Author |
Topic |
Delnyn
Senior Scribe
USA
948 Posts |
Posted - 24 Oct 2024 : 18:49:42
|
Should there necessarily even be a so-called main core setting? I am skeptical. |
|
|
HighOne
Learned Scribe
216 Posts |
Posted - 25 Oct 2024 : 00:59:53
|
quote: Originally posted by The Sage
Heh. I remember the days when EBERRON was intended to take the place of GH and FR as the main core D&D setting.
I kind of thought the Critical Role setting would become default eventually. There was even an official campaign setting book. But I never hear about Critical Role any more, so maybe it's not as popular as it once was. |
|
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
Australia
31771 Posts |
Posted - 25 Oct 2024 : 01:11:55
|
quote: Originally posted by Delnyn
Should there necessarily even be a so-called main core setting? I am skeptical.
I think for some game elements… it’s suggestively necessary. Like outlining deities, planes and cities and races. But then again, so many third-party generic rules-sets and settings establish themselves without a main core world forming the background for it…
I suppose the argument could be made either way. Just depends on the DM and the players themselves. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)
"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood
Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage |
|
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
Australia
31771 Posts |
Posted - 25 Oct 2024 : 01:14:08
|
quote: Originally posted by HighOne
quote: Originally posted by The Sage
Heh. I remember the days when EBERRON was intended to take the place of GH and FR as the main core D&D setting.
I kind of thought the Critical Role setting would become default eventually. There was even an official campaign setting book. But I never hear about Critical Role any more, so maybe it's not as popular as it once was.
Interestingly enough, I just picked up that book the other day because it has some fascinating tidbits I’d learned about elsewhere… that I’d like to drop into my current Realms campaign.
It’s a shame this book hasn’t been expanded upon. It has the groundwork for some truly thrilling campaigns and lore-development. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)
"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood
Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage |
|
|
Werthead
Learned Scribe
United Kingdom
191 Posts |
Posted - 25 Oct 2024 : 20:49:55
|
The core setting for 5.5E (and, unofficially, the last few years of 5E) is "the entire D&D multiverse." Forgotten Realms will likely remain the "base D&D" setting simply because of cross-marketing synergy (urgh) because when they say "Baldur's Gate," "Waterdeep" or "Neverwinter" people's ears prick up and they immediately rush to buy it. But it also sounds like they're happy to tap Planescape, Spelljammer, Eberron, Greyhawk and Dragonlance stuff going forwards, maybe Ravenloft a bit (but probably never Dark Sun, and by this point I assume they've forgotten Gothic Earth, Birthright and Mystara even exist).
I'll be honest and say that between the quality of the recent material and also being older and having much less free time to sit down and absorb new FR material (which I was able to in droves in the 1990s and 2000s), a relatively restrained release schedule is no bad thing. Complete newcomers learning the ropes on FR right now probably spend 90% of their learning curve catching up on 1-3E material and maybe 10% on 4E-5E material combined. |
|
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
Australia
31771 Posts |
|
Werthead
Learned Scribe
United Kingdom
191 Posts |
Posted - 31 Oct 2024 : 23:25:20
|
quote: Originally posted by The Sage
Heck. I’d love to see some new DARK SUN material.
I would like to see it done well, but after Spelljammer (terrible) and Planescape (mediocre), and with WotC's refusal to depict slavery at all (even as a obviously bad and evil thing), I don't see modern WotC being able to do it.
Maybe they could licence it to someone to run as a third-party setting, like they did for 3E with Dragonlance and Ravenloft, that could work. I could see someone like Free League doing something very interesting with it. |
|
|
The Sage
Procrastinator Most High
Australia
31771 Posts |
Posted - 31 Oct 2024 : 23:45:36
|
The 3e RAVENLOFT material was done superbly well. It still had such subtle ties to the old lore and felt like it was an extension of “The Domains of Dread” rather than feeling like a soft reboot. |
Candlekeep Forums Moderator
Candlekeep - The Library of Forgotten Realms Lore http://www.candlekeep.com -- Candlekeep Forum Code of Conduct
Scribe for the Candlekeep Compendium -- Volume IX now available (Oct 2007)
"So Saith Ed" -- the collected Candlekeep replies of Ed Greenwood
Zhoth'ilam Folio -- The Electronic Misadventures of a Rambling Sage |
|
|
DoveArrow
Learned Scribe
103 Posts |
Posted - 11 Nov 2024 : 19:43:37
|
quote: Originally posted by Irennan
Is there an audience for this?
Yes there is interest and I'll tell you why. We dont' know what happened to the lands of Calimshan after the Second Sundering. While there's plenty of information about what happened to the lands up to 1479 DR, there's absolutely no information on what happened after. Did the Forest of Mir return? What about the Spider Swamp? Did Sudolphor recover? There's simply no information on these topics.
My one concern, and it's a completely selfish one, is that I wrote a five part adventure series set in the region for the DMs' Guild. If they come out with this new supplement, it will likely conflict with material I wrote for my adventure series. For example, I liked the idea of the Spires of Mir so I wrote in my adventure series that the lands of Calimshan did not change back after the Second Sundering like the northern regions did. Will WotC contradict that? I did send a copy of my adventure series to Ed Greenwood as a thank you and I know he read them. However, I don't know if anyone else at WotC has read them or even if they would care about what I wrote if they did.
Regardless, I love this region of the Realms and have ideas brimming for what to do with it. If they actually support the region, it's possible we might get additional, official adventures set in the lands of Calimshan. To me, that would be so worth it. |
Edited by - DoveArrow on 11 Nov 2024 19:52:54 |
|
|
Topic |
|