Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Journals
 Running the Realms
 Feat - Holy Warrior
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

The Sage
Procrastinator Most High

Australia
31772 Posts

Posted - 04 May 2003 :  13:05:35  Show Profile Send The Sage a Private Message  Reply with Quote  Delete Topic
Greetings,

For my upcoming Evermeet campaign, my friend and I have been tinkering with some feats we've picked up from other books, attempting to make them Realms related.

One such feat was suggested for the paladins in the party who would soon be adventuring in Evermeet.

It was designed by both my friend and myself, however before making it available for the paladins in the campaign, we would like some feedback. Here it is -

Holy Warrior [General]

Prerequisite: 2+ ranks in Knowledge (religion). Weapon Specialization, ability to Smite Evil. Must be a member of a religious order serving a Lawful aligned deity.

Benefit: You gain a +2 to all attack and damage rolls against all clerics that worship Evil-aligned deities.



What do you think, I appreciate all criticism and I understand also that it may need major work.

Good learning...



- The Sage of Perth: For all your Realms lore needs


Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)

"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood

Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage

zemd
Master of Realmslore

France
1103 Posts

Posted - 04 May 2003 :  13:34:13  Show Profile Send zemd a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Ouch! Too powerful IMO!!!
The prerequestite should be much higher and the benefit should be restricted to once or twice a day, or something like that
Go to Top of Page

branmakmuffin
Senior Scribe

USA
428 Posts

Posted - 04 May 2003 :  17:04:27  Show Profile  Visit branmakmuffin's Homepage Send branmakmuffin a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Why is lawful getting bonuses vs. evil?

Unlike zemd, it doesn't seem too powerful to me. It works only versus a small segment of a PC's potential enemies. Does the PC have to know the opponent is an evil cleric?

However, there is already a feat called Heretic's Bane. Here is its adaptation for Icewind Dale II:

Heretic's Bane, pre-req, Divine Spells BAB +4: Allows the character to gain a +1 bonus to hit and damage against clerics and druids.

I think the orginal source says "against druids and clerics of a different alignment" or something like that.

Edited by - branmakmuffin on 05 May 2003 05:06:18
Go to Top of Page

Cult_Leader
Learned Scribe

USA
337 Posts

Posted - 04 May 2003 :  18:57:09  Show Profile  Visit Cult_Leader's Homepage Send Cult_Leader a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I just have this to say. Paladins are already strong enough. Do not make them stronger. When they quest for their Holy , or unholy in some cases, sword, and their horse... they get all that xp for themselves BECSE THEY HAVE TO DO IT BY THEMSELVES. Fight two trolls after you get your holoy sword by yourself when your level 6 and you get what? Something like 900 xp? Not only that but Paladins already get some powerful feats from one of the D&D side books for clerics and paladins. They get cha mods to saves as well ... and damn near imune to fear.... poisons and diseases of both normal and magical nature.... You DONT need to make them stronger .... trust me.

"Madness you say! Do you fear me? Are you afraid of what I might do, of what I might say? What a fascinating reaction. Don't you find it somewhat encumbering?"

Piddles assumes a deep and resonant voice. "Space...the Final Frontier. These are the voyages of the starship...Garou. It's mission: to slay Wyrm creatures where they live and breed. To accumulate more Garou than the world's entire population. To produce metis like no one has before." - Piddles

"Aren't you people supposed to be doing something? Like, entertaining me, the fascist wizard?" - InleRah

I have the passwords to the minds of everyone and the cheat codes to the universe - Me
Go to Top of Page

Mournblade
Master of Realmslore

USA
1287 Posts

Posted - 05 May 2003 :  04:35:29  Show Profile Send Mournblade a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by zemd

Ouch! Too powerful IMO!!!
The prerequestite should be much higher and the benefit should be restricted to once or twice a day, or something like that



Zemd I thought this was quite a balanced feat. But a requisite should not be servitude to a LAWFUL DEITY.

The IWDII Feat is a little too general and well computer oriented. I think Bookwyrms might work better for the tabletop balance.


A wizard is Never late Frodo Baggins. Nor is he Early. A wizard arrives precisely when he means to...
Go to Top of Page

branmakmuffin
Senior Scribe

USA
428 Posts

Posted - 05 May 2003 :  05:14:42  Show Profile  Visit branmakmuffin's Homepage Send branmakmuffin a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Hm, I don't seem to be able to find a source other than IwD II for Heretic's Bane. I could've sworn I saw that it came from a PnP source book.

But it seems like an OK PnP feat to me with the "of different alignment" thrown in.

The Holy Warrior feat favors Good characters. There should be an Unholy Warrior feat as well.

zemd, the Weapon Focus feat gives a character +1 to hit everybody. A feat that gives +2/+2 versus characters only of a certain class and alignment does not seem all that powerful to me.
Go to Top of Page

The Sage
Procrastinator Most High

Australia
31772 Posts

Posted - 05 May 2003 :  07:32:24  Show Profile Send The Sage a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Greetings,

branmakmuffin said -
quote:
Does the PC have to know the opponent is an evil cleric?
Yes. The clerics must be recognised as servants of evil-aligned deities.

and,
quote:
There should be an Unholy Warrior feat as well.

I am currently working on it.

Thanks all...

Good learning...



- The Sage of Perth: For all your Realms lore needs


Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)

"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood

Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage
Go to Top of Page

branmakmuffin
Senior Scribe

USA
428 Posts

Posted - 05 May 2003 :  17:39:25  Show Profile  Visit branmakmuffin's Homepage Send branmakmuffin a Private Message  Reply with Quote
More of my two tin pieces' worth.

Sage, what's wrong with just inversing Holy Warrior:

Unoly Warrior [General]

Prerequisite: 2+ ranks in Knowledge (religion). Weapon Specialization, ability to Smite Good. Must be a member of a religious order serving an Evil aligned deity.
Benefit: You gain a +2 to all attack and damage rolls against all clerics (what about druids?) that worship Good-aligned deities.

Of course, of the core 3E classes and prestige classes, I think only blackguards get Smite Good, and by the time a PC is a blackguard, +2/+2 might not be much of a bonus. Maybe sub "Ability to cast 2nd level divine spells" in place of being able to Smite, so an evil fighter/cleric could get it at a realtively low level where it'd do some good.

Edited by - branmakmuffin on 05 May 2003 17:40:31
Go to Top of Page

Mournblade
Master of Realmslore

USA
1287 Posts

Posted - 05 May 2003 :  19:43:35  Show Profile Send Mournblade a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I think whether or not the PC has to know his opponent is evil, depends on what the DM's interpretation of alignment is in the campaign. For my campaign it would work regardless, but I might not TELL the pc he is getting the bonus.


A wizard is Never late Frodo Baggins. Nor is he Early. A wizard arrives precisely when he means to...
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000