campaign.

I wonder whether presenting them as a "option" would've been more appropriate.



The rationale behind making dragonborn a core race is that the designers believe dragon characters will appeal to a lot of players (and they most likely have evidence that leads to such a conclusion).

But I would agree that just because a race is "core" doesn't mean there needs to be a very large number of them in any given setting.

"Instead of asking why we sleep, it might make sense to ask why we wake. Perchance we live to dream. From that perspective, the sea of troubles we navigate in the workaday world might be the price we pay for admission to another night in the world of dreams."
--Richard Greene (letter to Time)
Go to Top of Page

Amluril Dire-Weaselbane
Acolyte

United Kingdom
20 Posts

Posted - 28 Mar 2008 :  17:54:18  Show Profile  Visit Amluril Dire-Weaselbane's Homepage Send Amluril Dire-Weaselbane a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I think if you don't want Dragonborn in your campaign - don't include them!

I've been running realms campaigns for years and have largely ignored the sub-standard canon material (especially the novels) and favoured my own twist on events - It is fantasy, and fiction so events are free to be dictated by the DM.

I had a huge problem with half orcs in 3E, if we were going to have half orc core characters then why not half ogres, half giants, half fiends and half dragons, or to hell with it, half Kobolds, half stirges, half.... the list could go on (and probably does in parallel alternate reality or "crystal sphere" (remember them?))

Quite frankly come 4E (if i even decide to switch) I won't be welcoming Half Dragons or Dragontouched or whatever into my campaign, they don't fit in the realms - even Saurials didn't fit in the realms.

My patience is running thin with Wan*ers of the coast, I'm tired of events / characters / races being shunted changed and erased to suit whatever overpriced poor qualiity product they happen to be selling at the time.
Oh so sudenly we only have 3 types of elf? So how is that going to fit into the dynamics of the existing realms? What next? Humans only come in 2 colours - White and slightly creamy pink colour?

PLEASE!
Go to Top of Page

Fillow
Master of Realmslore

France
1608 Posts

Posted - 30 Mar 2008 :  10:01:56  Show Profile  Visit Fillow's Homepage Send Fillow a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by The Sage

quote:
Originally posted by Alisttair

I think Gnomes started dissappearing since 3.5 but that is only my opinion.

They are the "forgotten folk" for a reason.


About D&D4, I believe I read that gnomes would be a playable race in ther next Monster Manual.
About FR, Authors and creators cannot have erased this race from the ground of Toril ! Even if there is no hero who is equal to Drizzt or El within the Garl children, we sometimes meet few of them in novels.
I think to a Helm priest in "Temple Hill", a community in Soldiers of Ice, the svirfs from Underdark, aso

Moreover, if the race was bound to disappear from Toril, I think we had heard about the gnome pantheon...

I agree to make an effort to a 100-years-jump, but I refuse to disappear !

Fillow Mahlemiut Lead-dog, rock gnome, ranger of Baervan and Namer of Oghma.

"Today is a good day to smile",
Fillow Big'n'Book Mahlemiut 'Lead-dog', Son of Garl, Wanderer of the Masked Leaf and Namer of Oghma.

- Fight in the arena and have fun ! :
La brute.com
- Feel free to take part to these projects : Post-Spellplague bibliography ; 4E index project ; Taverns and inns of the Realms ; Dogs of the Realms ; Descriptions of places in the novels ; forums, RPG, FR Abbreviations and Acronyms
- Come and have a look at the already asked questions from the Forgotten Realms Trivia Challenge

I am a French FR fan, so please forgive my lapses in English language and do not hesitate to correct me. Thanks a lot.
Go to Top of Page

BARDOBARBAROS
Senior Scribe

Greece
581 Posts

Posted - 30 Mar 2008 :  20:46:49  Show Profile  Visit BARDOBARBAROS's Homepage Send BARDOBARBAROS a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Amluril Dire-Weaselbane

I think if you don't want Dragonborn in your campaign - don't include them!

I've been running realms campaigns for years and have largely ignored the sub-standard canon material (especially the novels) and favoured my own twist on events - It is fantasy, and fiction so events are free to be dictated by the DM.

I had a huge problem with half orcs in 3E, if we were going to have half orc core characters then why not half ogres, half giants, half fiends and half dragons, or to hell with it, half Kobolds, half stirges, half.... the list could go on (and probably does in parallel alternate reality or "crystal sphere" (remember them?))

Quite frankly come 4E (if i even decide to switch) I won't be welcoming Half Dragons or Dragontouched or whatever into my campaign, they don't fit in the realms - even Saurials didn't fit in the realms.

My patience is running thin with Wan*ers of the coast, I'm tired of events / characters / races being shunted changed and erased to suit whatever overpriced poor qualiity product they happen to be selling at the time.
Oh so sudenly we only have 3 types of elf? So how is that going to fit into the dynamics of the existing realms? What next? Humans only come in 2 colours - White and slightly creamy pink colour?

PLEASE!



There is truth in your words.. And after all if the rules of 4th edition will not satisfy us why to use them ???why not continue playing 2nd oe 3.5 edition?? The choice is ours..

BARDOBARBAROS DOES NOT KILL.
HE DECAPITATES!!!


"The city changes, but the fools within it remain always the same" (Edwin Odesseiron- Baldur's gate 2)
Go to Top of Page

Rinonalyrna Fathomlin
Great Reader

USA
7106 Posts

Posted - 31 Mar 2008 :  00:06:01  Show Profile  Visit Rinonalyrna Fathomlin's Homepage Send Rinonalyrna Fathomlin a Private Message  Reply with Quote
As Fillow said, gnomes have not simply "disappeared" from 4E or from the FR campaign setting.

When they will be made into a player race (as opposed to simply being put in the MM) is the real question.

"Instead of asking why we sleep, it might make sense to ask why we wake. Perchance we live to dream. From that perspective, the sea of troubles we navigate in the workaday world might be the price we pay for admission to another night in the world of dreams."
--Richard Greene (letter to Time)
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2025 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000