Author |
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
sleyvas
Skilled Spell Strategist
![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif)
USA
11798 Posts |
Posted - 23 Dec 2020 : 15:26:23
|
quote: Originally posted by TheIriaeban
They could have had Gargauth be a bigger player or if they really wanted to introduce a new god of indulgence, use Kanchelsis.
The Kanchelsis angle for a "god of indulgence" would make sense. That being said, the portfolio of "indulgence", wasn't necessarily one that Gargauth espoused. Gargauth was more a god of political corruption, betrayal, and "contracts". The closest thing to indulgence was probably Sharess (who also doesn't appear on the list of current deities in the SCAG, but like Velsharoon I wouldn't say she's gone). One thing I've felt for a while is that certain portfolios (despite earlier editions saying differently) can be held by multiple beings at the same time in the same pantheon, but they simply receive worship from different groups. I can see more males and vampires turning to Kanchelsis, whereas I can see more females turning to Sharess. The two cults might actually war with one another to win over worshippers, and given that "officially" Asmodeus holds "the title".... I could actually see several such cults working against Asmodeus' worshippers now (including beings like Gargauth, Bane, and even demon cults working to remove his worshippers). I don't see Asmodeus having a lot of allies within the pantheon who might send their worshippers to help his. To a degree, with the second sundering returning deities, it might be open hunting on Asmodeus' worshippers by several power groups right now, and most of them being evil rather than good. |
Alavairthae, may your skill prevail
Phillip aka Sleyvas |
Edited by - sleyvas on 23 Dec 2020 16:12:25 |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
TheIriaeban
Master of Realmslore
![](images/icon_star_silver.gif) ![](images/icon_star_silver.gif) ![](images/icon_star_silver.gif) ![](images/icon_star_silver.gif)
USA
1289 Posts |
Posted - 23 Dec 2020 : 17:26:32
|
quote: Originally posted by sleyvas
quote: Originally posted by TheIriaeban
They could have had Gargauth be a bigger player or if they really wanted to introduce a new god of indulgence, use Kanchelsis.
The Kanchelsis angle for a "god of indulgence" would make sense. That being said, the portfolio of "indulgence", wasn't necessarily one that Gargauth espoused. Gargauth was more a god of political corruption, betrayal, and "contracts". The closest thing to indulgence was probably Sharess (who also doesn't appear on the list of current deities in the SCAG, but like Velsharoon I wouldn't say she's gone). One thing I've felt for a while is that certain portfolios (despite earlier editions saying differently) can be held by multiple beings at the same time in the same pantheon, but they simply receive worship from different groups. I can see more males and vampires turning to Kanchelsis, whereas I can see more females turning to Sharess. The two cults might actually war with one another to win over worshippers, and given that "officially" Asmodeus holds "the title".... I could actually see several such cults working against Asmodeus' worshippers now (including beings like Gargauth, Bane, and even demon cults working to remove his worshippers). I don't see Asmodeus having a lot of allies within the pantheon who might send their worshippers to help his. To a degree, with the second sundering returning deities, it might be open hunting on Asmodeus' worshippers by several power groups right now, and most of them being evil rather than good.
The SCA says that Asmo is the god of indulgence. However, after reading through his entry in there, I believe that the author/designer brought in, either consciously or subconsciously, their Judeo/Christian beliefs and history.
For one thing, the word "sin" is used at one point instead of transgression. Merriam-Webster has that defined as "an offense against religious or moral law". In a monotheism, you have a single source for those laws. In a polytheism, you have several sources so while the action may be a transgression against one god, another one may encourage it. Given that everyone is aware of that fact, why would a "sinner" reach out to anyone other than their patron god? In that kind of system, where gods actively interact with their followers, it is a transactional system and not one of blind faith.
Secondly, god of indulgence? That smacks just too much for me of Christian history. The Catholic Church back in the Middle Ages would sell "indulgences" that allowed the purchaser to sin and not get a bad mark on their soul's record for it. So, suddenly, in a pantheon of gods, you have a "devil making deals" saying if you "sin against your god", it will be ok? That just doesn't pass the smell test. If that is typical to the 5e Realms, no thanks, I'll pass. Just like the Spellplague turned me off to 4e.
|
"Iriaebor is a fine city. So what if you can have violence between merchant groups break out at any moment. Not every city can offer dinner AND a show."
My FR writeups - http://www.mediafire.com/folder/um3liz6tqsf5n/Documents
|
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
![Moderator](icon_moderator.gif)
![](images/icon_star_cyan.gif) ![](images/icon_star_cyan.gif) ![](images/icon_star_cyan.gif) ![](images/icon_star_cyan.gif) ![](images/icon_star_cyan.gif)
USA
36789 Posts |
Posted - 23 Dec 2020 : 18:51:37
|
quote: Originally posted by TheIriaeban
Secondly, god of indulgence? That smacks just too much for me of Christian history. The Catholic Church back in the Middle Ages would sell "indulgences" that allowed the purchaser to sin and not get a bad mark on their soul's record for it. So, suddenly, in a pantheon of gods, you have a "devil making deals" saying if you "sin against your god", it will be ok? That just doesn't pass the smell test. If that is typical to the 5e Realms, no thanks, I'll pass. Just like the Spellplague turned me off to 4e.
First, I agree with you, in large part... Except for the god of indulgence part. I'm familiar with the real-world history of that term, but I don't think that's what's meant in regards to Asmodeus. I think it's the "the practice of allowing enjoyment of whatever is desired" definition of the word -- you do you, and don't worry about if it's moral or not. That seems much more the province of an evil deity.
Not a fan of Asmodeus, and he'll never be a deity in my Realms, but I figured this needed to be said. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen! ![](images/icon_smile_tongue.gif) |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|
|
|