| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Kentinal |
Posted - 09 Oct 2010 : 03:06:04
In some ways I have wrote about this in the bast.
As moderators and others might note that I have posted to the "Ask Ed" in complaint about topic drift.
Far for me to set policy, I however offer the idea that extreme topic drift be deleted at once (including my last post to that scroll). I further request that the scroll be ended every 6 months as opposed to the year as is current policy.
I do recognize under the current coding deletion of a post advances page count as to number of posts and appears not to subtract any posts deleted. I also know that a half failed post attempt does count as a post. The "Ask Ed" clearly shows the most often occurrence, however other scrolls do require a reset. I request that either base code be fixed (yes add to the to do list) or at least a policy be established to at least once a month. |
| 1 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| The Sage |
Posted - 09 Oct 2010 : 03:41:48
quote:
Originally posted by Kentinal
In some ways I have wrote about this in the bast.
As moderators and others might note that I have posted to the "Ask Ed" in complaint about topic drift.
Aye. As I just said in Ed's scroll, I've been kind of lousy with that lately. I'll try to keep up.
quote:
Far for me to set policy, I however offer the idea that extreme topic drift be deleted at once (including my last post to that scroll). I further request that the scroll be ended every 6 months as opposed to the year as is current policy.
It's an interesting idea, and I might consider it for next year's "Questions for Ed Greenwood" scroll. In fact, given the extensive nature of the scroll, I might even be inclined to offer quarterly sessions. Hmmm.
quote:
The "Ask Ed" clearly shows the most often occurrence, however other scrolls do require a reset.
I'll be getting on that shortly.
quote:
I request that either base code be fixed (yes add to the to do list) or at least a policy be established to at least once a month.
At this point, considering that things regarding the update for the site are now moving along, it'd likely be a pointless endeavour to fix the base code. We'll simply want to start utilising the new coding just as soon as we're done.
|
|
|
