Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Products
 Forgotten Realms Book Club
 Scream of Stone: Chapters 61 - 70
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Alaundo
Head Moderator
Admin

United Kingdom
5696 Posts

Posted - 29 Jun 2007 :  19:54:14  Show Profile  Visit Alaundo's Homepage Send Alaundo a Private Message  Reply with Quote  Delete Topic
Well met

This is a Book Club thread for Scream of Stone (Book 3 of The Watercourse trilogy), by Philip Athans. Please discuss the chapters 61 - 70 herein.

Alaundo
Candlekeep Forums Head Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct


An Introduction to Candlekeep - by Ed Greenwood
The Candlekeep Compendium - Tomes of Realmslore penned by Scribes of Candlekeep

KnightErrantJR
Great Reader

USA
5402 Posts

Posted - 04 Oct 2007 :  03:29:47  Show Profile  Visit KnightErrantJR's Homepage Send KnightErrantJR a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I kind of felt like this section went in circles for a while. Pristoleph talks to Wenefir and Wenefir tells him to step down. Pristoleph says he won't kill him if he gets out. The senators send Wenefir to talk to Pristoleph, he tells him to step down, Pristoleph tells him he won't kill him if he gets out . . .

I'm also having a hard time figuring out why its so hard for Marek to kill Ivar. Perhaps I'm off a bit here, but Ivar doesn't carry magic around with him or anything . . . couldn't Marek scry him, teleport in range, fry him with a spell from a distance, and then teleport home?

This part just feels like its kind of artificially building things up before the conclusion.

To be honest, Phil Athans can write really creepy, he can come up with really vivid scenes, and write really interesting characters, and the passage of time and its portraying is really a fun thing to watch, but I feel like the threads aren't really coming together to a real resolution, but that its kind of being forced into resolution mode nonetheless. I could be wrong, it just feels like the closer to the end we get, the more things are happening not because they are progressing the logical way based on previous events, but because they just are.

Also, I know I'm in hypersensitive mode about the setting right now, but somehow Pristoleph's speech about how all things pass on and eventually end almost felt like a comment on the current "era" of the Realms. But I know I'm preoccupied.

One last thing that occurs to me. I get that Pristoleph respects Ivar, but the comparison to Karsus seemed a bit much. Maybe its because one of the things I like about the setting is that while some things are more or less common, rarely is there a "never" or "always" applied to the setting, but it feels like there has "never" been a genius like Ivar. No one that hasn't used magic has done something amazing with engineering alone before in Faerun? Even among the dwarves, for example?

Go to Top of Page

Rinonalyrna Fathomlin
Great Reader

USA
7106 Posts

Posted - 06 Oct 2007 :  04:12:43  Show Profile  Visit Rinonalyrna Fathomlin's Homepage Send Rinonalyrna Fathomlin a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by KnightErrantJR

I'm also having a hard time figuring out why its so hard for Marek to kill Ivar. Perhaps I'm off a bit here, but Ivar doesn't carry magic around with him or anything . . . couldn't Marek scry him, teleport in range, fry him with a spell from a distance, and then teleport home?


Marek can't kill Ivar because Ivar is SPESHUL.

quote:
This part just feels like its kind of artificially building things up before the conclusion.

To be honest, Phil Athans can write really creepy, he can come up with really vivid scenes, and write really interesting characters, and the passage of time and its portraying is really a fun thing to watch, but I feel like the threads aren't really coming together to a real resolution, but that its kind of being forced into resolution mode nonetheless. I could be wrong, it just feels like the closer to the end we get, the more things are happening not because they are progressing the logical way based on previous events, but because they just are.


I agree with this. The way many plot threads in this books are tied up make no sense, or are anti-climatic.

quote:
Also, I know I'm in hypersensitive mode about the setting right now, but somehow Pristoleph's speech about how all things pass on and eventually end almost felt like a comment on the current "era" of the Realms. But I know I'm preoccupied.


I didn't like that speech because it felt like Pristoleph was acting as a pure conduit for the author's philosophy. He goes so far as to say that everything worth doing is done for and by one man. Now I'm very strongly an individualist, but even I think that statement is nonsense. I wouldn't go so far as to say that anything done for the benefit of others isn't worth doing, which seems to be the idea here. And how does it mesh with the Realms, and D&D in general, which has always had a strong vibe of going out of one's way to help others? What about all the accomplishments that have been made in the Realms itself with the intention of helping many people?

quote:
One last thing that occurs to me. I get that Pristoleph respects Ivar, but the comparison to Karsus seemed a bit much. Maybe its because one of the things I like about the setting is that while some things are more or less common, rarely is there a "never" or "always" applied to the setting, but it feels like there has "never" been a genius like Ivar. No one that hasn't used magic has done something amazing with engineering alone before in Faerun? Even among the dwarves, for example?


No. Truly, there has never been a genius like Ivar. And nothing that has ever been done in the Realms is as great, wonderful, and perfect as his canal.


"Instead of asking why we sleep, it might make sense to ask why we wake. Perchance we live to dream. From that perspective, the sea of troubles we navigate in the workaday world might be the price we pay for admission to another night in the world of dreams."
--Richard Greene (letter to Time)

Edited by - Rinonalyrna Fathomlin on 06 Oct 2007 04:13:49
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2025 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000