Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 Running the Realms
 Backstabbing

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]
Rolling Eyes [8|] Confused [?!:] Help [?:] King [3|:]
Laughing [:OD] What [W] Oooohh [:H] Down [:E]

  Check here to include your profile signature.
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Echon Posted - 09 Dec 2002 : 21:09:32
I have been unsuccesful in the attempt to find any rules about weapons suitable for backstabbing. So far I have looked in Player's Handbook, Dungeon Master's Guide and The Complete Thief's Handbook.

Currently I have allowed thieves the usage of knives, daggers and short swords. In Baldur's Gate it was possible to backstab with long swords, scimitars and katanas as well but they may have made that up.

What do the official rules say?

-Echon
13   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Echon Posted - 25 Jan 2003 : 12:50:21
(2nd Edition)

Player's Handbook claims that the bonus for a rear attack when backstabbing is +4 while Dungeon Master's Guide says only +2. Which is true?

-Echon
Kitira Gildragon Posted - 20 Dec 2002 : 12:50:08
Hmmm. You pose a good question. Were I a DM, I think I would limit the use of backstabbing weapons to small weapons including the short sword. I used the Sword +3 of backstabbing (can't remember if it was a short or long sword...HELP!) and dagger of venom with my theif. <Talk about heaven...>
As for the backstabbing, I believe it's just that. Not an unguarded attack [ie. slash], but a physical STAB.
Just my 2cp
Artalis Posted - 19 Dec 2002 : 22:25:45
In my opinion Backstabbing is based on the knowledge of anatomy. Specifically where one can do the most damage with an attack against an unaware opponent. Therefore I allow any weapon that can be brought to bear stealthily to be used. (no flails since the chain makes noise and so on...)

A hammer can be used a the base of the skull or the temple, a blade of any kind between the ribs and shoulder blades and so on. It's all about knowing your opponents physiology.

With that in mind I don't allow backstab attacks with damage multipliers against non-humaniod opponents whom the backstabber doesn't know the physiology of like a dragon for a thief who hasn't studied or fought one before.
Ghost Posted - 11 Dec 2002 : 18:44:26
quote:
Originally posted by Frey

I stab with anything. A nail will do and an arrow will do better. Just be creative and imagine a picture of the action. knitting-needles, letter openers, ballpoints, loads of agricultural tools.

But what is a ballpoint?

When in doubt, consult your DM



An arrow is not really a good choice. If you hold onto the shaft of the arrow close to the point, it will not penetrate very far. If you place your hand further from the point, the shaft of the arrow may snap, instead of entering the body. Better to use a bolt in such cases..
Ghost Posted - 11 Dec 2002 : 18:40:01
In 3e you can also 'sneak attack' with a ranged weapon, within a certain range (standard range is 30 ft).
In 2e, I would suggest that you can 'backstab' with any melee weapon from the thief weapon list. This includes the long sword (for medium characters), but excludes the 2-handed sword.
Mumadar Ibn Huzal Posted - 11 Dec 2002 : 09:01:29
That's not really a 3e rule. Actually the term backstabbing as an attack no longer exists in 3e. It is now called a sneak attack, and can be used with any melee weapon, provided the circumstances are there and the character in question does have the ability to make a sneak attack.

For second edition, I could imagine ruling more or less the same, any melee weapon goes. But the speedfactor of the weapon could serve as a penalty, making a two-handed sword a lot less likely to be used in a backstab attack...
Echon Posted - 11 Dec 2002 : 08:41:17
quote:
Originally posted by Cherrn

How about any weapon that can be used in 1 hand without special training ?(Leaves bastard sword out) Thats the formula i always used with regards to backstabbin'.



I suppose that rule is a 3E thingy?

-Echon
Echon Posted - 11 Dec 2002 : 08:39:03
quote:
Originally posted by Frey
When in doubt, consult your DM


The problem is that I am the DM. Who do DMs go to consult?

-Echon
Cherrn Posted - 11 Dec 2002 : 03:16:39
How about any weapon that can be used in 1 hand without special training ?(Leaves bastard sword out) Thats the formula i always used with regards to backstabbin'.
Frey Posted - 10 Dec 2002 : 23:08:49
quote:
Originally posted by Frey
When in doubt, consult your DM

Sorry, forgot where I was
Frey Posted - 10 Dec 2002 : 23:04:38
I stab with anything. A nail will do and an arrow will do better. Just be creative and imagine a picture of the action. knitting-needles, letter openers, ballpoints, loads of agricultural tools.

But what is a ballpoint?

When in doubt, consult your DM
Echon Posted - 09 Dec 2002 : 21:25:55
quote:
Originally posted by Rad

I havent seen anything official but I suppose I always imagined it to be a SMALL weapon such as a dagger as it can be gripped and wielded close to the opponents body. Saying that, a Short Sword is classed as a size S but has more of a sweeping attack rather than a lunge and stabbing action. It depends if you look at it practically or just as a rule mechanic.


The damage type of a short sword is piercing and not slashing which indicates a thrust and not a swing. Still, it is a matter of preference.

quote:
Then again, (im probably not helping here with my post ), backstabbing doesnt necessarily mean backSTABBING, merely a rear undetected attack using stealth, in which case a long sword as you mention would be perfectly acceptable.


Absolutely true. However, a problem arises if allowing a long sword because then some player is going to argue that a broad sword could be used and then a two-handed sword etc.

Regarding the backstabbing, using a blunt weapon such a club might knock a person unconscious.

quote:
Personally im going to stick to only allowing small weapons that dont require a swinging action (i.e. daggers!)


I was considering allowing a spear, the small, one-handed type. Then again, perhaps I should not. Things could easily get out of control.

-Echon
Lord Rad Posted - 09 Dec 2002 : 21:15:22
I havent seen anything official but I suppose I always imagined it to be a SMALL weapon such as a dagger as it can be gripped and wielded close to the opponents body. Saying that, a Short Sword is classed as a size S but has more of a sweeping attack rather than a lunge and stabbing action. It depends if you look at it practically or just as a rule mechanic.

Then again, (im probably not helping here with my post ), backstabbing doesnt necessarily mean backSTABBING, merely a rear undetected attack using stealth, in which case a long sword as you mention would be perfectly acceptable.

Personally im going to stick to only allowing small weapons that dont require a swinging action (i.e. daggers!)

Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000