| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Alaundo |
Posted - 14 Apr 2005 : 09:28:42
Well met
Unfortunately, Candlekeep was unavailable from 13th April at 23:30GMT until approximately 14th April 09:00GMT. The reason for this is not yet known but investigations are underway.
Apologies for any inconvenience. |
| 22 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| The Sage |
Posted - 16 Apr 2005 : 04:53:14
quote:
Originally posted by Rhezarnos
What kind of problems? No wonder people are mooving to Linux...
Don't get me started...
I've had the opportunity to see the core components of the Windows APL. With the amount of loopholes still within the framework, I'm surprised security violations don't happen more often.
|
| Alaundo |
Posted - 15 Apr 2005 : 20:39:04
quote:
Originally posted by kuje31
[brThis seemed to have effected other places as well. The mods over on the boards that must not be named believe this was also what was causing them problems in the last few days. :)
Well met
Hmmmm, that's very interesting. Thank ye for bringing this information over, kuje.  I'd be interested to hear any follow up on this matter and how widely this "fix" caused problems. |
| Kuje |
Posted - 15 Apr 2005 : 17:48:37
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly RupertI thought it was the users that caused their problems.  
That to. :) Me more then most, it seems. hahaha |
| Wooly Rupert |
Posted - 15 Apr 2005 : 17:25:35
quote:
Originally posted by kuje31
quote:
Originally posted by Alaundo
Well met
Not wishing to let the matter lie, I persisted to get a valid explanation... my efforts paid off... the server downtime was due to problems following implementation of the latest security patches from Microsoft.
All is well now, and appears back to full speed also
This seemed to have effected other places as well. The mods over on the boards that must not be named believe this was also what was causing them problems in the last few days. :)
I thought it was the users that caused their problems. |
| Kuje |
Posted - 15 Apr 2005 : 17:02:17
quote:
Originally posted by Alaundo
Well met
Not wishing to let the matter lie, I persisted to get a valid explanation... my efforts paid off... the server downtime was due to problems following implementation of the latest security patches from Microsoft.
All is well now, and appears back to full speed also
This seemed to have effected other places as well. The mods over on the boards that must not be named believe this was also what was causing them problems in the last few days. :) |
| SiriusBlack |
Posted - 15 Apr 2005 : 14:41:52
quote:
Originally posted by Alaundo
Not wishing to let the matter lie, I persisted to get a valid explanation... my efforts paid off... the server downtime was due to problems following implementation of the latest security patches from Microsoft.
I believe we have a new candidate for "Worst Threat to Faerun." |
| khorne |
Posted - 15 Apr 2005 : 10:04:12
Just tell me who was responsible and I wíll harvest their heads for Khorne."Skulls for the skull throne! Blood for the blood god!" |
| Rhezarnos |
Posted - 15 Apr 2005 : 09:12:08
What kind of problems? No wonder people are mooving to Linux... |
| Alaundo |
Posted - 15 Apr 2005 : 08:45:12
Well met
Not wishing to let the matter lie, I persisted to get a valid explanation... my efforts paid off... the server downtime was due to problems following implementation of the latest security patches from Microsoft.
All is well now, and appears back to full speed also |
| Rhezarnos |
Posted - 15 Apr 2005 : 06:54:34
quote:
Originally posted by Dargoth
quote:
Originally posted by Kajehase
quote:
Originally posted by Dargoth
I seem to recall in 1ed there where Worm like creatures that used to eat books. Perhaps Candlekeep has an infestation? 
Bookworms?
From memory I thought they had a more exotic name
Tomeworms? |
| Dargoth |
Posted - 15 Apr 2005 : 06:15:31
quote:
Originally posted by Kajehase
quote:
Originally posted by Dargoth
I seem to recall in 1ed there where Worm like creatures that used to eat books. Perhaps Candlekeep has an infestation?
Bookworms?
From memory I thought they had a more exotic name |
| Kajehase |
Posted - 15 Apr 2005 : 05:41:54
quote:
Originally posted by Dargoth
I seem to recall in 1ed there where Worm like creatures that used to eat books. Perhaps Candlekeep has an infestation?
Bookworms? |
| Dargoth |
Posted - 15 Apr 2005 : 00:36:16
quote:
Originally posted by George Krashos
It was a tad disturbing to be unable to access the site - you'll have to clean out the library of all those pesky jermlaine.
-- George Krashos
I seem to recall in 1ed there where Worm like creatures that used to eat books. Perhaps Candlekeep has an infestation?
Ah well the down gave me the time to begin writing up Jhaamdaths "Political history" and an Initate of Auppenser Feat |
| SiriusBlack |
Posted - 14 Apr 2005 : 20:31:50
quote:
Originally posted by Alaundo
Oddly, Candlekeep became active again at around 09:00, afterwhich, at 09:30 I received a support response that no problems were found 
Still, such a response was partially expected 
Ah customer support...an oxymoron in and of itself. Hang in there Alaundo. No one blames you. Well one or two scribes do, but I'm sure they are just kidding. |
| Alaundo |
Posted - 14 Apr 2005 : 17:33:53
Well met
An update...or not
Oddly, Candlekeep became active again at around 09:00, afterwhich, at 09:30 I received a support response that no problems were found
Still, such a response was partially expected |
| George Krashos |
Posted - 14 Apr 2005 : 14:11:47
It was a tad disturbing to be unable to access the site - you'll have to clean out the library of all those pesky jermlaine.
-- George Krashos
|
| Alaundo |
Posted - 14 Apr 2005 : 12:33:30
quote:
Originally posted by SiriusBlack
As for the reason...the last WOTSQ novel in which Lolth returns comes out, Candlekeep suffers a period of darkness.
You do the math Faerun folk.
SB
 Aye, I must put extra wards on those underdark passages and planar portals
All appears to be up and running again now, albeit a little slow (although this may just be from my connection). I'll provide an update as to the cause later today, hopefully. |
| LordAnki |
Posted - 14 Apr 2005 : 11:57:26
Meh it was okay. I wanted to get on but I was like whatever. We'll just go for a walk. |
| Wooly Rupert |
Posted - 14 Apr 2005 : 11:29:54
I just want to say that I was in no way responsible. |
| SiriusBlack |
Posted - 14 Apr 2005 : 11:29:41
quote:
Originally posted by Alaundo
Well met
Unfortunately, Candlekeep was unavailable from 13th April at 23:30GMT until approximately 14th April 09:00GMT. The reason for this is not yet known but investigations are underway.
Apologies for any inconvenience.
Considering how this is a non-corporate site that is more reliable than the vast majority of company sites of a similar nature, I don't think you have anything to apologize for.
As for the reason...the last WOTSQ novel in which Lolth returns comes out, Candlekeep suffers a period of darkness.
You do the math Faerun folk.
SB |
| Shadovar |
Posted - 14 Apr 2005 : 10:20:25
I pray that such incidents won't happen again as it well....sort of an inconvenience to me when I can't acess. By the way, can I inquire how is the investigations going? |
| The Sage |
Posted - 14 Apr 2005 : 09:43:38
All is now well then?
|
