Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Products
 D&D Core Products
 Sexy tight black leather bodice...

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]
Rolling Eyes [8|] Confused [?!:] Help [?:] King [3|:]
Laughing [:OD] What [W] Oooohh [:H] Down [:E]

  Check here to include your profile signature.
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Purple Dragon Knight Posted - 22 Nov 2004 : 20:52:08
Yes, I bought the deluxe leather-bound Player's Handbook... WHOA!!! It's been a while since I felt THAT satisfied with a D&D product.

So, here it is: leather is "IN" for Christmas... (this now gives me a few gift ideas for what I should be buying for my wife... )
30   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
LaughingWizard Posted - 29 Jan 2005 : 12:33:09
Many Thanks Lysander. Next time I get to a bookstore where I can check out a hard copy of Unearthed Arcana, I'll flip through it. I've really been avoiding the RPG section, as its all greek to me now. Though some of the fluff is nice...
SirUrza Posted - 24 Jan 2005 : 02:24:18
Since I already have 3 copies of the PHB, I think I'll hold off. Though I did this when they had the special edition Spell Compendiums back for AD&D and I ended up regretting it. :)
SiriusBlack Posted - 23 Jan 2005 : 19:41:07
quote:
Originally posted by SirUrza

There's plenty. :)



Decisions, decisions then.
SirUrza Posted - 23 Jan 2005 : 16:41:32
There's plenty. :)
SiriusBlack Posted - 23 Jan 2005 : 04:47:10
quote:
Originally posted by SirUrza

I'm trying to decide if I want to drop this $25 coupon I got from Amazon.com on it or not.



Is there anything upcoming you might be wanting to use the coupon on?
SirUrza Posted - 23 Jan 2005 : 03:30:54
I'm trying to decide if I want to drop this $25 coupon I got from Amazon.com on it or not.

Lysander Posted - 23 Jan 2005 : 02:41:37
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

quote:
Originally posted by Lord Rad

I'm actually in the same boat, PDK. I have all AD&D 2nd ed material and all 3/3.5 material to date. I'm not big fan of crunch and a lot of what I buy is due to completeness and some strange underlying loyalty I have for D&D.

The most used products I have are obviously my FR products, which I read for the fluff alone. I feel that I have no need for any future editions of D&D as 3.5 will work perfectly well as it is and I have all the material I need to actual run with the mechanics of the game. Of course, i'll buy any future FR material, regardless of the rules edition, as it is the fluff I am interested in.



And that sums it up for me, too.


So Mote it be!

PDK, I too suffer from lack of a steady gaming group since the one I was in broke up years ago. (Which is why I'm jumping at the PbEMs as I am ) A times I think it's too bad that the people I would most like to sit around a gaming table with are spread around the globe. As for the book, bought it from Borders with the 25% off customer loyalty coupon. That helped ease my shock at $75 for a book. I bought the Interactive FR Map CD for only slightly more than that!

LaughingWizard -
You may want to pick up the second Unearthed Arcana (the 3.5 version one) - it has many alternate rules that can be used to approximate 2E systems (though, not fully 2E:S&P, but gestalt classes are rapidly weakening my reluctance to move to 3.5E. (Worlds may have heard that first, but... nice.)

THO -
Of course; who else would it be?
Arion Elenim Posted - 12 Jan 2005 : 22:49:00
LOL...

Now THAT is how you title a tome!

Methinks all of my threads from now on will be entitled "Voluptuous Elven Priestesses of Sune and the Bards Who Love Them!". Maybe folk will respond more often...
Kentinal Posted - 12 Jan 2005 : 16:53:09
quote:
Originally posted by LaughingWizard

Thanks for the info folks. I assume the SRD you refered to is on the WotC site, so I'll check it out. I haven't been there in a couple of months. The changes you mentioned seem...interesting. (Hey, do you just cut and past to get a quote into a new reply? Such as when you want to refer back to something someone else said?) Thanks again. Wiz.




Well yes the SRD is on WotC site, though available in zip form (you need to download it), however because it is open gaming there are a lot of html versions. You might try this site: http://www.systemreferencedocuments.org/35/theraven_stephenh/index.html
which appears to be comperhenive enough to study.

As for quoting, there is a button that you can select to quote text of a post. As you become more uused to the feature you can become more verisitile in how to quote others.

Oh to your question about importing the 1st Edition bard, that would tend to be hard to build in 3rd, however a stardard class in 3rd includes bards.

LaughingWizard Posted - 12 Jan 2005 : 15:25:23
Thanks for the info folks. I assume the SRD you refered to is on the WotC site, so I'll check it out. I haven't been there in a couple of months. The changes you mentioned seem...interesting. (Hey, do you just cut and past to get a quote into a new reply? Such as when you want to refer back to something someone else said?) Thanks again. Wiz.
Bookwyrm Posted - 12 Jan 2005 : 05:19:14
Actually, game rules cannot be protected by copyright law. If it has roleplay information (no matter how minor), it is copyrighted, but the rules themselves aren't.

What WotC did, though, was instead of frowning on the use of rules they developed, they actively encouraged it. Before, you could go buy a rulebook, copy out rules and nothing else, and not get in trouble (though you couldn't put in anything else, especially the brand logo, so you wouldn't make much money as a "cheap knockoff). Now, the rules are given away from the offical website itself, and the Open Gaming License further defines what is permited.

I suggest you go look them over yourself and decide if you want to upgrade. I think you should, but it's up to you. If you have questions about changes, feel free to ask.
Kentinal Posted - 11 Jan 2005 : 18:32:51
quote:
Originally posted by LaughingWizard

To get to my point, I like the way 2ndE runs and cleaned up some of the snafus in 1E. Is it worth my time and money to buy and convert to 3e or is it 3.5? Or should I play along in happy anachronistic fashion? By the by, are 3e materials easily converted back to 2e? Until Next, Wiz in the Northlands



Well, time and money are hard to judge, each person value that differently. 3.5 (do not bother with 3.0) does offer improvements over 2nd, Infravision is gone (which resulted in endless debates about how it should work) replaced with darkvision (better defined), MR is gone (which occasionally resulted in arguements) replaced with Spell Resistance (SR) and is better defined.
Dual-classing no longer exists at all, multiclass is handled differently and all races can multi-class.
There is one thing available for thrid Edition that was not for 2nd, some of the gaming information is open source (or at least near to that) by the release of the SRD (System Reference Document)which is free and widely accessible on the web. It does not offer all the gaming system but provides a lot of information as to the system. As an experienced player you should have little problem understanding and spoting changes.

As to if 3.x items can be converted back to 2nd I would say in most cases yes it should not be that hard to do.

The change to 3rd was more massive then the change to 2nd IMO. Each version further certainly can be found to have some flaws in it.
LaughingWizard Posted - 11 Jan 2005 : 18:14:51
Well Met Again!

One thing I should add. My group happily merged the best of 1 and 2e, since some things we like weren't in 2e, such as the Cavalier class, and such as the lack of the old Bard class (and the neat instruments!) I handle game balance issues created by these things as they come up on a case by case basis. Can this sort of thing be done in 3e? Thanks. Wiz.
LaughingWizard Posted - 11 Jan 2005 : 18:10:24
Well Met. The title of this thread DID catch my eye...But seriously, I'm in the same boat as many of you. I began playing AD&D when "White Plume Mountain" was still a fresh memory in most gamers' minds and Gary still owned TSR. (Whatever happened to him anyway?) Since our gang has moved apart and hold real jobs now, we only get one or two sessions in a year.

I bought all the 2ndE books and read them cover to cover, just after our campaign began in the 1stE realms. (Heck, I bought the old gray box new!) After 2ndE, we split up, hence I never got into 3e. To get to my point, I like the way 2ndE runs and cleaned up some of the snafus in 1E. Is it worth my time and money to buy and convert to 3e or is it 3.5? Or should I play along in happy anachronistic fashion? By the by, are 3e materials easily converted back to 2e? Until Next, Wiz in the Northlands
Purple Dragon Knight Posted - 10 Dec 2004 : 00:47:40
The price was indeed steep. I only picked it up to commemorate my decision to stick with 3.5 for the rest of my days.
Garen Thal Posted - 09 Dec 2004 : 20:49:04
Here in the States, I was able to pick up the book for $47.25 (that's AUD$62.52, and CDN$57.65, and £24.51) through Amazon.com. I'm sure that customs duties are being charged up the wazoo all over the place (Amazon.ca lists the price as CDN$74.20, Amazon.co.uk as £35.32).

There are a couple of problems I'm finding with the book: pages stick together because of the process used to add the silver to the edges; the layout cut off a tiny bit of the border art; and the sealing of the book in plastic has led to the seemingly permanent "hole" for the red cloth bookmark.

Still, the combination of a leather cover, cloth bookmark, shiny newness, and inclusion of errata makes me glad I picked the book up. I'm just not sure I'd have paid more than I did.
Purple Dragon Knight Posted - 09 Dec 2004 : 20:20:04
I got mine at $85 (Canadian dollars). Check it out at:
http://www.imaginaire.com/indexv2.jsp?url=/lib/panier/affproduitindexv2.jsp&in1_code=978078693432457500&cat1=GA&cat2s=117
(if this link does not work, try www.imaginaire.com and work your way to "D20 - DUNGEONS & DRAGONS: PLAYER'S HANDBOOK 3.5 SPECIAL EDITION (LEATHERBOUND)" )

It contains all the erratas and changes brought to the PHB since the first printing of 3.5: it is the most "current" PHB so far (if you have the first 3.5 printing, you need to download the erratas from the WotC website)
SiriusBlack Posted - 09 Dec 2004 : 15:20:02
quote:
Originally posted by Dargoth

I almost had a stroke today when I saw how much the Leather bound PHB was



This time of year, someone would have simply grabbed your credit card out of your hand/pocket and people would have kept stepping over your body.

quote:

120 bucks!!!!!



I've spent that much before on a single gaming item. But, only once.

quote:

That is one WOTC book that I can happily do without, now if they did a Leather bound FRC for the FRs 20th birthday...........



Possibly, I'd want to know more details. If it's simply leather bound, with nothing new, forget it.
Wooly Rupert Posted - 09 Dec 2004 : 11:18:56
quote:
Originally posted by Dargoth

I almost had a stroke today when I saw how much the Leather bound PHB was

120 bucks!!!!!

That is one WOTC book that I can happily do without, now if they did a Leather bound FRC for the FRs 20th birthday...........



Yeah, ditto that! I want it, but not that badly.
Dargoth Posted - 09 Dec 2004 : 08:50:54
I almost had a stroke today when I saw how much the Leather bound PHB was

120 bucks!!!!!

That is one WOTC book that I can happily do without, now if they did a Leather bound FRC for the FRs 20th birthday...........
Purple Dragon Knight Posted - 09 Dec 2004 : 08:43:17
Indeed: as a mechanical engineer, I can attest that ventilation is required when leather is involved. Always.
Xysma Posted - 08 Dec 2004 : 14:12:34
I bought the leather-bound version, and I love it. I probably won't use it, but I just had to buy it. I mean come on, what's isn't better with a little black leather?
Wooly Rupert Posted - 07 Dec 2004 : 05:18:39
quote:
Originally posted by The Hooded One

Ahem, gentlesirs, I hear my name being taken.
(However, as long as you’re taking me, ’tis never in vain.)
PDK, the title of this thread does apply to an item of apparel I happen to own. Mine, however, is ventilated in two strategic places . . . . . . which inspired Ed to use it for a certain priestess of Loviatar in this year’s forthcoming Spin A Yarn tale. You see, he somehow had to work in “a potion that through wild magic gives someone green nipples” (suggested by a seminar audience member at GenCon Indy this year ), and I’m afraid I, ah, “leaped” to mind.
About the luxury PHB: yes, a nice tome, but I agree with Lord Rad about the lack of embossing or gravure. I’ll have to caresXX er, handle it very gently . . .
THO




Ah, so I was right to think of you when I saw this thread... And why am I not surprised that you have such a piece of attire? It makes me wonder what other interesting clothing you might have...
The Hooded One Posted - 07 Dec 2004 : 04:01:55
Ahem, gentlesirs, I hear my name being taken.
(However, as long as you’re taking me, ’tis never in vain.)
PDK, the title of this thread does apply to an item of apparel I happen to own. Mine, however, is ventilated in two strategic places . . . . . . which inspired Ed to use it for a certain priestess of Loviatar in this year’s forthcoming Spin A Yarn tale. You see, he somehow had to work in “a potion that through wild magic gives someone green nipples” (suggested by a seminar audience member at GenCon Indy this year ), and I’m afraid I, ah, “leaped” to mind.
About the luxury PHB: yes, a nice tome, but I agree with Lord Rad about the lack of embossing or gravure. I’ll have to caresXX er, handle it very gently . . .
THO
Purple Dragon Knight Posted - 07 Dec 2004 : 03:29:42
hmmm... that sounds like a good policy Lord Rad: only FR from now on. However, I fear that if I buy the 4E FRCS, I'll be tempted to buy the 4E PHB, and so on and so on... falling in the same trap again.

I'll have to apply discipline to limit myself to FR stuff... and think back of my leather PHB to keep me on track!!!
Wooly Rupert Posted - 04 Dec 2004 : 11:28:59
quote:
Originally posted by Lord Rad

I'm actually in the same boat, PDK. I have all AD&D 2nd ed material and all 3/3.5 material to date. I'm not big fan of crunch and a lot of what I buy is due to completeness and some strange underlying loyalty I have for D&D.

The most used products I have are obviously my FR products, which I read for the fluff alone. I feel that I have no need for any future editions of D&D as 3.5 will work perfectly well as it is and I have all the material I need to actual run with the mechanics of the game. Of course, i'll buy any future FR material, regardless of the rules edition, as it is the fluff I am interested in.



And that sums it up for me, too.
Lord Rad Posted - 04 Dec 2004 : 10:50:51
I'm actually in the same boat, PDK. I have all AD&D 2nd ed material and all 3/3.5 material to date. I'm not big fan of crunch and a lot of what I buy is due to completeness and some strange underlying loyalty I have for D&D.

The most used products I have are obviously my FR products, which I read for the fluff alone. I feel that I have no need for any future editions of D&D as 3.5 will work perfectly well as it is and I have all the material I need to actual run with the mechanics of the game. Of course, i'll buy any future FR material, regardless of the rules edition, as it is the fluff I am interested in.
Purple Dragon Knight Posted - 03 Dec 2004 : 20:49:30
To be 100% honest with you Lord Rad, I only bought it because 3.5 is my last edition... all my friends from my original group are not playing anymore: I'm the last survivor from a golden high school D&D era. I now scavenge a game or two here and there, like a gypsie looking for a crowd to perform to... so, I predict that most of the gaming I'll be doing in the future will be DMed by me (so I'll be free to decide which edition we play: 3.5 in my case, as I find it quite balanced and enjoyable)

In short, this sucker has already spent enough money through AD&D, 2nd edition and 3E to even think of moving to 4th or 5th, especially considering the small amount of gaming I do these days. Come to think of it, 9 books out of 10 I've been buying since 2000 was out of gaming nostalgia or desire to read about FR rather than actual gaming need. Enough is enough. I haven't even read half the FR books I've bought so far... time to take a break off the whole thing (or at least read what I have first...)

Sigh...
Lord Rad Posted - 03 Dec 2004 : 20:33:21
quote:
Originally posted by Purple Dragon Knight

Well, I look at it this way: this PHB will last me a LONG time... all the previous ones have cracked in the middle. This one should be more durable thanks to the leather holding it all together!



I'm sure it will, but before the cracks ever begin.... we'll be on D&D v5.5

I was really looking forward to this one, but as I said, the silver printing on the cover just didn't sell it enough for me
Purple Dragon Knight Posted - 03 Dec 2004 : 19:56:48
Well, I look at it this way: this PHB will last me a LONG time... all the previous ones have cracked in the middle. This one should be more durable thanks to the leather holding it all together!

Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000