| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Hyset |
Posted - 15 Jan 2009 : 15:22:43
Hi folks.
I know it has been mentioned several times, and there are quite a few lists all over the internet for the Timeline or the reading Order.
Nevertheless I am still seeking a list where someone who really knows them all(from Wotc? from Candlekeep? Ed?)
does give a correct reading order list for ALL novels of the FR.
I have read them all, from the beginning, starting in 1988 with "Spellfire". At the moment I am a bit behind, reading "The FIGHTERS" at the moment.
My clue for the correct reading order is: Looking on the publishing date of the first novel of a Triloy or series. Then read the series completely, if the contents is connected. If not, go with the publishing date of every single book.
Most of the times it will not matter. But there are some things that are relevant.
I stopped reading "Queen of the debths" as soon as I recognized the the series "Year of the rogue dragon" should be read before that book.
Correct does not mean in timeline!
I think "Homeland" should be read AFTER "The crystal shard". It was meant that way by the author...
So is there a correct reading list (Novel by Novel) for the FR?
I think of course it should start with Moonshea trilogie.....
regards
Harry
|
| 29 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Wooly Rupert |
Posted - 17 Mar 2009 : 15:08:09
quote:
Originally posted by edappel
Sorry 'bout my english, I read well, but my writing is terrible.
No worries. We have more than a few Americans here who flub the language on a regular basis. I often do it myself, but it's usually intentional for me.  |
| edappel |
Posted - 17 Mar 2009 : 14:58:00
Hyset, i really thinks u r the biggest reader of FR novels. Congrats.
I`ve already read 40 books... But the biggest problem is that i`m from brazil, so its f*c**n* hard to buy them... (the shipping rate and the exchange rate makes it 4 times expensive to us). I was planning to read all of them in 20 years, but after seeing the completed list.... I'll be glad reading 100 books.
And now, with my son`s born... It will take a LOONG time til reading 100.
Sorry 'bout my english, I read well, but my writing is terrible. |
| Hyset |
Posted - 21 Jan 2009 : 11:14:39
quote:
Originally posted by darkcrow
I have 113 more books to go before I'm all caught up.
From the books published till jan. 2009, I have 37 more books to go.
But I think I will not be able to read more than 16 Books a year, having other things to do, play, watch, listen and read, so it will take till 2011 or 2012 to catch up.
And as I do not start a trilogy till the final book is published (or is expected to be published within a month), I will not really catch up completely.
|
| darkcrow |
Posted - 21 Jan 2009 : 01:00:50
I have 113 more books to go before I'm all caught up. |
| Hyset |
Posted - 20 Jan 2009 : 23:37:49
quote:
Originally posted by darkcrow
I myself am reading them in sets of trilogies and series by publishing dates. I understand your meaning on choosing your books by your interests but if I did it that way, I would never get to some of the uninteresting looking ones. For example, I just finished Twilight Giants Trilogy and was really dreading having to read that one. I'm thinking " a trilogy about giants, how dull is that. They're always the slow witted ones getting defeated in battle. After reading it though, I was quite impressed. The trilogy was actually pretty good. OK, there is my 2 coppers.
That exactly the way I'm doing it. Would not want to leave out a single book. You never might know.... 
But you have quite a list before you. The Twilight Giants are from 1994. Still about 200 books left till you catch up |
| darkcrow |
Posted - 20 Jan 2009 : 00:56:32
quote:
Originally posted by Rinonalyrna Fathomlin
In case it wasn't mentioned yet, there is no "one correct order" for reading the FR novels. You can of course choose to read the novels in published order*, but that's not the "right" way to read them, and it's something you are imposing on yourself rather than something suggested or recommended by WotC or fans.
*And by the way, I don't recommend this. You enjoy books more when you are reading them out of interest, not because "this one was published first."
I myself am reading them in sets of trilogies and series by publishing dates. I understand your meaning on choosing your books by your interests but if I did it that way, I would never get to some of the uninteresting looking ones. For example, I just finished Twilight Giants Trilogy and was really dreading having to read that one. I'm thinking " a trilogy about giants, how dull is that. They're always the slow witted ones getting defeated in battle. After reading it though, I was quite impressed. The trilogy was actually pretty good. OK, there is my 2 coppers. |
| BEAST |
Posted - 19 Jan 2009 : 08:05:41
quote:
Originally posted by mnb128
I agree. I remember reading Daughter of the Drow and there was a reference to a book written by one of the Harpells up in Longsaddle about a drow gone good somewhere in the north. I can't remember which Drizzt book it was referring to (Streams of Silver, BEAST?), but it made me smile.
I haven't read that one of EC's, buddy. Sorry.
Drizzt did visit Longsaddle in Streams of Silver, so that makes sense. |
| mnb128 |
Posted - 17 Jan 2009 : 15:36:57
quote:
Originally posted by swifty
i personally love it when there is a vague reference to current goings on in the realms.in midnights mask there is a reference to dragons acting strangely.its set in the year of rogue dragons.
I agree. I remember reading Daughter of the Drow and there was a reference to a book written by one of the Harpells up in Longsaddle about a drow gone good somewhere in the north. I can't remember which Drizzt book it was referring to (Streams of Silver, BEAST?), but it made me smile. I've had similar experiences with other books along the way, so there definitely is something to be said about reading in chronological order. |
| Erik Scott de Bie |
Posted - 17 Jan 2009 : 07:46:14
quote:
Originally posted by Dagnirion
quote:
Originally posted by Erik Scott de Bie
*Ahem* It's been documented that Ghostwalker contains a tiny reference to A Thousand Orcs--as a sort of "tall tale" reference.
-I just read it recently, but I don't really remember anything. Was it a reference made by the Lord Singer concerning his political rival traveling to Silverymoon, and a mention of Alutriel's war with Obould, and the Orcs, and so on and so forth? Or, was it a mention about the Rangers in the area *not* being Drizzt Do'Urdenish, or something to that effect?
Passage on page 23, starts with "A dark elf ranger? Rubbish!"
quote:
Originally posted by The Sage
quote:
Originally posted by Erik Scott de Bie
There might be a few such easter eggs in Downshadow--just sayin'.
Interesting.
Can you say whether they might reference other current post-Spellplague novels, or pre-Spellplague novels?
Ha! You know me, my friend--can neither confirm nor deny. 
Cheers |
| BEAST |
Posted - 16 Jan 2009 : 14:18:16
quote:
Originally posted by Hyset
It's more than 15 years that I read "homeland", so i don't know if it was written with or without reference to the earlier books.
(Drizzt remebering the past?)
I don't know about Homeland, but the final "Drizzt Diary" or Epilogue of Sojourn mentions Wulfgar and the minor side-character Agorwal of Termalaine, both of whom we do not actually see in action until The Crystal Shard.
I think we're also treated to some insights from Drizzt in the Drizzt Diaries of the Entreri-and-Jarlaxle series "The Sellswords": insights that Drizzt couldn't possibly have known at the time, but which he must pick up at a later date and then project back into his understanding of the story.
Personally, I recommend reading "The Icewind Dale Trilogy" first, before "The Dark Elf Trilogy", simply because it works best thematically, or atmospherically, that way. Drizzt was new and mysterious in RAS's first series, and it was precisely that air of mysteriousness that led fans to call for an explanation of the drow's background and which led to the next mini-series. I would hate for people to miss out on the intangible quality of that air of mystery in "TIDT" because they already had everything spilled to them when reading "TDET" first.
But...it's like...you know...whatever... |
| Kyrene |
Posted - 16 Jan 2009 : 08:12:56
For the most part I enjoy reading the novels as I buy them. Afterall, they are but mere glimpses into the goings on in the Realms at a certain point in time. When they happen to tie together—however loosely, as Erik's tip-of-hat references or Steven's cameos do for example—it makes for even more enjoyable reading, but it is not required to know the exact story (read the novel) they refer to. Besides, following a strategy of reading the novels in strict chronological order, will require that you wait until your deathbed in case you missed some future written story set during or prior to the ones you already have. |
| Richard Lee Byers |
Posted - 16 Jan 2009 : 04:47:24
For what it's worth, I don't think you have to read Year of Rogue Dragons to enjoy Queen of the Depths. I hope you don't. I tried to write QotD so it stood on its own. |
| Wooly Rupert |
Posted - 16 Jan 2009 : 03:15:10
quote:
Originally posted by Dagnirion
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert
And Troy Denning, in particular, likes to reuse his characters from prior books -- Ruha is the best example of this.
-This is not really what I was getting at. One author using his characters over and over (even if the stories are related or not, interconnected or not) is one thing. Troy Denning wrote, The Parched Sea and The Return of the Archwizards trilogy, for example. James Lowder wrote both Ring of Winter and Crusade, so the same thing is at work there. I was thinking more along the lines of what Erik did, mentioning events and/or people from novels completely extraneous from his own, just for "flavor text".
How about Steven Schend using Kyriani and Osco Salibuck from the comics in his novels? (Though the original Osco was just referred to, and not used as a character, the way Kyri was.) |
| The Sage |
Posted - 15 Jan 2009 : 23:30:42
quote:
Originally posted by Erik Scott de Bie
There might be a few such easter eggs in Downshadow--just sayin'.
Interesting.
Can you say whether they might reference other current post-Spellplague novels, or pre-Spellplague novels?
|
| swifty |
Posted - 15 Jan 2009 : 21:45:58
i personally love it when there is a vague reference to current goings on in the realms.in midnights mask there is a reference to dragons acting strangely.its set in the year of rogue dragons. |
| Lord Karsus |
Posted - 15 Jan 2009 : 21:44:37
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert
And Troy Denning, in particular, likes to reuse his characters from prior books -- Ruha is the best example of this.
-This is not really what I was getting at. One author using his characters over and over (even if the stories are related or not, interconnected or not) is one thing. Troy Denning wrote, The Parched Sea and The Return of the Archwizards trilogy, for example. James Lowder wrote both Ring of Winter and Crusade, so the same thing is at work there. I was thinking more along the lines of what Erik did, mentioning events and/or people from novels completely extraneous from his own, just for "flavor text". |
| Lord Karsus |
Posted - 15 Jan 2009 : 21:39:38
quote:
Originally posted by Erik Scott de Bie
*Ahem* It's been documented that Ghostwalker contains a tiny reference to A Thousand Orcs--as a sort of "tall tale" reference.
I like to put in tiny references like that, which honor other books but don't in any way affect them--nor do you have to have read the books under discussion. Just a little tip of the hat.
There might be a few such easter eggs in Downshadow--just sayin'.
Carry on. *ahem!*
Cheers
-I just read it recently, but I don't really remember anything. Was it a reference made by the Lord Singer concerning his political rival traveling to Silverymoon, and a mention of Alutriel's war with Obould, and the Orcs, and so on and so forth? Or, was it a mention about the Rangers in the area *not* being Drizzt Do'Urdenish, or something to that effect? |
| Wooly Rupert |
Posted - 15 Jan 2009 : 21:22:24
quote:
Originally posted by Dagnirion
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert
And a lot of trilogies don't affect any of the others, either...
-No, no they don't. Generally speaking, I prefer when the events from other novels get mentions and nods in other novels (that are not inherently related. As in, something other than mentions and segue from one Drizzt trilogy to another). I am trying to think of an example, but as I am having some difficulty, it seems to be a bit more rare than I am thinking it.
In the end of Ring of Winter, we find out that Artus Cimber rented his apartment from Razor John, the fletcher from Crusade who joined the fight against the Tuigan. And it was Danilo Thann who inadvertently gave the butler at the Stalwart Club his devilish appearance.
Danilo also briefly chatted with Liriel Baenre, when she was trying to get into Waterdeep.
And Troy Denning, in particular, likes to reuse his characters from prior books -- Ruha is the best example of this. |
| Erik Scott de Bie |
Posted - 15 Jan 2009 : 20:51:07
*Ahem* It's been documented that Ghostwalker contains a tiny reference to A Thousand Orcs--as a sort of "tall tale" reference.
I like to put in tiny references like that, which honor other books but don't in any way affect them--nor do you have to have read the books under discussion. Just a little tip of the hat.
There might be a few such easter eggs in Downshadow--just sayin'.
Carry on. *ahem!*
Cheers
Mod edit: changed a stray "{" back to a "[" so that the code worked correctly. |
| Lord Karsus |
Posted - 15 Jan 2009 : 20:02:00
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert
And a lot of trilogies don't affect any of the others, either...
-No, no they don't. Generally speaking, I prefer when the events from other novels get mentions and nods in other novels (that are not inherently related. As in, something other than mentions and segue from one Drizzt trilogy to another). I am trying to think of an example, but as I am having some difficulty, it seems to be a bit more rare than I am thinking it. |
| Christopher_Rowe |
Posted - 15 Jan 2009 : 19:31:27
I support the notion that even the word "should" is a little too heavily freighted toward prescription for this discussion.
Any reading strategy that makes sense and leads to enjoyment and understanding is a productive one, probably.
I will say, though, that I think that Wooly's statement below might not take as many factors into account as it "should."
Cheers!
Christopher
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert
If an author intended story B to be read after story A, then he would set B after A, chronologically.
|
| ranger_of_the_unicorn_run |
Posted - 15 Jan 2009 : 18:51:43
There are a few series where there is some collision and you may end up getting spoilers for another series if you read them, but generally those are fairly obvious. For example, I (still!) haven't finished War of the Spider Queen and I was in a bookstore looking at the latest books a few months ago. I saw Gossamer Plain, and after reading the back, it seemed like it would be a good idea to finish WotSQ before reading that. Most other overlap is pretty easy to spot, so you don't really need to worry that much about order. |
| Wooly Rupert |
Posted - 15 Jan 2009 : 18:34:46
quote:
Originally posted by Dagnirion
-I will support the notion that the Dark Elf trilogy should be read before the Icewind Dale trilogy, and will add that there isn't such thing as a "correct" reading order. Even chronologically, if that is the goal, numerous novels are stand-alone, and books that take place beforehand chronologically don't need to be read to understand or enjoy them.
And a lot of trilogies don't affect any of the others, either... If you're interested in Elaine's Counselors and Kings trilogy, for example, it won't matter at all if you've not read the Finder's Stone trilogy beforehand. You can read all about Erevis Cale without having to worry about what happened in the latest Drizzt book, and the War of the Spider Queen had no influence whatsoever on the events of the Year of Rogue Dragons... |
| Lord Karsus |
Posted - 15 Jan 2009 : 17:36:59
-I will support the notion that the Dark Elf trilogy should be read before the Icewind Dale trilogy, and will add that there isn't such thing as a "correct" reading order. Even chronologically, if that is the goal, numerous novels are stand-alone, and books that take place beforehand chronologically don't need to be read to understand or enjoy them. |
| Rinonalyrna Fathomlin |
Posted - 15 Jan 2009 : 17:16:32
In case it wasn't mentioned yet, there is no "one correct order" for reading the FR novels. You can of course choose to read the novels in published order*, but that's not the "right" way to read them, and it's something you are imposing on yourself rather than something suggested or recommended by WotC or fans.
*And by the way, I don't recommend this. You enjoy books more when you are reading them out of interest, not because "this one was published first." |
| Wooly Rupert |
Posted - 15 Jan 2009 : 16:41:30
Well, if you want to read them chronologically, the best list is O Love's Novels Timeline.
There was a novel chronology on the Wizards site (Presenting... Seven Millennia of Realms Fiction), but it's badly out of date -- they released the list in 2000 or so, and never updated it after that. |
| Hyset |
Posted - 15 Jan 2009 : 16:23:06
Ok, maybe you have a point.
It's more than 15 years that I read "homeland", so i don't know if it was written with or without reference to the earlier books.
(Drizzt remebering the past?)
But that exactly my point: I am not really sure in which order all the novels should be read. Cadderly appears in some Drizzt-Novels, so you should read the cleric quintet before those where he appeares.
I really would like to have a recommendation of the FR-Powers at WotC. Not to start with Sembia, but a Novel-by-Novel list recommendation for those who want to read in the correct order. Who never want to be at a point when reading: "What is he talking about? I should have read the other book first".
I think the list could start with Netheril?
harry
|
| Alisttair |
Posted - 15 Jan 2009 : 16:19:56
I second everything Wooly just said. |
| Wooly Rupert |
Posted - 15 Jan 2009 : 15:58:50
quote:
Originally posted by Hyset
Correct does not mean in timeline!
I think "Homeland" should be read AFTER "The crystal shard". It was meant that way by the author...
Once more, I am going to take extreme exception with this statement. There is absolutely no evidence to support it, and there is evidence against it. RAS has gone on record as saying that Drizzt was a spur of the moment idea, created specifically for The Crystal Shard. It was fan demand and TSR's desire for more money that lead to further books about Drizzt. So Homeland and the attendant books were written later not because RAS wanted the books to be read in that order, but because there was a desire for more of Drizzt's story.
When there is demand to know more about a character, and a prequel is written for them, it's silly to assume that going back to fill in a story means that's the way the author wanted it read. Prequels are usually written later because the demand didn't exist before.
Publishing order is irrelevant. If an author intended story B to be read after story A, then he would set B after A, chronologically. |
|
|
