Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Forgotten Realms Products
 D&D Core Products
 DDi: Same old website that will soon cost us $$?
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 5

Rinonalyrna Fathomlin
Great Reader

USA
7106 Posts

Posted - 17 Nov 2008 :  19:04:21  Show Profile  Visit Rinonalyrna Fathomlin's Homepage Send Rinonalyrna Fathomlin a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert


I would, man, but I don't get their forum layout! It's utterly unlike any other one I've seen...



I agree, I find the forum layout to be very confusing.

"Instead of asking why we sleep, it might make sense to ask why we wake. Perchance we live to dream. From that perspective, the sea of troubles we navigate in the workaday world might be the price we pay for admission to another night in the world of dreams."
--Richard Greene (letter to Time)
Go to Top of Page

MerrikCale
Senior Scribe

USA
947 Posts

Posted - 18 Nov 2008 :  04:02:52  Show Profile  Visit MerrikCale's Homepage Send MerrikCale a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I agree. The paizo forums need to be restructured.



When hinges creak in doorless chambers and strange and frightening sounds echo through the halls, whenever candlelights flicker where the air is deathly still, that is the time when ghosts are present, practicing their terror with ghoulish delight.
Go to Top of Page

Purple Dragon Knight
Master of Realmslore

Canada
1796 Posts

Posted - 18 Nov 2008 :  05:20:38  Show Profile Send Purple Dragon Knight a Private Message  Reply with Quote
The trick is to do what you did after you first came here a few times: bookmark their "main" forum page (where they list all the topics/sections)

There are indeed a vast sea of posts over there, so unlike here, you'll have to accept that you can't read them all.

You can follow your favorite threads there by making a post; from there on end, you'll see these threads marked with a black dot, indicating they are one of your contributed threads (so, while CK does not need such a feature due to the smaller thread count, Paizo compensates by giving you a "flagging" tool...)
Go to Top of Page

Na-Gang
Learned Scribe

United Kingdom
348 Posts

Posted - 25 Nov 2008 :  11:16:01  Show Profile  Visit Na-Gang's Homepage Send Na-Gang a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

I'm interested in the Baphomet article currently up on the DDI site, but I'm not paying just for that one article.



I only just saw this. I know I shouldn't comment because I haven't seen this new article (because obviously I don't subscribe) but I don't imagine it will be very different (apart from 4E stats guff) from the last time they published Baphomet's Demonomicon entry in Dragon issue 341.

If D&DI was putting out completely new stuff, instead of repeating articles I might be slightly interested. As it is I'm faintly disgusted that WotC would try and sell this again.
Go to Top of Page

scererar
Master of Realmslore

USA
1618 Posts

Posted - 25 Nov 2008 :  13:13:12  Show Profile Send scererar a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Na-Gang

quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

I'm interested in the Baphomet article currently up on the DDI site, but I'm not paying just for that one article.



I only just saw this. I know I shouldn't comment because I haven't seen this new article (because obviously I don't subscribe) but I don't imagine it will be very different (apart from 4E stats guff) from the last time they published Baphomet's Demonomicon entry in Dragon issue 341.



It is a 13 page article focusing on his plans, allies and enemies. He is supposed to be stated out in the manual of the planes source. I don't have the dragon article from #341 to know if it is regurgitated info, but it is obviously a 4E update/conversion.
Go to Top of Page

Gang Falconhand
Seeker

United Kingdom
85 Posts

Posted - 07 Jan 2009 :  11:32:36  Show Profile  Visit Gang Falconhand's Homepage Send Gang Falconhand a Private Message  Reply with Quote
So has ANYONE here subscribed to DDi?

I must admit that in a moment of weakness I almost just did. Even though we don't play in 4E.

"If you have a quality let it define you."
Go to Top of Page

Zorro
Seeker

Germany
82 Posts

Posted - 07 Jan 2009 :  20:05:26  Show Profile  Visit Zorro's Homepage Send Zorro a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I haven't, and I can say with certainty that I never will.

Zorro

I think that God in creating Man somewhat overestimated his ability. - Oscar Wilde
Go to Top of Page

scererar
Master of Realmslore

USA
1618 Posts

Posted - 08 Jan 2009 :  02:21:29  Show Profile Send scererar a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Gang Falconhand

So has ANYONE here subscribed to DDi?

I must admit that in a moment of weakness I almost just did. Even though we don't play in 4E.



I have for the past couple of months for the Dragon and Dungeon Magazines. Not as much FR stuff as I initially thought, but I truly dig most of the content.

I am not all that interested in the other features available now or in the creation process still. I remain hopeful that as the new edition gets into things more, we will see much more FR content in the magazines.
Go to Top of Page

Gang Falconhand
Seeker

United Kingdom
85 Posts

Posted - 08 Jan 2009 :  09:30:53  Show Profile  Visit Gang Falconhand's Homepage Send Gang Falconhand a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by scererar
I have for the past couple of months for the Dragon and Dungeon Magazines. Not as much FR stuff as I initially thought, but I truly dig most of the content.

I am not all that interested in the other features available now or in the creation process still. I remain hopeful that as the new edition gets into things more, we will see much more FR content in the magazines.



Do you now, or do you intend in the foreseeable future, to play in 4E?

"If you have a quality let it define you."
Go to Top of Page

scererar
Master of Realmslore

USA
1618 Posts

Posted - 08 Jan 2009 :  14:39:44  Show Profile Send scererar a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Gang Falconhand

quote:
Originally posted by scererar
I have for the past couple of months for the Dragon and Dungeon Magazines. Not as much FR stuff as I initially thought, but I truly dig most of the content.

I am not all that interested in the other features available now or in the creation process still. I remain hopeful that as the new edition gets into things more, we will see much more FR content in the magazines.



Do you now, or do you intend in the foreseeable future, to play in 4E?



yes. I have switched to the 4E rule set and 4E realms. I still have and will utilize FR lore from all editions and will set campaigns both before and after the Spellplague.
Go to Top of Page

Rinonalyrna Fathomlin
Great Reader

USA
7106 Posts

Posted - 08 Jan 2009 :  23:13:04  Show Profile  Visit Rinonalyrna Fathomlin's Homepage Send Rinonalyrna Fathomlin a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Gang Falconhand

So has ANYONE here subscribed to DDi?




I've wavered back and forth on whether or not to subscribe, but after reading some feedback about it (such as on this very website), I've decided not to, at least not at this time.

"Instead of asking why we sleep, it might make sense to ask why we wake. Perchance we live to dream. From that perspective, the sea of troubles we navigate in the workaday world might be the price we pay for admission to another night in the world of dreams."
--Richard Greene (letter to Time)
Go to Top of Page

The Sage
Procrastinator Most High

Australia
31799 Posts

Posted - 08 Jan 2009 :  23:34:12  Show Profile Send The Sage a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Rinonalyrna Fathomlin

quote:
Originally posted by Gang Falconhand

So has ANYONE here subscribed to DDi?




I've wavered back and forth on whether or not to subscribe, but after reading some feedback about it (such as on this very website), I've decided not to, at least not at this time.

I'm the same. And the recent comments several scribes here at Candlekeep have made about the difficulties some members have encountered when trying to cancel their subscription has put me further off the idea of signing-up for DDi.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)

"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood

Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage
Go to Top of Page

Christopher_Rowe
Forgotten Realms Author

USA
879 Posts

Posted - 08 Jan 2009 :  23:46:35  Show Profile  Visit Christopher_Rowe's Homepage Send Christopher_Rowe a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I'm subscribed, and alas, can't offer any insight with log-in difficulties as I haven't experienced any. I signed up purely for the magazines (I use Ema's for my character sheets and am Mac based anyway) and have found it more than worth it just for those, but have also actually wound up using the Compendium more than I thought I would have.
Go to Top of Page

silverwizard
Seeker

Greece
76 Posts

Posted - 09 Jan 2009 :  00:00:01  Show Profile  Visit silverwizard's Homepage Send silverwizard a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Purple Dragon Knight

I switched my alignment from Lawful Good to Chaotic Good, and lo and behold! I now fully understand their boards!



So how come you're still a Purple Dragon Knight then? I thought they were supposed to be lawful!

On a more serious note, I'd recommend to my fellow scribes to go along with PDK's suggestion. Once you get used to this (admittedly) chaotic board structure, you'll find that the Paizo boards are the exact opposite of the WotC boards (and that can only be a good thing).
Go to Top of Page

scererar
Master of Realmslore

USA
1618 Posts

Posted - 09 Jan 2009 :  03:39:19  Show Profile Send scererar a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Christopher_Rowe

I'm subscribed, and alas, can't offer any insight with log-in difficulties as I haven't experienced any. I signed up purely for the magazines (I use Ema's for my character sheets and am Mac based anyway) and have found it more than worth it just for those, but have also actually wound up using the Compendium more than I thought I would have.



I have not had any problems either, other than than the occasional not being able to log onto the website period, which all sites encounter from time to time to get kinks worked out. I have also gone through the motions to try and end the auto renew to see if I could and did not appear to have any troubles to do so, but I did not try to do it 100%. As with all things, it takes time. I truly am enjoying the 2 magazines. I can see though, that if a person is not into 4E, these would not be useful.

Edited by - scererar on 09 Jan 2009 03:41:34
Go to Top of Page

Christopher_Rowe
Forgotten Realms Author

USA
879 Posts

Posted - 09 Jan 2009 :  13:47:47  Show Profile  Visit Christopher_Rowe's Homepage Send Christopher_Rowe a Private Message  Reply with Quote
One of the blogs I read--and I'm sorry, but I've got too many on my RSS reader and don't know which off the top of my head--does this "Behind the Wall" feature that consists of capsule descriptions and reviews of the pay content, concluding with a guess at how "worth it" folks might find each piece. Next time one pops up I'll try to remember to link it in here. It's Dragon Avenue or Gnome Stew, one of those or their allies.

My Realms novel, Sandstorm, is now available for ordering.
Go to Top of Page

Brimstone
Great Reader

USA
3290 Posts

Posted - 19 Feb 2009 :  02:26:34  Show Profile Send Brimstone a Private Message  Reply with Quote
-Well I broke down and subscribed for the next year today. I really like the Rules Compendium.

BRIMSTONE

"These things also I have observed: that knowledge of our world is
to be nurtured like a precious flower, for it is the most precious
thing we have. Wherefore guard the word written and heed
words unwritten and set them down ere they fade . . . Learn
then, well, the arts of reading, writing, and listening true, and they
will lead you to the greatest art of all: understanding."
Alaundo of Candlekeep

Edited by - Brimstone on 19 Feb 2009 02:33:23
Go to Top of Page

scererar
Master of Realmslore

USA
1618 Posts

Posted - 19 Feb 2009 :  03:32:00  Show Profile Send scererar a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Brimstone

-Well I broke down and subscribed for the next year today. I really like the Rules Compendium.

BRIMSTONE



While I do not dig the compendium as much, I truly enjoy the Dragon and Dungeon magazines.
Go to Top of Page

Ashe Ravenheart
Great Reader

USA
3254 Posts

Posted - 20 Oct 2009 :  13:47:59  Show Profile Send Ashe Ravenheart a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Yes, it's a bit of thread necromancy, but I came across this article on a Virtual Tabletop over at Gnome Stew and the only thing I can think of is that WotC/Hasbro is REALLY missing the boat...

I actually DO know everything. I just have a very poor index of my knowledge.

Ashe's Character Sheet

Alphabetized Index of Realms NPCs
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36996 Posts

Posted - 20 Oct 2009 :  15:32:52  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Ashe Ravenheart

Yes, it's a bit of thread necromancy, but I came across this article on a Virtual Tabletop over at Gnome Stew and the only thing I can think of is that WotC/Hasbro is REALLY missing the boat...



I've maintained for a while that a good, reasonably-priced virtual tabletop would have done far more to revitalize D&D than a new ruleset would (and that's ignoring the issues this particular new ruleset caused). It doesn't even have to have snazzy graphics -- I think a simple interactive whiteboard, with squares or hexes, would do it, so long as it included a good voicechat system, a system for passing notes, and a dice roller. Actually, I think that a lack of integral graphics would be better -- that way, you'd not need a good video card to get the most enjoyment out of it.

Anything else -- including rulesets, tiles, dungeon dressing, mobs -- could be add-on packs for a small charge. Doing it that way allows people to play whatever version of whatever game they want. And it accomplishes the main objective -- it gets people together to play. Sure, it's virtual, but if the choices are virtual or not playing at all, I think most people would go for virtual.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!
Go to Top of Page

Kiaransalyn
Senior Scribe

United Kingdom
762 Posts

Posted - 20 Oct 2009 :  16:13:41  Show Profile Send Kiaransalyn a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

I've maintained for a while that a good, reasonably-priced virtual tabletop would have done far more to revitalize D&D than a new ruleset would (and that's ignoring the issues this particular new ruleset caused). It doesn't even have to have snazzy graphics -- I think a simple interactive whiteboard, with squares or hexes, would do it, so long as it included a good voicechat system, a system for passing notes, and a dice roller. Actually, I think that a lack of integral graphics would be better -- that way, you'd not need a good video card to get the most enjoyment out of it.

Anything else -- including rulesets, tiles, dungeon dressing, mobs -- could be add-on packs for a small charge. Doing it that way allows people to play whatever version of whatever game they want. And it accomplishes the main objective -- it gets people together to play. Sure, it's virtual, but if the choices are virtual or not playing at all, I think most people would go for virtual.


That tallies with my own thoughts too.

When I was heavily involved in a Neverwinter Nights Persistent World, we had lots of players wanting lots of games. We had players from all over the globe, some setting alarm clocks so they could be on-line as players from other sides of the world.

And mostly they wanted to role-play. Killing goblins, etc was not what kept them gripped. So I wonder, just like you, why WotC didn't take that option.

Death is Life
Love is Hate
Revenge is Forgiveness


Ken: You from the States?
Jimmy: Yeah. But don't hold it against me.
Ken: I'll try not to... Just try not to say anything too loud or crass.
Go to Top of Page

Wooly Rupert
Master of Mischief
Moderator

USA
36996 Posts

Posted - 20 Oct 2009 :  17:22:27  Show Profile Send Wooly Rupert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Kiaransalyn

quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

I've maintained for a while that a good, reasonably-priced virtual tabletop would have done far more to revitalize D&D than a new ruleset would (and that's ignoring the issues this particular new ruleset caused). It doesn't even have to have snazzy graphics -- I think a simple interactive whiteboard, with squares or hexes, would do it, so long as it included a good voicechat system, a system for passing notes, and a dice roller. Actually, I think that a lack of integral graphics would be better -- that way, you'd not need a good video card to get the most enjoyment out of it.

Anything else -- including rulesets, tiles, dungeon dressing, mobs -- could be add-on packs for a small charge. Doing it that way allows people to play whatever version of whatever game they want. And it accomplishes the main objective -- it gets people together to play. Sure, it's virtual, but if the choices are virtual or not playing at all, I think most people would go for virtual.


That tallies with my own thoughts too.

When I was heavily involved in a Neverwinter Nights Persistent World, we had lots of players wanting lots of games. We had players from all over the globe, some setting alarm clocks so they could be on-line as players from other sides of the world.

And mostly they wanted to role-play. Killing goblins, etc was not what kept them gripped. So I wonder, just like you, why WotC didn't take that option.



It is my opinion that someone decided MMOs were dominating because of the game play (and not because of convenience), so they tried to emulate that.

Candlekeep Forums Moderator

Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore
http://www.candlekeep.com
-- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct

I am the Giant Space Hamster of Ill Omen!

Edited by - Wooly Rupert on 20 Oct 2009 17:23:00
Go to Top of Page

Kiaransalyn
Senior Scribe

United Kingdom
762 Posts

Posted - 20 Oct 2009 :  19:53:25  Show Profile Send Kiaransalyn a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wooly Rupert

It is my opinion that someone decided MMOs were dominating because of the game play (and not because of convenience), so they tried to emulate that.


Agreed. For me, the appeal of a game engine/computer game/MMORPG is that the mechanics are handled for you. To use the horrible terminology, the crunch is done for you. What keeps players hooked is the story-line, after a while levelling up becomes boring.

For my players in Menzoberranzan, what gripped them was the various situations where their PC's had to talk their way out of situations or in to them. One of the more popular areas of the PW was the main tavern/drinking pits. Players would just hang out there, chatting in-character - a lovely sign that the setting worked for them.

I often wonder what could have happened had WotC taken an online setting, such as we had, and got better servers, a few paid DM's and asked people to pay a small monthly subscription (say $5). I think it could have taken off.

As you can probably tell, I miss that time.

Death is Life
Love is Hate
Revenge is Forgiveness


Ken: You from the States?
Jimmy: Yeah. But don't hold it against me.
Ken: I'll try not to... Just try not to say anything too loud or crass.
Go to Top of Page

Kiaransalyn
Senior Scribe

United Kingdom
762 Posts

Posted - 20 Oct 2009 :  19:57:33  Show Profile Send Kiaransalyn a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by The Sage

Having said that, I will note that the published format of Baur's KOBOLD QUARTERLY, has helped eased some of the pain I feel over the absence of a quality magazine dealing with one of my favorite activities. He should be commended for his efforts to maintain a tradition that I've loved for so long.


Thanks Sage,
I was going to ask about Kobold Quarterly. But you've answered my question.

Death is Life
Love is Hate
Revenge is Forgiveness


Ken: You from the States?
Jimmy: Yeah. But don't hold it against me.
Ken: I'll try not to... Just try not to say anything too loud or crass.
Go to Top of Page

Kiaransalyn
Senior Scribe

United Kingdom
762 Posts

Posted - 20 Oct 2009 :  20:46:12  Show Profile Send Kiaransalyn a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Ashe Ravenheart

What the ... ?


Thanks for that link Ashe, I missed that last November when you posted it. I'm reminded of Winston Smith and the chocolate ration for some reason.

Death is Life
Love is Hate
Revenge is Forgiveness


Ken: You from the States?
Jimmy: Yeah. But don't hold it against me.
Ken: I'll try not to... Just try not to say anything too loud or crass.
Go to Top of Page

Diffan
Great Reader

USA
4495 Posts

Posted - 23 Oct 2009 :  19:12:18  Show Profile Send Diffan a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I too have wavered between getting it and not. At first I felt it wasn't needed and useless and just another way for WotC to get my money. But as I read about articles that come out of DDi, the benefits of their download-able programs, and the fact that I just got a laptop (i know, welcome to 2009!) have increased my interest of DDi. So it's going on the x-mas list I give to my wife (she's so understanding, lol).
Go to Top of Page

skychrome
Senior Scribe

713 Posts

Posted - 23 Oct 2009 :  20:35:43  Show Profile  Visit skychrome's Homepage Send skychrome a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Kiaransalyn
I often wonder what could have happened had WotC taken an online setting, such as we had, and got better servers, a few paid DM's and asked people to pay a small monthly subscription (say $5). I think it could have taken off.

As you can probably tell, I miss that time.



Kiaransalyn, as you use the past tense, what happened with your Persistent World?

"You make an intriguing offer, one that is very tempting. It would seem that I have little alternative than to answer thusly: DISINTEGRATE!" Vaarsuvius, Order of the Stick 625
Go to Top of Page

Kiaransalyn
Senior Scribe

United Kingdom
762 Posts

Posted - 27 Oct 2009 :  14:28:37  Show Profile Send Kiaransalyn a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by skychrome

Kiaransalyn, as you use the past tense, what happened with your Persistent World?


It fell apart, is the best way of answering that question.

First the forums got hacked and the chief administrator took ages setting up a new forum. Having the server host go silent for weeks and months at a time didn't help either.

From my own point of view, when I was involved I had a lot of free time on my hands. But then I moved to a new job in The Netherlands, which required a lot more of my time and effort, so I had to scale back my duties as Head DM, forum admin', builder, NPC Team leader and writer of the Players Guide.

We move on, I guess.

Death is Life
Love is Hate
Revenge is Forgiveness


Ken: You from the States?
Jimmy: Yeah. But don't hold it against me.
Ken: I'll try not to... Just try not to say anything too loud or crass.
Go to Top of Page

skychrome
Senior Scribe

713 Posts

Posted - 27 Oct 2009 :  15:42:32  Show Profile  Visit skychrome's Homepage Send skychrome a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Right. Well, what a shame, the PW sounds really interesting to me. Would have loved to play on that server!

"You make an intriguing offer, one that is very tempting. It would seem that I have little alternative than to answer thusly: DISINTEGRATE!" Vaarsuvius, Order of the Stick 625
Go to Top of Page

Kiaransalyn
Senior Scribe

United Kingdom
762 Posts

Posted - 27 Oct 2009 :  19:14:08  Show Profile Send Kiaransalyn a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by skychrome

Right. Well, what a shame, the PW sounds really interesting to me. Would have loved to play on that server!



It was very good fun. The last time I searched for the old forums they were jam packed for of spam so I didn't linger long enough to see if there was still any life.

Death is Life
Love is Hate
Revenge is Forgiveness


Ken: You from the States?
Jimmy: Yeah. But don't hold it against me.
Ken: I'll try not to... Just try not to say anything too loud or crass.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 5 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2026 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000