Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Products
 D&D Core Products
 Apprentice Level Characters?

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]
Rolling Eyes [8|] Confused [?!:] Help [?:] King [3|:]
Laughing [:OD] What [W] Oooohh [:H] Down [:E]

  Check here to include your profile signature.
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
jebeddo Posted - 27 Jun 2005 : 22:32:45
In the 3E DMG, there was a table detailing apprentice level characters for multi-classing at first level, but it was omitted in the 3.5E DMG. Does anyone know why it was removed (was it flawed, unbalanced, etc.)?
2   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
SirUrza Posted - 28 Jun 2005 : 03:47:02
However, that's no reason not to use the 3E rules if your DM allows you to do an apprentice level character.
Kentinal Posted - 27 Jun 2005 : 22:39:48
quote:
Originally posted by jebeddo

In the 3E DMG, there was a table detailing apprentice level characters for multi-classing at first level, but it was omitted in the 3.5E DMG. Does anyone know why it was removed (was it flawed, unbalanced, etc.)?



It was considered flawed as far as I know. Discussions revolved about how to balance two classes as to what abilities should be granted. Some combinations clearly appeared to be unbalanced compared to others. I do not believe there ever was put out an official explaination of why it was removed. It certainly was broke in some respects.

Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000