All Forums  Realmslore  Sages of Realmslore  Rimlost (*4e Alert*)

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize: 640 x 480 800 x 600 1024 x 768 1280 x 1024 UserName: Password: Format Mode: Basic  Help  Prompt  Format: Font Andale Mono Arial Arial Black Book Antiqua Century Gothic Comic Sans MS Courier New Georgia Impact Lucida Console Script MT Bold Stencil Tahoma Times New Roman Trebuchet MS Verdana   Size 1 2 3 4 5 6   Color Black Red Yellow Pink Green Orange Purple Blue Beige Brown Teal Navy Maroon LimeGreen Message: * HTML is OFF * Forum Code is ON Smilies [quote][i]Originally posted by Markustay[/i] [br]I'm having a bit of a problem while working on returned Abeir. Rimlost appears in the Gontal artical as a fortress on the 'rim' of a water-filled crater on the edge of the 'lost lands' that belonged to a primordial. Seems reasonable enough, but the RA map shows it in the far north on the cost. [?!:] Always deferring to text, I placed in on the crater lake as its supposed to be, and all was right in the world (you can view that [url="http://markustay.deviantart.com/art/Gontal-102698192"]HERE.[/url]) Just one problem... now that I'm doing the North and reading the entry for [i]Fimbrul[/i], Rimlost is also listed for that locale! Without going into a negative tirade here, I decided that the Gontal one was correct. There is bit of a problem with the usual rules for such things - normally newer lore trumps older lore, and that Gontal artical was released first, meaning the FRCG should take precendence over it, buuuuut... that artical was really a Web-Enhancement that was only presented as a preview (since they couldn't fit it into the FRCG). Now, WE's usually are released [i]after[/i], and since that was written [i]after[/i] the FRCG had already been finalized and gone off to the printer, the artical [i]should[/i] be considered the correct version. Only the FRCG [i]did[/i] indeed come out after. [xx(] So now I'm falling back on common sense - the name itself sounds far more like the location in the Gonatal artical then it does in the Fimbrul entry (which has nothing to do with any sort of 'rim'). I have placed a secondary locale on the map in Rimlost's original position, since there is lore about the place (a cult to the Primordials). I have even written a little something about the new name to make it all fit together (I call it Grimroost, to keep it very similar and hence the confusion), and will release that along side the Returned Abeir Map once it is complete. Now that my long-winded explanation is done, here is my question (finally) - [b]Is there an update to either of these locales that anyone knows of?[/b] I would ask over at WotC, but I got banned the last time I used the word 'Errata'. However, the conversation that lead to that banning was about that they had revised some stuff between the FRCG and the FRPG, updating some of the innacurate information. I do not own the second book (not needing any 4e mechanics), so I don't know if there is official lore that supercedes mine. Does anyone have that tome, or can tell me if they know of any official erratta for the two locales? [/quote]   Check here to include your profile signature. Check here to subscribe to this topic.