| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| SirUrza |
Posted - 08 Sep 2007 : 20:44:03
So I have to ask, what's everyone think about it? I've had my copy of #1 for a couple days and have gone through it rather thoroughly, I like it, but it looks like it's more of a Paizo replacement for Dungeon, not Dragon. |
| 3 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| SirUrza |
Posted - 09 Sep 2007 : 03:00:48
True Halidan, but they're also creating their own campaign setting while providing minimal to no player support material. Oh a whole I like the first adventure, I don't mind the comedy goblins, it's awesome. There's crazy evil little critters.
THO, Thanks for the recommendation, I'll check it out. |
| The Hooded One |
Posted - 09 Sep 2007 : 02:46:45
If you're looking for an alternative to DRAGON, why not take a peek at Kobold Quarterly, Wolfgang Baur's new magazine? Ed has an article in issue 2, which should be out soon-ish. PDF online or print copy . . . Easily found on the Net, right now.
love to all,
THO |
| Halidan |
Posted - 09 Sep 2007 : 01:44:45
I've been enjoying the adventure for the most part. I don't care for the GW-style comedy goblins they're using for this first adventure, but that's easily changed. The rest is very good material, and easily trasfered to other campaign settings - including the Realms.
Paizo made it clear early on in it's postings on it's own boards that Pathfinder would be an adventure-only publication - much closer to Dungeon than Dragon. They want to stick with what they do best - which is longer adventure plotlines. They don't want to do a general FRP magazine. |
|
|
