Author |
Topic |
|
Bocklin
Learned Scribe
Germany
151 Posts |
Posted - 03 Apr 2006 : 11:38:56
|
Hi,
I discovered these critters (i.e. the Ixitxachitl) in Queen of the Depths and I was wondering if they had been covered at all in 3.0 or 3.5? Are they somewhere to be found in a source book?
Otherwise, which 2nd Edition SB would be a good source for more fluff on them?
In advance, thanks a lot for your help!
Bocklin
|
|
Kajehase
Great Reader
Sweden
2104 Posts |
Posted - 03 Apr 2006 : 12:32:27
|
The most likely source for fluff would be Sea of Fallen Stars |
There is a rumour going around that I have found god. I think is unlikely because I have enough difficulty finding my keys, and there is empirical evidence that they exist. Terry Pratchett |
|
|
Arivia
Great Reader
Canada
2965 Posts |
Posted - 03 Apr 2006 : 13:06:14
|
Ixitxachitl are in the 3e MMII. |
|
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
Australia
31774 Posts |
Posted - 03 Apr 2006 : 13:54:45
|
quote: Originally posted by Kajehase
The most likely source for fluff would be Sea of Fallen Stars
Sea of Fallen Stars is pretty much the only full 2e source on the Ixitxachitl.
|
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)
"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood
Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage |
|
|
Bocklin
Learned Scribe
Germany
151 Posts |
Posted - 03 Apr 2006 : 14:00:20
|
Ok, thanks to you all!
A pity I don't owe MMII. I seem to remember that I had bought a download of SoFS from some website. Will have to dig that one out.
Bocklin |
|
|
Faraer
Great Reader
3308 Posts |
Posted - 03 Apr 2006 : 18:17:14
|
See Drizzt Do'Urden's Guide to the Underdark too. |
|
|
Arivia
Great Reader
Canada
2965 Posts |
Posted - 03 Apr 2006 : 20:31:34
|
quote: Originally posted by Faraer
See Drizzt Do'Urden's Guide to the Underdark too.
Aren't only ixzan featured in that tome, not ixitxachitl? |
|
|
Faraer
Great Reader
3308 Posts |
Posted - 03 Apr 2006 : 21:13:42
|
Ixzan mainly, but ixitxachitl are touched on. |
|
|
George Krashos
Master of Realmslore
Australia
6666 Posts |
Posted - 04 Apr 2006 : 00:45:04
|
And of course you can always dig up Ed's "Ecology of the Ixitxachitl" article, back in Dragon #85.
-- George Krashos
|
"Because only we, contrary to the barbarians, never count the enemy in battle." -- Aeschylus |
Edited by - George Krashos on 04 Apr 2006 08:03:13 |
|
|
|
Topic |
|