Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Realmslore
 RPG News & Releases
 Revision Spotlight - 3.5

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]
Rolling Eyes [8|] Confused [?!:] Help [?:] King [3|:]
Laughing [:OD] What [W] Oooohh [:H] Down [:E]

  Check here to include your profile signature.
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
The Sage Posted - 29 May 2003 : 13:49:35
I am basically starting this scroll to discover whether anybody has made any use of the 'Revision Spotlight' material posted on the WotC every week, in their FR campaigns.

Also what are your generally feelings about the revision topics previewed so far?.



14   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
The Sage Posted - 16 Jul 2003 : 08:07:04
I know I remember it. It inspired me to try a similar idea on the WotC D&D forums. Obviously nothing became of it.



Bookwyrm Posted - 16 Jul 2003 : 03:40:21
I once made that very same suggestion. Alaundo didn't think it would do any good, though.
The Sage Posted - 16 Jul 2003 : 02:52:52
Maybe the collected sages and scribes here at Candlekeep should draft a petition for We Who Wish to See More Fluff in WotC Gaming Material.



Bookwyrm Posted - 16 Jul 2003 : 01:12:08
Maybe that will show the Powers That Are over at Wizards that gamers aren't impressed just by a bunch of fancy rules, that we demand more fluffy goodness . . .

. . .

Nah, too much to expect of them.
The Sage Posted - 15 Jul 2003 : 17:48:59
Actually I have been quite surprised with the gamer reaction towards the revision on the WotC forums. The negative feeling towards the revision seems to be increasing as the core rulebooks are released.

Interesting.

zemd Posted - 15 Jul 2003 : 15:17:13
I already read it Sage. I should have written " IMO they don't know what to put in this section anymore"
... that's phrase seems strange, but i don't know how to correct it
The Sage Posted - 10 Jul 2003 : 10:56:09
You have to use the archive in the Spotlight column zemd, to go back and look over the past revised material that WotC has posted to the site.

The 'Table of Contents' previews are just the latest postings.

zemd Posted - 10 Jul 2003 : 10:13:41
IMO they don't know what to put in this section, that's why they give us the table of contents. which are completly useless
The Sage Posted - 31 May 2003 : 08:17:08
You're right.

I guess it's just part of WotC's perverse "We'll-try-to-irritate-and-annoy-as-many-D&D-fans-as-we-can" policy.



May your learning be free and unfettered

Lord Rad Posted - 30 May 2003 : 16:45:27
quote:
Originally posted by Sage of Perth

WOW , thanks for the insight Rad. I think I may now do the same as well.

May your learning be free and unfettered







Yeah, why they dont just release it all at the same time, I dunno. They will obviously sell both releases as more PHB's are bound to be sold, and some DMs will also get the MM, some wont. But those fanatics will want all three core rulebooks so will likely buy the gift set! Why delay it?!
The Sage Posted - 30 May 2003 : 09:06:25
WOW , thanks for the insight Rad. I think I may now do the same as well.

May your learning be free and unfettered



Lord Rad Posted - 30 May 2003 : 08:59:24
quote:
Originally posted by Sage of Perth

Just out of curiosity, who here will be purchasing the new revised core-rulebooks?.


Yup, definately.... although I WONT be buying them in June\July as WotC are releasing them as a gift set in a cardboard sleeve in September
The Sage Posted - 30 May 2003 : 07:50:59
I have actually found the last few quite interesting. The latest one, I think it is the latest one, about the revision to the gnome stats, I actually found quite useful when I was reworking my 'Tinkerer' gnome stats. The ones before that, had some revised fiends I believe, but I haven't used these in a campaign yet, because I am still waiting for my copy of Fiend Folio.

The Dragon magazine articles I find, are the best sources though. I am actually starting to feel, that there might be a 'little' (and I did say a 'little') bit of a justification for the revised material.

Just out of curiosity, who here will be purchasing the new revised core-rulebooks?.



May your learning be free and unfettered

Lord Rad Posted - 29 May 2003 : 14:01:59
I havent actually read any of the articles yet, nor the ones which appear in Dragon Magazine, but I intend to. Are they worthwhile? I had a quick glance at the one in Dragon this month as it intrigued me with talk of changes to the Barbarian and Ranger classes.

Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000