Candlekeep Forum
Candlekeep Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Realmslore
 Sages of Realmslore
 Alignment question

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]
Rolling Eyes [8|] Confused [?!:] Help [?:] King [3|:]
Laughing [:OD] What [W] Oooohh [:H] Down [:E]

  Check here to include your profile signature.
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Silverstar1610 Posted - 20 Jun 2006 : 16:15:53
If a good character does something which might be construed as evil, due to a mistaken belief that it is actually a good act, would this sway them towards evil?

The particular scenario I'm thinking about is this. A good character who agrees to do a favour for an evil character, in the mistaken belief that said evil character is trying to redeem themselves. The act itself is not evil, but they later discover that the evil character was continuing to commit evil acts unbeknownst to the good character. Would working with this evil character make it an evil act regardless of the fact that they believed what they were doing to be a good thing?
4   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Silverstar1610 Posted - 20 Jun 2006 : 19:21:38
Cool. That was pretty much my thought, but it's always useful to get a second (third, fourth) opinion.

Thanks guys.
Wooly Rupert Posted - 20 Jun 2006 : 17:49:07
I'd say that intent is a major factor. If a character intends to do the right thing, and actually does a good deed, then they haven't done evil. The evil was done by the guy who was taking advantage of those good actions, and twisting them to his own benefit.
Kentinal Posted - 20 Jun 2006 : 16:56:38
Alignment is a little more involved then knowing an act is evil. Many Lawful societies have slaves, which is generally considered an Evil act. A slave owner does not consider him/herself an Evil person for buying a slave.

Sometimes the situation needs to be considered.

If an action acidentally aids an Evil goal, the act itself is not Evil in most cases Knowing more about the action can result in iinions being offered as to if the action itself reflects an Evil act.
KnightErrantJR Posted - 20 Jun 2006 : 16:19:31
In general, alignment is how the person views their own actions. Not knowing that an action is aiding evil is not in and of itself evil. Now, if you are talking about a paladin, their code is a little harsher, and they may have to attone if their actions aided the forces of evil in the long run, but for the general, run of the mill good aligned character, being tricked into an act or not knowing the full ramifications of an act shouldn't make the act evil in and of itself.

Just my thoughts though.

Candlekeep Forum © 1999-2024 Candlekeep.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000