Author |
Topic |
|
Lord Rad
Great Reader
United Kingdom
2080 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jan 2003 : 01:38:53
|
Ok, I know that Candlekeep ran a poll on this some time ago when the logo first changed (http://www.candlekeep.com/voting/results_logo.htm) but as time has passed and some people who at first snub change (human nature I suppose ), may have warmed to the 3rd edition logo....... Now, which logo do you prefer, the 2nd edition logo or the 3rd edition logo? If you dont know what im talking about, see the above link
|
Lord Rad
"What? No, I wasn't reading your module. I was just looking at the pictures"
|
|
Lord Rad
Great Reader
United Kingdom
2080 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jan 2003 : 01:40:33
|
I personally was one of those who didnt like the change, I originally chose the 2nd ed. logo to be the best, but now I LOVE the 3rd ed. logo
I think the style is quite classy and the font is really unique and mysterious. The whole style of 3rd edition FR products is the best yet. The parchment effects and chapter headers are just perfect!
So......... I vote 3rd edition logo!! |
Lord Rad
"What? No, I wasn't reading your module. I was just looking at the pictures"
|
|
|
kahonen
Senior Scribe
United Kingdom
358 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jan 2003 : 02:21:01
|
quote: Originally posted by Rad
Ok, I know that Candlekeep ran a poll on this some time ago when the logo first changed (http://www.candlekeep.com/voting/results_logo.htm) but as time has passed and some people who at first snub change (human nature I suppose ), may have warmed to the 3rd edition logo....... Now, which logo do you prefer, the 2nd edition logo or the 3rd edition logo? If you dont know what im talking about, see the above link
I still prefer the old one. But I still prefer the old D&D logo - the one with the & in the shape of a Dragon. |
|
|
Mumadar Ibn Huzal
Master of Realmslore
1338 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jan 2003 : 09:28:27
|
I don't really have a preference for the logo... as long as they keep a consistent format for the products. Currently all the new FR products have the smae look and feel (exception Monsters of Faerun), besides looking nice on a bookshelf, it helps provide a little of that special realms-feel.
Ok if I have to vote... the new logo... just because it's fresh and reinvigorated. |
|
|
Lord Rad
Great Reader
United Kingdom
2080 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jan 2003 : 09:58:36
|
quote: Originally posted by Mumadar Ibn Huzal I don't really have a preference for the logo... as long as they keep a consistent format for the products. Currently all the new FR products have the smae look and feel (exception Monsters of Faerun), besides looking nice on a bookshelf, it helps provide a little of that special realms-feel.
Just a quick response to that about Monsters of Faerun (I dont want to start on about this incase this thread gets off topic) but I wish, I wish, I wish that WotC would rerelease Monsters of Faerun in the FR product style, it would fit so much better with the rest |
Lord Rad
"What? No, I wasn't reading your module. I was just looking at the pictures"
|
|
|
Echon
Senior Scribe
Denmark
422 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jan 2003 : 12:45:46
|
I believe I have yet to see the new 3rd Ed logo. The link contained only the old one.
-Echon |
"If others had not been foolish, we should be so."
-William Blake |
Edited by - Echon on 25 Jan 2003 12:46:36 |
|
|
zemd
Master of Realmslore
France
1103 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jan 2003 : 12:51:22
|
I vote for the new one. |
|
|
Mumadar Ibn Huzal
Master of Realmslore
1338 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jan 2003 : 13:04:44
|
quote: Originally posted by Echon
I believe I have yet to see the new 3rd Ed logo. The link contained only the old one.
-Echon
If you go here, you'll find the new logo (as well as on all but one of the 3rd ed. Realms products) |
|
|
Echon
Senior Scribe
Denmark
422 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jan 2003 : 13:07:28
|
Thanks.
I prefer the old one although the new logo is quite good as well.
-Echon |
"If others had not been foolish, we should be so."
-William Blake |
|
|
Bookwyrm
Great Reader
USA
4740 Posts |
Posted - 26 Jan 2003 : 05:01:41
|
I really do prefer the old one, actually. It's more "realmsy" to me. When I looked at the new one, my first impression was of a kind of dessert feel. Even though I've gotten used to it now, I still feel like it's not equal to all of the Realms. Like it doesn't "fit" someplace like Myth Drannor, or Icewind Dale. All a matter of aesthetics, really.
Still, as my signature suggests, I try to be open-minded. Now if only I could keep my brain from falling out . . . . |
Hell hath no fury like all of Candlekeep rising in defense of one of its own.
Download the brickfilm masterpiece by Leftfield Studios! See this page for more. |
|
|
Lost Elph
Seeker
USA
61 Posts |
Posted - 26 Jan 2003 : 05:18:07
|
Well I like them both. But I like the 2nd one a little better, but I guess its because I haven`t gotten use to the 3rd yet. But as time passes I`m likeing it better and better. |
I`m not lost, my dreams are.
I am one of those people who go through life unseen, but I don`t think of it as a bad thing, no I think of it as an opportunity |
|
|
Sadonayerah Odrydin
Learned Scribe
USA
210 Posts |
Posted - 26 Jan 2003 : 05:44:05
|
I prefer the older one better. The newer one in my opinion is too new. It stands out way too much. But of course, that's just me. I'll probably get used to it after a while though. |
"What's that," asked Mogget. "Sardines," said Sam. "I knew they were standard rations, so I got a few tins for you." "What are sardines?" Moggest asked suspiciously. "And why is there a key? Is this some sort of Abhorsen joke?" Abhorsen by Garth Nix
"What you made a vampire...Pomeranian?!" --Hannibal King from Blade Trinity
~Sadie |
|
|
Drummer Boy
Senior Scribe
USA
395 Posts |
Posted - 26 Jan 2003 : 18:56:47
|
I think I prefer the logo that won the poll (I think its the new one but I'm not sure). It just looks more appealing to the eye (well, my eye anyway!) |
|
|
jason12345
Acolyte
Afghanistan
19 Posts |
Posted - 26 Jan 2003 : 20:58:06
|
I think the first one is the best. I always like the original, from the original Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (now its Ninja Force or something stupid) to the old Denver Bronco uniforms (the orange ones with less blue) P.S. I hope the Raiders lose the SuperBowl today! |
"Beans are neither fruit nor musical"
-Bart Simpson |
|
|
Feanor_Karnil
Learned Scribe
USA
132 Posts |
Posted - 26 Jan 2003 : 21:02:13
|
The original logo is decent but they improved greatly on the 3E logo, it looks much better. |
We live in a bleak world my friend, where heroes are few and shadows stalk us around every corner. -Mikai Daerni |
|
|
Trafaldi
Learned Scribe
264 Posts |
Posted - 29 Jan 2003 : 15:23:37
|
3rd edition is the better looking logo. |
Some believe there is something more after death, if you really want to find out... go kill yourself and stop pestering me. |
|
|
Aust Grimshadow
Acolyte
USA
45 Posts |
Posted - 17 Feb 2003 : 21:29:50
|
I vote the 3e logo. More intricate design and it just looks more professional. The old one just looks so outdated and 80's-ish. |
"Lies engulf the drow in fear and mistrust, refute friendship at the tip of a Lolth blessed sword. The hatred and ambition fostered by these amoral tenets are the doom of my people, a weakness they perceive as strength. The result is a paralyzing existence that the drow call the edge of readiness." -Drizzt Do'Urden |
|
|
Elrond Half Elven
Learned Scribe
United Kingdom
322 Posts |
Posted - 18 Feb 2003 : 14:50:29
|
Despite being a 2nd edition player I think I prefer the look of the 3rd Edition logo. HOWEVER! The 2nd Edition one is much more noticeable, many the time have I been looking through my local AD&D store and seen a book with it on the front cover and instantly thought... Forgotten Realms. However when I look through a bundle of 3E stuff I need to look twice to notice the campaign setting. |
Once upon a midnight dreary, while i pondered, weak and weary, Over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore- While i nodded, nearly napping, suddenly there came a tapping, As of some one gently rapping, rapping at my chamber door. -The Raven by Edgar Allan Poe |
|
|
Mumadar Ibn Huzal
Master of Realmslore
1338 Posts |
Posted - 18 Feb 2003 : 15:09:44
|
I could imagine that for the novels... but for the game accessories that seems a bit odd. They have a very distinct layout and cover background, something that really stands out among the other D&D products IMO. A situation similar to the last series of FR accessories for 2nd edition... |
|
|
Ranaghar Tsaran
Learned Scribe
Poland
133 Posts |
Posted - 18 Feb 2003 : 19:17:03
|
3rd edition logo is better, I think... |
"Do not be afraid of greatness. Some achieve greatness, some are born great, and some have greatness thrust upon them..." |
|
|
KlarthAilerion
Acolyte
49 Posts |
Posted - 18 Feb 2003 : 19:58:51
|
While I like both, I prefer the 2nd edition logo. |
|
|
Narv
Acolyte
United Kingdom
10 Posts |
Posted - 22 Feb 2003 : 14:59:16
|
I prefer the 3E version myself. I also love the FRCS book itself, definately the the most pleasing on the eye of all the source books I have. |
|
|
Ditalidas
Learned Scribe
Netherlands
127 Posts |
Posted - 22 Feb 2003 : 15:43:59
|
quote: Originally posted by Narv
I also love the FRCS book itself, definately the the most pleasing on the eye of all the source books I have.
I agree on that one. As for the logo I think I like third better, but I have no problems with the logo of the second edition either. |
'All that is' is also 'All that is not' for the one cannot exist without the other.
Sweet Water and Light Laughter |
|
|
Jalfrez
Acolyte
USA
15 Posts |
Posted - 22 Feb 2003 : 21:52:30
|
The third edition is my favorite. |
Millike for all
|
|
|
|
Topic |
|